All Activity

Hi, Firstly I'm very much enjoying the challenge but I think there maybe an issue with mission 13. The issue:- On approach to the refuelling tanker both baskets are already deployed. On the first refuel, the mission advice suggests using the starboard basket. I approach the starboard basket following the pre-contact message. I cannot connect, I get the breakaway advice - which I ignore - but I still cannot connect. It looks to me that I should have a successful connection. My wingman makes no attempt to refuel on the left basket. I move across to the left basket and successfully refuel. I disconnect but again my wingman makes no move to refuel. Ultimately the game times out with a mission fail. Your thoughts? Regards BK.

Hm, this is interesting. I'll have a look and will try to get to the bottom of this. In principle yes - if you miss your assigned target, then wingman will be tasked with taking it out. But I am not clear about the procedure, it should look like this: 1) You are tasked with attacking the lead APC, your wingman attacks the trailing one (simultaneously) 2) If you hit a wrong vehicle or don't hit anything you are tasked with attacking again. 3) If you miss again, then Devil 22 is tasked with destroying it. 4) Then you are told to attack the Gundish. If you fail, you are told to reattack. If you can't or miss again then the wingman takes care of the gun dish. 5) When gun dish is killed, you receive another target - tanks. But the campaign checks how many ordnance each of you have left and assigns targets according to the count (you first, then your wingman until he runs out). Which brings me to a question: did you alter your or wingman's loadout for the mission? 6) Then when you are both out of GBUs, there is a tasking to attack the trucks (it is always Devil 22 that gets this task). @Aerovenator can you look at the list above and tell me how your mission flows in relation to it? That will help me troubleshoot the problem.

Just bought a PSVR2 will be here tomorrow not looking for super sharp but Blacks I am more interested in for night missions I miss the look of the CV1.

It would have been so cool with Sound Tracing, like Ray Tracing but with sound.

Да, это так. Просто мне показалось странным, что при ручном вмешательстве в управление ядрами, он всё-таки справляется. Но это всё очень нестабильно. Добиться именно стабильного перформанса на нём так и не получилось. То всё шло довольно плавно, но в любой момент могло снова начать фризить. Более современный процессор решил для меня эту проблему окончательно. Для себя понял - что вдяхи, память - это всё конечно хорошо, но главное для хорошей производительности - это процессор. Без этого любые другие апгрейды смысла не имеют.

That's what we do in our servers. We have SRS installed but being an external solution is not without issues. Specially for new pilots. I don't care about splitting audio by faction (we play mostly PVE) so we have that turned off. MIDS is a big thing, record stuff, the ability to have LOATC, ATIS, etc.... Well.. it seems they won`t post any roadmap so we will continue with SRS.....

That’s what I got from it as well. Not that it is a problem: it is a system designed to face the threats of that era. It would only need to be careful when facing F-14s (and DCS can’t replicate the Phoenix’s specific guidance anyway so who knows how it would behave).

Hm idk. Have you seen the interview, ED talked specifically about the RWR and active missiles. The way they describe it makes it sound like the SPO-15 is hardly capable to detect active missiles, let alone have specific warnings: https://flyandwire.com/2025/09/04/mig-29s-spo-15-rwr-qa-with-eagle-dynamics/

Do we have Christen Eagle II / Yak-52 pilots who would like to race? I'm thing about setting up a mono-class race at Las Vegas Speedway but not sure if there are enough pilots who would like to take part in it. Please like this post if you are there and would like to participate.

Есть ли среди нас пилоты на Christen Eagle / Як-52, кто хочет погонять? Хочу провести моно-класс гонку на Las Vegas Speedway, но не понятно есть ли интерес к этим крафтам. Можете просто лайкнуть это пост если отвечать в треде лень

According to the Airport diagram slot 19 is the apron to the north. As indicated in the screenshot, which it not the original slot

То есть намек, что полет на косой обдувке и висение на прямой это желчь? Оригинально, однако. Тогда прямым текстом. Потолок висения вертолета и практический потолок полета очень сильно различаются. Приводить в аргумент, что вертолеты в Афгане ЛЕТАЛИ на высотах в 5 000 метров, как аргумент что вы не можете ВЗЛЕТЕТЬ ПО ВЕРТОЛЕТНОМУ, то есть ВИСЕТЬ, совершенно не правильно. На 5 км я на нашей восьмерке вполне уверенно залезал и не раз. А вот на счет висения... Вы бы вопросы задавали правильно. Температуру НВ, давление, направление и скорость ветра, массу, способ взлета. Есть ли ЭВУ. Включена ли ПОС. ПЗУ. В конце концов что выставлено в "степени изношенности двигателей вертолета". А уж потом рассчитывали бы на конструктивный ответ. А то "вес пустой".... По определению "вес пустого" это вес без топлива. Куда вы собираетесь лететь и взлетать без топлива вопрос большой.

