4c Hajduk Veljko

Same here with A-10C. I never fly A-10C but I bought it to support ED and the overall cause of this hobby.

F-22 did not show up for Barksdale 2011 air show a month ago.

I understand that. But, also, one should live within its own means. If there is no money for aerobatic team, then aerobatic team should not exist. There is no shame in being discipline and respect your own financial situation. Aerobatic team is not a necessity and when and if there is better times, Flankers and Fulcrums might fly aerobatics again.

Yak-130 is a new generation aircraft. Maybe, Russia is trying to promote it.

Lemon Lime, Check your PP. =4c= squad requested numbers range from 1400-1499.

And, when are we going to get a Russian aircraft to fly? Five years from now? FC at least has few Russian airplanes, including Frogfoot with AFM. Having FC compatible with DCS makes a lots of sense. It works really well with BS. You can have several different level sims in one, and you can choose to fly what you want according to your level of training.

That is exactly what I want. I mean, the second part.

I'll buy FC3. As soon as it is released.

Because the engines can be used for yaw control. Which is more efficient as well.

:smilewink:

I use two SSD's in RAID 0 (see my sig). Once you try it you will never want to go back. Windows loads very fast, the slowest part of booting it is darn BIOS. Black Shark loads up very fast too.

Beczl, although not clickable, is your MiG-21 cab model a 6DOF compatible?

Looking good!

I know, from confidential sources :smilewink: , that this MiG-21 will be modeled very well. Cant wait to give it a try!!

Of course. Otherwise, AGAT would just put SARH seeker on R-77 body. But R-27-ER is bigger, has much longer range and almost double the explosive of R-77, or for that matter AMRAAM.

Here's Cri Cri on batteries: wRVVdYU1c0M

This is really good news!!

Very nice!!!!

I have to be very careful what I say because I have 50% permanent warning. To respond to your comment I would have to go to the economical and political aspect of the military. I just can not go there. One thing I can say is that Sukhoi has manufactured and sold systems that allow the use of R-77. I don't see any reason why we don't have that in FC. Thus, I fully support 104th mod.

You keep bringing economy to discussion about FC simulation. When I talked economy, I got permanent warning. Russian/Soviet Air Force did not upgrade its Su-27 fleet for two reasons. First, obviously, Russia was short on money. Second, Russia did not need to upgrade, Russia did not fight wars where it needed R-77 capable Flankers. But, there is plenty of evidence that Sukhoi made or upgraded Flankers capable of using R-77. Therefore, it is not a stretch by any means to simulate R-77's on Flankers. Because People like Flankers and Flankers are fully capable of using advanced weapons. Developer decided to model the first generation Flankers and the second generation of Eagle. People want updated Flankers as well. Finally, we could just put India as a Country on the list and then having R-77's on FLankers would be all right?

It is more then obvious that many in FC community are sick and tired of flying first generation Flanker against updated second generation Eagle. I assume ED is busy with DCS and will not update FC Flankers any more. The next DCS fighter is of western origin. Community decided to try to update Flankers to existing Flanker models. Why is that a problem?

Did you talk to ED? They may be willing to provide some info.

I, as well as =4c= squad, fully support the mod. We at =4c= will work closely together with 104th to implement this mod as well as R-27EA mod on both servers.

Pilotasso, what are the dates? You are again confused.

This is further enhancing my statement. Which was that the F-15C as it appeared in 1979 could not fire AMRAAM. It needed, as per your book, "additional signal processor" or per my book, Multiple Stage Improvement Program (MSIP) version II, where the first fully upgraded MSIP rolled out of the hangar in 1985.