All Activity

Hi ED, I thought this was a problem in the past that was resolved, but maybe it wasn't or there was a regression based on this old post (https://forum.dcs.world/topic/312725-harm-seeker-sees-radars-in-too-even-when-they-are-turned-off I believe this is true in the 18 as well (based on earlier thread) and a general HARM issue. DCS Version: DCS 2.9.18.12722 Reproduction: * Set up HAS for BB, SD, P, HK * Launch one harm at each target at > 30nm * setEmission Off via F10 menu * Note that RWR indications are removed as they are off * HARMs continue and precisely hit all 4 targets Video: Track: harm-emission-off-tracking.trk Thanks, MartinCo harms.miz

Even if RB violated a contract, that doesn't mean that the damages are greater than money that RB is supposed to get. For example, imagine that you broke a laptop charger at work and you are liable to pay the cost. Then it would not be reasonable for the company to dock you many thousands of dollars/euros, when the charger costs way less than that. Ah, so you KNOW* things. * = making stuff up We don't know how reasonable or unreasonable that contract is. Any reasonable person, but not necessarily you, can understand a contract can have unacceptable provisions. Except that is also not how it works, except in your mind.

Пришла всякая фигня для диорам с Китая. Самоходку взял посмотреть потому как она "ЛЕГО" но в масштабе. Собрал вчера по быстрому "на коленке" пока фильм смотрел. На удивление своих денег в принципе стоит. Можно при желании даже довести до приличного состояния убрав лишние швы и замазав утяжины ведром шпаклёвки. Главное на 100% соответствует прототипу по внешнему виду. А вот по размеру не уверен. Визуально выглядит немного больше своего прародителя 4-ки от "Моделиста" отливок старой Италери как я понимаю. Их обоих ещё нужно линейкой замерять чего я естественно никогда не делал. Опель Блиц за 300 р. взял второй что бы не сломать первый тот что зелёный. Хотел ему в кузов бочки эти положить а тент так плотно сел что не сломав его уже не снять. Решил останется зелёный для Европы, крытый, а открытый кузов тот что жёлтый будет для Африки. Американский грузовичок тоже взял посмотреть качество изготовления так сказать. Обе машины позже как нить сравню с их братьями от РАДОНа и Академии соответственно что были куплены ранее.

I can't believe how many people fail to grasp this. I do understand the frustration of Steam users, while I don't understand why most of them seems to believe that the E is refunded for cash, when it's not. (I wonder who pays the 3rd parties, if a refunded user chooses to get a non-ED module).

Nope, it is still incorrectly implemented, yet bug reports about it are marked "correct-as-is" in the DCS F-16C bug section. I've been thinking about writing a full length bug report regarding the AN/ALR-56M, but I honestly don't know what difference it'd make. Feels like kicking water uphill at this point. I actually gave praise to the DCS F-16C manual in an old post I made (linked below) for correctly describing the AN/ALR-56M's functionality, even though it had been incorrectly implemented in-game. However, ED has since rewritten and removed certain sections, words and illustrations from the DCS F-16C manual regarding the AN/ALR-56M, so that the manual better describes the current incorrect implementation, rather than fixing the AN/ALR-56M's in-game implementation so that it matched both the DCS and real world manuals. I think it's quite clear at this point, based on ED's actions, that their intention is to leave the AN/ALR-56M as-is.

That seemed to do the trick, thanks a lot for the pointer!

Hey guys, I was wondering if someone could tell me how this is done in RL. I am not talking about the process - that is described well in the manual - but more like where do you align in the mission overall process : - is there a specific spot on the airbase where you can use object to align ? - is it done in the arming area when taxiing out ? - is it done in the hangar ? - is it often done in the air (difficult to imagine that you boresight in your AO especially in a hot run in to target). And as a follow up: How would you incorporate that in your mission design with the ME? Simply put an abject so you can align (lock) onto ? If someone has an inside on that please let me know (any link is also appreciated) Many thanks for the help/exlainations Spidierox

As per title, the Hud has become unreadable: Using the rheostat to decrease brightness make things even worse: Suggestions? Best regards. dcs.log

Of course. So do I. But I also want the capabilities they bring. I enjoy doing IMC terrain following in the F-15E. but not because it is an F-15E necessarily. I like the variety of mission profile as much as the variety in aircraft type.

Care to explain how that money magically appear in said claimed account? And if it even exists? Excuse me? It seems both parties agreed and actually signed an agreement back in late 2024, or are you referring to that "video"?

I know that AI helos in the Player group will just stay on the ground until the player takes off. But how can I get a whole AI group of helos to wait until certain conditions are met, and then take off? Especially wait on ground after cold start. I know I can make them spawn in air then land and wait, but...it doesn't look...smooth...so... I've given these a shot, and none of them seem to work: 1) I set the option - Prefer Take Off/Land Vertically to false, and then put an obstacle on the taxiway. 2) I set Embarking at way point 0, trying to make it wait for the troops. If anyone's got any ideas, I'd be really thankful if they'd share 'em.

Hello, any progress with sounds? It´s been two years since I listen to (for example) totally corrupted AI-9V APU sound. Two years. Just rollback old sounds please or give us some valid info about it. This state is totally inapropriate to other qualities of this module. Thanks Jiri

Ok, that´s probably also a way of looking at it. What triggers me about it, is the fact, that the switch is OFF-ON-BYPASS instead of BYPASS-OFF-ON. See what I mean...? Anyways, it´s not a big deal...

Don't think it ever went to court.

+1

+1 Mirage F1 Hud is unreadable. (2560x1440)

Ouch, that's a bummer. Seemed to be the easy fix in other threads. Could it be a special case with the Harrier since it actually doesn't trap? Well, we'll cross our fingers for a fix. Cheers!

ED is not refunding money. Is giving store credits. And there is no money in any escrow account as the oficial statement says. There is an agreement since 2024 not fulfilled by BOTH parts.

The problem with this is that people want the F-15E, Mirage, MiG-19 and Harrier. Do you know what that will take? Becuse I don't. Now unless that happens we're left with two options lose the aircraft or another developer produces some modules.

Thank you for all your efforts cfrag! I hope whatever you find in the meantime goes well.

Hello, I tested it...No effect... It would appear that this is a DCS bug that has been identified and is currently being investigated.

I did more tests with the F4U and the F14, and based on my observations, I can confirm that a carrier trap will not cause a crash, only if an inbound contact has been made beforehand (as so previously reported by @Scotch75 and others).

Mission editor ESSEX code ESS on 252.00 MHz F4U-1D ARR2 on 252.00 MHz In single player The F4U-1D is south of the ESSEX carrier and flying northeast. I'm receiving ESS Morse code from the aircraft carrier, but I'm receiving the letters O, R, N, and U in succession while flying northeast. I should be receiving the letters R, O, H, and T. No mods on my DCS installation. Radio-nav.trk

Ok. So could you please go to "debug option" and tick "debug message in log...", select also debanding, save mod option, relaunch game, go to cockpit, then go to "debug" VREM menu, push button "capture frame", set the option "display stencil mask" on, have a look in VR, set this option off and quit game. Then post here reshade.log, DCS_VREM.ini, DCS_VREM_techniques.ini as your "option.lua" file and report if you saw the mask (red, green, blues areas) on all eyes/all regions.

POKER and CHAOS are not in the same group, causing POKER to be a green icon on the HDS and not a blue icon as a member of the player flight. POKER is correctly setup, but CHAOS has the same callsign as POKER, but a different group name.