Maybe this is old news, but why does Pimax want to know my location, where my PC is at, at all times when I turn my PC on? The installed Pimax software literary checks my location every single minute my PC is on and online. Every single minute. Why? I came over this just by accident and have now turned off location services from Windows for the time being. I have checked the history for this for the last week now, and only Pimax is listed as a app that checks my location. And it checks this every single minute. Waste of resources, and there's a privacy concern in this too I think. @Calvin.Pimax Why do you need to know this? And why check it for every minute that passes?

Thank you very much @silverdevil ! I couldn't see that in the logs. I'm indeed using reshade to brighten up my exported MFDs - Doing a repair of reshade solved my issue !

Having worked with the map for a while I ran into some question: 1. Will we see a full rework of the Autobahn road system? At the moment it is but a shadow of its original glory and size. 4-8 lane roads with center split being reduced to meager 4 lane with a center line is pathetic. Also seeing the Autobahn runway at Adelsheim that snuck into the ME we have an almost double as wide road with a clear centerline as base (~75ft compared to ~45ft). 2. Would it be possible to link the preadded vehicles (hot-air balloons, military trains, border cars, combines and hovercrafts) to civilian traffic? While they are pretty to look at when flying on an empty map they tend to ruin custom built missions with random clutter that feels very out of place. Especially the hovercrafts and train near Brocken. null

Слушай, вижу, твоя желчь уже через край льётся. Твои ответы - пустая словесная шелуха. Комментарии по делу были бы куда ценнее. Не трать своё диванное время

Sorry i use an online translator. Hi If there is something that annoys me, it’s when someone asks for help in the style "Please, i need help" and that responses are given (good or bad), that the same person, who regularly returns to the forum, does not respond even like "thank you, I look at that and come back to you" and well it annoys me to the highest degree. Of course, it may be that the person has barriers but if you click on the name of this person and see that they have come several times to the forum.... Have a good day Christian

Yes me too! Cheers F-4-E landing .trk

I use 4 screen setup in DCS -Video of my problem - something is forcing main DCS game window to move to my monitor#4 Other details in a post

Me lo auguro ma con DCS non metto mai la mano sul fuoco ci sono moduli che sono stati ANNI in procinto di uscire…

- Hummer issue now fixed - On landing player receives ON SCREEN MESSAGE - RETURN TO ORIGINAL PARKING SLOT (19). Thats what its called in the mission editor, does the Incirlk Airport diagram differ? On checking the Airport Diagram is way incomplete. On Airport Diagram PLAYER is located in the GOLF section although it seems unnumbered Thanks for the reports and sorry for the wacky hummer races Regards LG

I’ve used the HP G2 (and the G1 before it) and the PSVR2 and I would say; - Comfort - the G2 is a bit heavier on the face but sits on the head better than the PSVR2, so both have pros and cons, with the globular cluster though the PSVR2 is super comfortable and being light is a big plus - Colours - no doubt better on the PSVR2, OLED is just so much better than LCD when it comes to colour and contrast - Resolution - here the G2 has the PSVR2 beat. The G2 has a higher resolution display and that display is full RGB stripe so things are sharper. Both suffer from having older fresnel lens designs so have relatively narrow sweet spots. - Depth perception - is probably a bit better on the PSVR2 - Performance - now this is a tough one. Because you can run the G2 at 60Hz, and you don’t need to supersample as much without foveated rendering the G2 has better performance. You simply don’t need to pump as many pixels as quickly to get a similarly sharp image. However with dynamic foveated rendering that performance gap can be bridged and overcome. Which is better? Some will say the G2, particularly if sharp image is the priority, for others though the colours and DFR on the PSVR2 will win out.

Are you saying when in TP mode and switching from TP to RL leading it would show aspect arrow? And, a recent video makes it appear that the aspect arrow changes in length. By any chance, do you know if the aspect arrow actually changes length in relation to target speed? It would make sense as there is no other indication of the speed of a locked target.

Still, a real RIO would probably call that out, since this is is closely related to his most important job anyways (maintain situational awareness beyond visual range). Also communication is prime. I think OP doesn't ask for that because it is needed, but because it would be immersive.