Ala13_ManOWar

Very good review of FS24 expo. Spanish but subs are available. It says (for the mate asking) the Winwing base will have bigger motors than Moza, and I'm curious too about that since I fly with stick extensions and now it's a must for me.

The Moza option is really appealing just because it'll be compatible with the current TM we have. Other bases, well I'm not sure they will unless TM releases their own FFB base in a sensible time frame, though, comparing to how long they took to release their own metal base when we've had Virpil, VKB, Winwing (any others?) for how long, 3? 4 years now? well, hope they react quick, but I'm not sure about that knowing usual response times from TM to the markets eating their toast since quite a time. Yep, I've seen other reviews about the Moza base being relatively "poor" in options, though those reviews happened in a pre-release base, and software is just software after all, subject to change and being enhanced. Hope so, at least. But the compatibility thing makes it really nice to me not having to change all of my previous stuff but just the base, TBH . Anyhow, I guess I'll wait for more reviews before purchasing. Despite the good name the brand apparently has, since I'm not into racing I've never known any of their previous hardware (but it all looks stunning, to be truth). Hope the Wingwin option is here sooner than later and we know more about it, I hardly doubt they'll make it TM compatible anyway so overall price increases.

My bet is two weeks™, perhaps whenever it's ready

Yeah, the idea might be that one, the reality though was we all installed open beta just to see the latest content sooner while those banshees forgot it was an open beta like 1 minute after install and howled all around all the time. I don't think they are that much, not even the majority of people, probably even a just few, but howled quite aloud making a deep earworm in those who heard them. BTW, don't know when, but amazing news about that middle Europe map!! makes all the sense with the incoming MiG-29A!

Small trailer from some mission we got a couple days ago, S!

Next update, if I'm not mistaken.

Thanks for the clarification Rudel!! I was talking by memory and who knows so many years later what's correct about that or not. Still, I wasn't that carried away .

Not to mention you would be as wasted in front of your enemies with that version as with the one we have. The plane is what it is, a 1941 airframe which mostly kept its performance well into 1945 without major changes aside from D and Ta versions. I like 190, but enthusiasts have to face that reality and fact.

Negative mate, MiG-21 (2014) was a module from even before everything of that. Heatblur didn't "make" the MiG-21, it was already there, they helped for sure in some cleaning and later coding at some point, I wouldn't know (so wouldn't you unless you were in the team, right?) the exact things they did but I believe the split team later known as Heatblur only joined Leatherneck after the MiG-21 was released and it was successful so they could hire more people. HB aided in the Leatherneck's Viggen module, and was there in the Leatherneck Tomcat by the way . So, they're capable for sure, just without more people to help they apparently remain a very small team, and I believe we can expect great things from them because we've already seen them in the past, not the other way around. You negative people always look for the blemish in others while you're blind to other's huge faults mate, don't you really get exhausted from that attitude?

Yeah, all my writing becomes useless if anybody reads it or tries to understand what I was saying .

Yep, so not the plastic ruler we all got nowadays . I believe it was early iterations, like the ones I mentioned, just different calculations in different rulers instead of a single one like modern examples. Even some calculations aren't the same, I believe E6B, and CR-3 as well, developed new calculations to fit into the single ruler, CR-3 even a few more than classic E6B. So, just rounded computer/calculator/ruler instead (or on top of) the straight ones, they serve similar purposes and these kind of instrument dates back to XIX century, IIRC. So, I'm just saying, don't expect the exact modern one you have in your hand, it's a different kind even the ones with the similar name.

Nope, I've seen WWII aviation rulers/calculators and E6B wasn't in the pilot/navigator's equipment. There were other rulers, like an E6B but separated instead of all in one as it is, you can see them/buy them in ebay, but E6B in WWII as a common equipment? Never saw it.

Actually it'd be nice, but E-6B o CR-3 didn't exist back then, it'd be cheating .

I'm sure it was, I'm just telling what happened while I was watching . The inners of it are unknown to me. And probably the 2009 BS1, which I bought in a DVD, was released later in my country (~June 2009) than other places, which was still the usual back then (hard copies distribution and all). When it all started to be in the cloud and downloadable (2012 P-51 first actual module, only downloadable version available), it all started to be synchronized to us all, but until then it wasn't necessarily the case.

Actually, BS1 happened in 2009, A-10C in 2010, and DCS World (not called like that at first) started in 2011 when a patch made those two "modules", back then still independent games, compatible online between them. Yes, day one here, but Flanker 2.5, Lock On, FC 1 and 2 where also around there.

Looks great, indeed. Eager to see it in my computer .

Beautiful landing mate .

