Rainmaker

Its not computing that way. Its why you gots trim.

The computer does the work for you. It’s not going to change the launch sequence, only type. No reason to have to do that anyway.

Essentially. Not leading is just asking for a miss anyway…which none of the aircraft in DCS offer so the technique is essentially the same across the board for all of them which all of them are capable of doing.

Then show up with something more credible than the ‘The DCS C model does X…’. If you enjoy the C’s ability to sit at 45* CPU post stall maneuvering, then fly the crap out of it and enjoy it. Just don't expect someone to listen when that’s all you have to offer as information/data.

If you haven't noticed, I am ignoring your posts as its just drawn out nothing. I’ve said all I’m going to say about the matter. You have two choices, fly it or don’t. If you are expecting things to happen the way you want them to happen, you are going to be sadly disappointed for a very, very long time.

You are the one that said it was wrong there guy. Where is your data at? And no, using the C does not count. By the way....not 30*....or how that works either. Also...still no Didn't even try that hard.

Tracking and lasing are universal for every single one of those aircraft in DCS. Again, same TGP code base.

I run mine at 60 also with a 4090. I end up around only 60% utilization and about 225W of power draw. That's running down the middle of Las Vegas, etc. Love having the overhead to work with. Never see that side view distortion any longer which is awesome.

When it comes to doing this, does anyone happen to know how to possible control the UI rendering size? I am seeing the transparency thing which I can somewhat deal with for now, maybe even see if I could solicit some interest from the RB folks to correct in the future, but it's not a 'big' issue for me at the moment. What I'm not sure I can deal with is having unusable UI areas as I am one of those that has MFD/internal displays so the VR repeater/UI resizes to cover the entire display grouping which is not symmetrical. As a result, the bottom right part of the screen won't allow curser movement. I've tried unchecking the mouse to screen restriction but that makes no difference. Non-VR UI does not extend out past your primary screen unless you want it to, VR doesn't follow the same restriction unfortunately....at least not by default. Not the end of the world if I can't make it work, just curious. null

You completely misunderstand how this works. Other aircraft behave exactly the way Quigon describes. None of them compute any lead release or lasing. They all release in lag of the actual moving target.

Yes. Slew commands inhibit updates, but should update again upon stoppage. Tracking slew should constantly update but that’s the part that’s broken. Right now, it inhibits during all movement.

Realistically you should be leading all of them as none of the pods in DCS compute a leading trajectory for the bomb. As a result, you are always dragging the bomb off its natural trajectory and expending energy. Fortunately, the corrections in DCS are fairly forgiving. when it comes to the -15, CDES should basically provide the same des updates as any of the other jets do, its just bugged at the moment for point track movers as it should be updating unless there is user inputs. Its still not really the ‘best’ way of doing it, but its == to everything else in DCS.

You are not wrong sir. They are dumber than rocks

Well, keep in mind, that CFT difference saves you what...a minute + overall. Not exactly anything that's gonna be a game changer. That's IF I can find data on it one way or the other.

Fair question....and an unknown. Would have to look into it. In reality, they should start filling in concert with the rest of the tanks and not after all the other internals are full...but there is still some incomplete fuel system operations that are not yet modeled.

Improper fuse setting on your part.....nose only selected

Two screenshots taken 1 min apart (see clock). 2600# difference.

You are not even close to understanding how to measure this correctly.

The blu-107 itself is an anomaly/bugged. You have to below like 700 ft or more for it to calc bomb release.

Could have been ED’s AI version and not RB’s I would guess. Not sure if they are still separate or now merged.

Its been an identified thing since release.

What your point with this? There was literally a SEEK Eagle program dedicated to departure prevention. The E model has a digital system and is smarter than a legacy as well. You are trying to nit-pick things and you are lacking a lot of knowledge base here. Enjoy the sim and go fly. This is literally the wrong way to try and justify things. I'm out!

NASA is full of them. Search their site.

1000% false. All of it. You have over 20 units of additional drag and a different engine that consumes more gas. And comparing it to the C that has a very simple engine model is not the way to prove your point here. Wikipedia isn't either. Comparison to something quantifiable in real life would be...which is where the numbers came from. Again, there are no issues there.