All Activity

Жуть

Вот точно такая же история и у меня, когда с захватом ракета летит ниже крестика. Буду тренироваться, что ж. )

Not sure at all .

I haven't seen the price tag and assumed $30... which will likely be $15 during sales, true that. Not a big deal. Or maybe even less with WWII pack. The story with the giveway is interesting. Maybe people got shy. Happy flying to you as well.

dcs.log

Yeah compared to the other warbirds this thing doesnt really want to turn at all. Sometimes i get it to spin nicely and do a 180 if i have room to wind up some speed, but room runs out fast on a carrier and wind seems to be affecting it alot. Its pretty useless really. cant really taxi on it. With the other warbids, i can basically do donuts on the spot without tipping over. not so in the carrier. So i retried. If you give it a quick surge in mp and then hit left break and left rudder itll do a nice left turn, but once you try to do the same to position you nose into the wind, you just do a 90 deg turn and the wind is basically pushing you that it slows you down and pushes you to the rim of the deck. I can reall figure this out

I was just building an Iraq mission in Dec 2004. Apparently, daytime temps were typically 30 degrees. In the mission editor, I was limited to 16

Is this delay due to inadequate sound from DMAS?

Here we have the first video by Naval historian, Drachinifel, detailing the reasons behind the British wanting to send a 120 ship fleet to the Pacific theatre of operations and the reasons why the Americans didn't want them to come. But they went anyway and proved themselves worthy, by attacking the Japanese main source of aviation fuel, on their way to their new base in Australia. The British Fleet carrier task force leaves Australia and joins the American fleet attacking Okinawa and its job is to attack airfields on Sakishima which is flying Kamikasi raids against the Americans. ..

Thank you as always Eduardo! [emoji1319] [emoji1303] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk Post your DCS.log. I have a feeling it might conflict with other mods you have. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

That's my general outlook on many modules. Some modules I learn in depth (kind of) and some it's very superficial. The C-130 will be an in-depth module for me. It's right up my alley of what and how I want to fly.

Or a speed devil. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Not just assume, they have confirmed it. And, they kind of said they would do it sometime a year or so ago, just not when. So it was always pretty obvious it was always going to be an ED module. [emoji6] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Fair enough, i don’t think you are wrong, i was more on about learning to program every weapon on the F-16 (for example) or landing an F-18 in proper carrier patterns on top of weapons and navigation, now dont get me wrong, I wouldn’t change it or fly a dumbed down version, I might pick up those jets again if the dynamic campaign works well but I can’t fly often enough to join a server and be proficient so it’s SP only for me.

I don't think he was talking about the invidual assets, but rather change the name of the complete pack, like in the store. [emoji6] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

I just fail to see how a $15 asset pack would split or fragment anything. We all have to pay for our toys. And if "the community" don't want to be split, fragmented, rent asunder, folded, bent, or discombobulated, they'll simply have to cough up the 15 dollar-e-doos like the rest of us. Also, and I'll end it here, I've had this discussion before. The end result was I posted that I had two free WWII assets packs to give away. And another guy had one to offer after my two were taken. Three free WWII asset packs total were offered. The exact amount of people who asked for the free WWII assets packs after a few days was... none at all. That was the cherry on the cake of my views of "the split community". That said, I wish you a good day and happy flying.

Thanks ! I suppose 0.9.6 is the latest release? P.S.: just installed 0.9.6. DCS still CTD unfortunately.

So at last the Super arrived beatifully boxed and packaged Opened carefully examined everything and the DMAS speakers are missing. Notified PIMAX and --- After confirmation with the product line, we expect to reissue the DMAS headset to you at the beginning of October. Hopefully my 2 week Pimax play wont contain any limit of two weeks, as contractually its not fullfilled.