Yes, totally, and what about the great and marvellous ritual of bearing with the bugs you just bought for ever when there never were patches at all .

Yeah, I get it, but bear in mind that "seven years development" rhetoric is just something people say, it's part of the hype created by some people, not the real thing and certainly not teasing and hype created by the company, not at all. M3 haven't teased us or created that hype mate, it's people who made it happen. The third party might have said time ago that they were looking forward into creating an F4U module, so long time ago it was even another company named Leatherneck and had many more people in it as already mentioned here. Changes in the company made them take a bit more of time than they could have expected, yep, totally, but those changes weren't even up to them but to other praised (rightly so, don't get me wrong) third party out there. That's a very different story than "M3 company is working on the module since 7 years ago and they didn't deliver yet". They couldn't have been working 7 years on it because M3 didn't even exist 7 years ago in the first place mate... M3 never really teased us, just communicated their intentions, what they were trying to do, just that, and really started working with their limited resources maybe 3-4 years ago. The hype came later with people imagining things the company never said. Funnily enough the hype didn't even exist 7 years ago, so many people weren't that happy about a Corsair in DCS, they just thought it useless and another orphan module, if you remember those times (I do). And remember about all of that, yes, I'm still eager to see this module in DCS, but that eagerness is just mine, they didn't made me eager, expectations make people eager, sometimes unrealistic expectations and too much talking. So why would I blame them for something I created myself? That's what many users do, blame the company for their unrealistic expectations and hype they created on their own. Just that. It's human psychology apparently, but one I don't share, and one I don't like to be honest.

We await for it!! Looking good Maligno .

Forum account, I guess contact some moderator/admin. Gaming and store account, you've a button in your profile, but your modules will get lost. You can transfer them though if you're shutting down the account.

Hmmm, yes, Ok, agree teasers should be treated more carefully. I don't recall many teasers about the Corsair yet though, not alike other happy trigger third parties for sure (remember the social media and teasing info is only up to the third party, not to ED or the whole game). Yes, the time should be correct for the teasers trailers and all that stuff, totally agree and I'm no expert in communication to know when the time's right (and anyhow I'm not that eager as others, TBH, but I see it clearly for the noise and hype some people create out of thin air), but I believe aside from a few pics more in the line of "it's coming people, we're still working on it", and that only due to some people saying it's not coming because it's taking long, but still the Corsair hasn't been teased at all the same as other stuff in DCS, at all, so, why the ringing bell again? I believe you're mixing here people's personal feelings and the actual hype and teasing and all they create, but that's people, I haven't seen M3 creating that hype or constantly teasing us at all. So, still I can't see any bell to ring here, it's an upcoming module, it's not there yet, I haven't paid a cent yet, the time I pay good money for it and it's not there it'll ring many bells. Not for me yet, whatsoever. As for right now I just await patiently, and eagerly maybe, yes, because it's a historical and important aircraft for a theatre unseen to the day in DCS and I'd like to have those WWII carrier operations in DCS and that's only me, others maybe it's for different reasons, but bells? I can't hear any. Think of it as this, even if the module, and this is totally a worst case scenario I just bring here, a supposition, gets totally carried away and it finally doesn't make it to DCSW, then... what? it'd be a waste of time, effort and money for the third party. As for me personally (and sorry, for everyone here just awaiting the thing) it wouldn't change my life or anything else. The third party would be the hugely disappointed and wasted for their huge effort for nothing. Me, or any other end user here? It's no real loss, just the eagerness for flying the thing, but then again I never had it before, so why the fuss? They investing their effort, time and resources, including economic resources, would be the only ones really hurt. But we users? Why? I had nothing and I'd have nothing the same, and still without spending a cent. So, bells?

Me alegro. Pues ahora si los quieres de vuelta tendrás que ir poniendo uno a uno a ver cual es el que da el problema.

Prueba a hacer repair, por si ayuda. Quita los mods que tengas puestos, al menos desactívalos por si es alguno el que da problemas.

Well, that's true. But I haven't paid a cent for a Corsair yet, you know. What alarm should it ring exactly? the only one should be the "it's not coming" (which we know untrue, the pics and vids are there, not as often as we'd like, sure, still there) and... I haven't paid a cent yet, the day I'd bought a module and without my money in my hand I got nothing that'll ring a bell for me, sure it will. Until then I can only wish them the best and an as fast as possible release since I'd like to fly that bird for sure. Anyway, the criticism here looks like it's whining about a module have disappeared and they run with my money, or the like. I haven't seen that yet mate. Why would I feel entitled about something I haven't bought yet? Can't understand that part. Eagerness for having it, Ok, complain about not having it like I already paid something... hmmm... nope...