Snoopy

True but that also doesn't work 100% of the time in MP.

It's been long time but IIRC that's incorrect the gateway was around before the ARC-210 was added to the real jet. Even if I'm not remembering correctly I think ED could put their resources to better use than to fix something that isn't that big of a deal like have them model the actual gateway so we can see client F-16s or F/A-18s (and maybe add some missing TAD & HMCS symbology:)).

Yes I can read but I'm sorry referencing a response from 2022 ....3 years ago with no updates on status since isn't valid, at least to me. Anyway, based on your responses to me this morning if it's so easy to add the lighting like you are insinuating ED not having it added to the NTTR map by now is ridiculous, other priorities or not. ED can't get timely updates to Iraq or Afghanistan out, no way we're getting any updates to the NTTR map.

Although I agree with you in principle If it’s so easy than why hasn’t it been added almost 4 years after PG?

Really how are you so sure ED has said in the past certain new features/tech for new maps can’t be done to old maps like the NTTR and Caucuses.

The NTTR map is basically abandoned and likely such old “tech” that the only way it gets the latest map features/tech is to start over. Although I would enjoy that. Especially if the map was expanded to include the UTTR up north and other key military locations that should be there now and the coast of cali I don’t see that happening.

So what you're saying is you don't want the gateway modeled in DCS so the A-10 can get Link 16 equipped aircraft data (which to be fair and to your point right now only AI aicraft data is shared not client)? This is the first time I've seen someone report a bug for a feature most want to actually work (i.e. have the gateway modeled so SADL and Link 16 equipped aircraft can talk)

Track? I’ve never had this occur

This, I’ve spent a few hours in the realms on and talked to many A-10 pilots over the course of my career and they all say they are constantly trimming the jet.

That’s incorrect we carried the sniper all the time in suites older than 7+ when HMCS was introduced. The A-10C never stopped being able to carry it we just didn’t it. We carried sniper only at Moody until around 2012ish.

Cool, all I know is the units I've been a part of and/or visited the last few years aren't using them (Moody, Whiteman, & DM). And soon you won't get to see it in your back yard at all since they're divesting their A-10s soon IIRC. On the topic of DCS though it isn't going to matter we aren't getting it.

Likely because it's not a plug and play from one airframe to another, even on the real jets. ED does "just enough" to keep the A-10C II viable (how long have we been waiting on the in-cockpit pilot) so I wouldn't expect any additions. Heck we can't even get a simulated gateway to share network information with client Vipers or Hornets (but we can see AI viper & hornet network data last I checked) they're not going to invest the time to develop the Sniper for the A-10C.

That’s incorrect the Sniper pod hasn’t been used regularly in the A-10 community since around 2012. At Moody now and at Whiteman for 2.5 years and I can tell you that isn’t the case at either of these bases.

v303 Fighter squadron Elephant Walk last night before we broke up into our separate flights to knock out student training sorties in B-Course and MQT.

Yes I know bro, I've talked to Nineline multiple times over the years on it. Was simply clarifying your statement on what capabilities should exist for Link-16 and SADL to communicate.

Technically they can through a gateway

Thank you!!

Very nice, will other VFR departures such as A-10 VFR north and west be added eventually?

Well aware of that but doesn’t fix the fact the HAS is to small from what they actually are.

f-4 reference showing the HAS on the western part of Spang are to small. instead of focusing on the A-10 let’s focus on the HAS not being the correct size.

People need to stop focusing on the A-10 and the fact that the HAS on the western part of the airfield are to small. Yes I referenced the A-10 not fitting in my bug report but it is more about the HAS being to small and used the A-10 as a reference.

They didn't build new HASs for the A-10s but thanks for playing LOL Correct and thanks for the picture. Marked as correct as is so guess we're stuck with what we got.

Yeah a quick google earth view and it’s easy to tell which ones are larger