Type 3 in the WS declaration is AA. But in tests it will engage surface targets if it can. Type 6 is naval arty, Type 11 mixed iirc. The issue with this as I have found is that ED schemes are limiting. 5" were used as very poor barrage, 1 in 1000 rounds hit. I've spent hours on mods tuning this effect and it's not easily replicated. Worse, gun allocation is poor, there is some internal gun to target distribution that makes dual purpose weapons stupid. For example if close range to a high surface threat, in dual purpose it will use first come first served target allocation. It's going to be an issue when you see 18 inch guns and 5 inch guns together and 5 inches target the ship and 18 sits doing nothing.

Hi @Derbroomaster. So, my set up is that I have one touch screen onto which I display my swappable MFDs - so get pilots in the pilots station and CPGs when in the CPG station, and a standard 11.6 screen (non touch) that I have mounted a pair of tm cougars and display the CPG MFD only. On the 11.6 the CPGs don't swap - but obviously I can see them when sat in the pilots station, plus the pilots mfds on my touch. I have attached my lua - which might explain things - but I use a mixture of the helios export and a standard monitor set up - as things changed in DCS a few months ago so you don't necessarily need the patches. In addition - I have not installed patches for the pilots MFDs - so they keep the standard naming out of DCS (LEFT_MFCD & RIGHT_MFCD): I think I have been in this scenario before - but in essence you cannot display all 4 screens and expect them all to swap etc. Lua transcript below and attached - which I hope helps. _ = function(p) return p end name = _('Heliosa') description = 'Generated from Helios Profile CBI3' A_10C_2_CDU_SCREEN = { x = 3980, y = 62, width = 355, height = 276 } A_10C_2_RWR_SCREEN = { x = 5061, y = 302, width = 227, height = 227 } AH_64D_EUFD_PLT = { x = 4604, y = 15, width = 358, height = 177 } TEDAC = { x = 4578, y = 567, width = 440, height = 440 } Viewports = { Center = { x = -960, y = 0, width = 4800, height = 1080, aspect = 4800/1080, useAbsoluteFOV = false, FOV = 0.9428571428571429, useAbsoluteAnglesShift = false, viewDx = 0, viewDy = 0 } } --///////////////////////////////////// --A10C2 --///////////////////////////////////// function reconfigure_for_unit(unit_type) if unit_type == "A-10C_2" then LEFT_MFCD = { x = 5766; y = 148; width = 832; height = 832; } RIGHT_MFCD = { x = 6847; y = 148; width = 832; height = 832; } --///////////////////////////////////// --AH64D --///////////////////////////////////// elseif unit_type == "AH-64D_BLK_II" then AH_64D_LEFT_MFCD_CPG = { x = 5766; y = 148; width = 832; height = 832; } AH_64D_RIGHT_MFCD_CPG = { x = 6847; y = 148; width = 832; height = 832; } LEFT_MFCD = { x = 3921; y = 90; width = 487; height = 488; } RIGHT_MFCD = { x = 5181; y = 90; width = 487; height = 488; } --/////////////////////////////////////// --Flaming Cliffs --/////////////////////////////////////// else LEFT_MFCD = { x = 5766; y = 148; width = 832; height = 832; } RIGHT_MFCD = { x = 6847; y = 148; width = 832; height = 832; } end end UI = { x = 0, y = 0, width = 3840, height = 1080 } UIMainView = { x = 0, y = 0, width = 3840, height = 1080 } GU_MAIN_VIEWPORT = Viewports.Center HeliosFinal.lua

These units were done by M3L, the 3rd party developer of the F4U to support their module. Not ED

Although not explicitly stated in the news letter, we can infer from the forum position that this will be EDs module. That's important when looking at development time and features, what's coming is fairly predictable.

leider nix dabei, was ich such .... danke dir dennoch

Only Mother can love that Quasimodo...

Да было бы за что. Вчера проверил - летит всё как надо. Без захвата - ракета бегает за "3м крестиком". С захватом - летит, как мне показалось, чуть ниже крестика. Поэтому лучше брать повыше. Но это надо посидеть с этим, попрактиковаться.