All Activity

We understand you are hearing a lot of noise out there, and we wish we could communicate more about it, but this is a legal issue with confidentiality that we will respect. Sorry.

Yes

This can't be that hard to fix. I can't play it like this.

Then can you at least state that ED is holding up their end of the agreement in a timely manner? If an agreement was signed, and allegedly months ago, you would hope both parties would be fulfilling it asap. Just would like to know that ED hasn't been dragging their feet.

How do you miss the significance of a Normal Fighter Variant crashing in England in August of 1944 equipped with Erhohte Notleistung? It literally makes your argument if you know the technical history. How do you miss the significance of that airplane having a Q series engine and the much less common approved but not recommended might not have been used at all GM-1 to your whole argument that Erhohte Notleistung was much more common. It is a fact a EN equipped engine landed in England in 1944. It's a fact that EVERY engine meant for a fighter came from the FACTORY starting in July 1944. That aircraft is literally a Werknummer block from JULY for NORMAL FIGHTER Variant. Erhohte Notleistung was approved approved more than six months earlier. It had been anticipated for a year and half and before that testing for C3 Einspritzung for all altitudes for use in fighters had been successfully tested for operational use. Erhohte Notleistung literally grew out of that whole program when they realized the engine did not require all the extra knock limited performance. You are aware of massive improvements in C3 fuel knock limited protection? The RAE noticed it from just 13 samples puzzling over the improvement in Rich Mixture Performance. They also worried about the hydrogenation process Fisch Trop had developed that literally became by 1944 how 99% of all German Aviation fuel was produced. The RAE noted the fuel samples for C3 going as high as 140(+) Octane in 1941. The United States did their own testing and I am sure you know there are multiple methods of determining Octane levels and they don't correspond to the same values either. The United States Petroleum board was worried that C3 fuel was already 145 Octane in 1942.

It was agreed to by both parties, and as stated, we are hoping it will still be implemented as agreed to.

Can y'all at least comment on if this agreement has been withdrawn? Don't care what's in it. But if you can say it exits you can at least say if it's still active or if it has been withdrawn.

Bought this today and first impressions are good. General handling only so far, over Marianas 2. 50 fps at about 1000' over the jungle. (Mosquito 55 fps). No curves required so far. Cockpit looks great. I'm glad there are British liveries. Looking forward to T & G's. ..

We cannot comment more on anything due to the confidentiality of the agreement. I am sorry that others are trying to skew this, but nothing official beyond what we have said has been released.

It's been long time but IIRC that's incorrect the gateway was around before the ARC-210 was added to the real jet. Even if I'm not remembering correctly I think ED could put their resources to better use than to fix something that isn't that big of a deal like have them model the actual gateway so we can see client F-16s or F/A-18s (and maybe add some missing TAD & HMCS symbology:)).

Today’s newsletter update is truly unbelievable. To say an agreement was reached but hasn’t been implemented, while saying “we can’t say any more”, with the context being that multiple forums say it hasn’t been implemented because ED hasn’t paid, is simply unreal.

HTS is one of the best reasons to Viper. Also, CBU-105's. You can get your Supercarrier fix from the Tomcat. The learning curve for the Tomcat's front seat is pretty mild compared to either the Viper or Hornet. Though AAR in the Turkey is waaaay harder! -Ryan

I'll have a rough ride for sure but it doesn't seem to have changed anything in the flight behavior.

They should just split off the GeForce department, then nVidia can focus on AI as much as they want without negatively affecting gamers. Speaking of a company that forgot where it came from… And AMD isn’t that much better at the moment since they copy nVidia on pretty much everything these days including consumer unfriendly behaviour. I hope that iNTEL gets their cards (and especially drivers!) working properly so we can have a proper 3rd player.

DCS 3.0?? Did I miss some news??

I would imagine the handoff would be a bit difficult considering different bands between AWACS & Host, no? Even if that is inaccurate its likely not reliable if I had to guess.

dcs.log-20250725-161300.zip Update with an immediate action F-14B on CV-59. Crash when wire trap

I also tested this in the P47 and P51 and trim was working for me.

Are we missing the vertical HUD steering cue for JDAMS and -103/105's in PRE mode? Or is it my memory flakey? Thanks! -Ryan

Disappointing. I am glad I didn't get excited and setup my flying rig and take the plunge.

Fuel tanks are surprisingly low-drag compared to other things. -Ryan

Yeah but not if you already paid for it Certainly not forgetting, just waiting

I found this topic because I was using exactly that trick (editing Mods\aircraft\FA-18C\Cockpit1\Scripts\TEWS\device\CMDS_ALE47.lua) to setup the CM the way I liked it, and it doesn't work anymore. As I read that thread it looks that if I load the "DEFAULT" DTC from the MUMI page by boxing the ALE47, I should get what it's in that file? But apparently it doesn't, not on my install at least. Any clue on what to do? Or maybe the new path is aircraft\FA-18C\DTC\ALR67\CMDS_defs.lua ? That file doesn't exist here but maybe I should create it?

Indeed. In the meantime, enjoy them while you can!

Hello, it's the same for me when the planes hook the cable the game crashes. 2.9.18 12722