All Activity

It's reasonable to doubt the validity of that. If they're legally not able to discuss, why were they able to claim RB violated IP? If they're muzzled, why were they able to say they've signed an agreement? If the agreement hasn't been implemented as they claim on discord, why can't they discuss it? That cherrypicking more than anything else has soured my viewpoint of ED, and they've been doing it since the start.

Thanks @cfrag! Hope there's a better solution down the line! Cheers!

I do get crashes on modern syria as frequently as modern caucasus. Cold War Syria is very rare.

This kind of armchair level, spurious legal expertise is why this thread is where it is every day. Time and time and time again it’s repeated here that what is going to be said has been said, yet you continue to regurgitate the same things as though by typing it for the 400th time you’ll force a change in reality. Do yourself a favour and go look at some sky.

You know what’s funny? The only group that’s made money through this entire ordeal is ED.

You know what makes me the angriest about this whole thing? Having to defend ED. Those who know, know. ED is like Lockheed Martin: they dont care about your opinion so long as the job gets done and it sells. I REALLY hate it when ED is in the right, so quit making me defend ED. But Id get mad if someone was using me to make money -on my dime, with my company vehicles and tools, with my customer contracts - as a side gig without my knowledge, blessing, or my benefit.

Beeing extremely educated, yes, very poorly

this whole thing has been handled so poorly.

ok what was the beeping noise pattern?

unreal.

Ahhh, but after the Hawk debacle they fixed it so that can't happen again. Still have my user manual for the Hawk; it was a fun bird...totally get why those mercenary pilots from Oman thought they could shoot through the hanger bay doors on the Connie!

Thanks for the link Those Sampan and junks are beautiful ! Alas it seems that they cannot sink ... they are destroyed with rockets but there no way to see it : junks don't disappear at all or don't have any damage model ... Sinking should be enough for me A small drawback too is that it seems to be impossible to put live boat on my NAM rivers only statics but it's not a big problem for me. It could be a nice hidden harbor addons ! We are waiting for you new version impatiently thanks

Its over. If they dont want to say it now they will be forced by reality soon. Just people cant swallow all in one bite.

......you're like a broken record. You and others are not going to get the answers you want no matter how many times you ask it. Once side seems to stick to that confidentiality agreement rigidly, and the and has buttoned up and the pro Razbam crowd hate them for that, the other side has at least on 3 occasions in 2025 breached this alleged confidentiality clause, claimed there has been no communications, and no settlement/agreement reached and used the court of public opinion to fight their cause..the pro ED crowd hate them for that. It's comedy gold really.

Thanks, almost! What @Art-J says. I believe the Forum did this automatically a couple of years ago and this catches people off guard! Cheers!

I had the same problem. I couldnt find the technical because i looked in the wrong area where i thought the marina was and where the pilot went down. @baltic_dragon, minor bug. Tacan 36X for Bear works in the beginning, but i noticed it had dropped out when i was on my way home. I tried 30X, 34X and 36X. Could not dial Bear in again. First technical east of the factory gets partly damaged by the JDAM's. That is likely not intended.

I cannot get the tankers to respond whatsoever after the last update.

Call in for every flight or just the first flight? In other words, if you have a multiplayer wing and 12 players coming in to land, if the first one calls in, can everyone land without a crash or does every flight have to call in independently?

Keep in mind it's a HUGE rudder.

Yet allegedly you've written more on Discord than you have shared here: So is that indeed a message that you wrote and if so, why can you explicitly state on Discord that the agreement is "not being implemented right now," but are not willing to write it here?

I’m not asking ED to cover Steam’s cut. I’m asking them to acknowledge that Steam customers deserve the same basic fairness as E-shop customers. They chose to sell on Steam, they benefited from the wider audience and visibility, and with that comes responsibility. If they can't offer a full refund, fine... but offering nothing while E-shop users get credit isn't right. We're not asking for special treatment, just equal respect as paying customers. This isn’t just about money. It’s about trust.

I am over it. ED says “alleged”, Razbam says “alleged.” It’s a he said / she said, and it is moronic. At this point it is ED’s problem. If the modules stop working (some already have, AV-8B JTAC ATHS for example hasn’t worked for months), what will ED do? Refunds? What is the plan?

We are acting in good faith on the agreement, yes. Sorry, in my head, we shouldn't have to say that, but I understand why you all need to hear it. This is not actually a direct answer to the question. 'Acting in good faith' can still mean that ED diverged from their obligations under the settlement agreement, but did so in a way that you consider to be for a good reason and thus still acting in good faith. For example, let's say that I'm obligated to show up at work at 9 o'clock every day, but one day I get into a car accident and am not able to make it in time. Then I can argue that I got to work as soon as reasonably possible and I thus acted in good faith, but my employer would also have a point that the contract wasn't followed. So then you can get into the murky area of whether the situation truly was a 'force majeure' and the question how this has to be handled. So did ED follow the settlement contract to the letter, or not?

As long as you call inbound to the carrier it's not broken. If you don't, then yes you can get a CTD on landing with current build. And that's why the "5 minutes" of testing probably didn't catch this. I automatically called in when I was testing after seeing reports of this and I had no problem landing. Until someone figured out this was cause I couldn't recreate it. Once I stopped calling in then I could reproduce it.

Hi, we get tagged hundreds of times in a week and we can miss some, its always better to send us a dm or message us on discord for third party forum requests. thank you