...

Por lo general, los portátiles no están optimizados para mover DCS desde hace bastantes versiones. Los procesadores y las gráficas de un portátil no rinden igual que las mismas especificaciones en sobremesa. Tuve el mismo problema hasta que me pasé a torre. No es lo mismo un procesador i7K que un procesador i7HQ, este último rinde muchísimo peor. Que no nos vendan la moto con los portátiles, por muy gaming que sean, porque la refrigeración no les permite dar el 100%, salvo excepciones de pepinos que superarán los 3.000 euros.

Después de designar al último objetivo hay que pulsar (S) undesignate y volver a stores para seleccionar todas las estaciones. Como es largo de explicar, te dejo el tutorial.

Balance can be obtained on servers. Hornet's AGM-154C are restricted on some servers because they have the ability to disarm the enemy in half an hour when there are no players defending airspace

Although he is not an airplane that represents me, he is a great fighter and also has the ability to operate on aircraft carriers. I support the petition because he is a great fighter and I want to support the neighboring community of France. The classification is no longer an excuse, the F-16 is operational and the Eurofigther is on the way. My vote is yes.

You would see a f5 at 2 miles in real size, but as I said before, realism has to somehow adapt to the simulation within reason, considering that everything a pilot sees in real size, we see it at a smallest scale within a monitor. I don't want to fly with tags, but I also don't want to fly blind. I see everything well like this. Anyway, I've never seen contacts in DCS more than 10 miles away unless I know they are there. It is like the scratch on the new car, nobody sees it except the owner who knows where it is.

I see it well as it is. But I would not like to add difficulty. Currently I see it well without labels and without points.

I also bet on realism. But we need to see that pixel, because we are not in a real size environment, but in a 70% smaller scale environment with 34-inch monitors without peripheral vision. I don't see anything at actual size and resolution. Therefore, the pixel is completely justified. Do you see the DCS moon the same size on your monitor as looking out your window?

For me the Supercarrier is perfect, I guess because I have never operated a real one and I cannot compare. But everything I see so far has exceeded my expectations.

Units C.15-50 and C.15-60 of wing 12 that have numeral of wing 15 also fail. [ATTACH]239938[/ATTACH] Here are the fixes, I hope ED includes them in the next update. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18F45YAQ9eDLwJjYNSJ6odMdP9KgmVNJ0?usp=sharing These textures correct the error and improve identifying details. I give them to the development team to save them work.

Although I think this version is quite good, it would also pay for a graphic and technological update. We need RWR and although the crew animations are good, I think they still look like dolls. For me it is very important that the crystals have reflections, scratches and dirt, it really seems that there is something between the pilot and the exterior. EDIT: I forgot to say, please remove the glow from the fuselage of the combat UH-1H and keep the brightness on the Civil UH-1H.

No.

I think we have to check the damage to the infantry. Two rockets at 5 meters do not kill a soldier.

Thanks for the recent updates. Sometimes there are improvements not reported in the newsletter, like enhancing the stars with a gradient effect. Thanks development team. EDIT: The sky at night is now perfect.

Two days ago I reported that the troop dispatch was still failing. After reviewing the mission in the editor, I said, well I found the problem, the (transportable) box is disabled, so I went back to the thread to delete my message. Today the troops failed again, I went back to the editor and realized that for some reason the (transportable) box is being automatically deactivated. Forgive my English, I have explained it to the best of my ability through the translator.

Currently the Spanish armed forces are made up of many American-made aircraft. The F-5, the Hornet, the UH-1H and I would also like to have the UH-1N. https://www.aviationcorner.net/public/photos/9/9/avc_00448799.jpg

Million of thanks.:thumbup:

I have tried to take off again after landing, rearming and refueling, but if I don't turn the engines off and back on again, the deck crew won't reactivate.

Solved. Successfully downloaded, thank you. :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

I have tried to do a clean install and the installer tells me this mid-download: 00780.439 ERROR: Failed to download Bazar/shaders/fxo/fxo.zip 00780.439 ERROR: Got HTTP 404 Not Found 00780.442 INFO : MKDIR C:\Program Files\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\_downloads\Bazar/Liveries/P-51D/Canada RAF 442 Sqdn/ 00780.476 ERROR: Failed to download Bazar/shaders/fxo/fxo.zip 00780.476 ERROR: Got HTTP 404 Not Found 00780.527 ERROR: Failed to download Bazar/shaders/fxo/fxo.zip 00780.527 ERROR: Got HTTP 404 Not Found 00780.527 ERROR: 11 connection fails 00780.751 ERROR: Server capacity may be limited at the moment. Please, try again later. 01040.282 === Log closed. EDIT: My antivirus is Windows basic: Windows Defender

I do not place static objects in transit places, I leave the road clear.

With the Hornet: I managed to land between Cable 1 and Cable 3 the first time 90% of the time with a € 50 joystick. 10% of the time they are frustrated attempts that I manage to recover in the following two approaches. With the Supercarrier I do much better.

I've only got the LSO view, F9 EDIT: (Landing Sign Officer View) I have changed it because I have F9 assigned to TrackIR

I join the thank you messages

Low FPS on deck, but it is logical, I have a GTX1060 and 16GB 30 fps in the supercarrier, 70 fps in the open sea, 50 fps in the rest of the stage. Default high settings.

It asks me to enter the serial numbers of the Persian Gulf and Hornet, which do not have a serial number and says that the modules are not authorized in my account. Fixed up!