Jump to content

Rainmaker

Members
  • Posts

    1493
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rainmaker

  1. Calculated loft cues are not in beta yet. Everything that folks are doing to loft is just a crude method of using a climbing angle and the traditional release cue. The ESL will give you a loaded pull cue and will be more 'proper' for lofting.
  2. I’ll give it a look sometime soon. Thanks for sharing that!
  3. Knew a few back seaters that had them many many moons ago in the -15 world. A few of them also would come back with busted nose bridges from them too. After a while, I saw none of them being used. Have heard they still do exist in the wild, but dunno how many might actually use them. Likely not many.
  4. I think it was a core DCS change a few patches back. Think it’ll still auto-tune? Just have to use actual radio selection though.
  5. It is self-centering, and force sensing in the real bird. As above, the function is correct.
  6. There’s nothing to ‘fix’. It allows for well over the ‘structural’ limit before causing any permanent damage.
  7. Rainmaker

    F-15 ADF

    Correct, no ADF.
  8. It can be used, it’s just not going to be as point and shoot as people want it to be. Positional/altitude errors are going to be a thing unless people are through on their mission planning, etc. It has its limits on both its accuracy depending on how its used but also just in the ability to be able to accurately place the cursors exactly where needed. I feel like people’s issues will stem more from user errors than anything as they try to do things with it for which it was not intended.
  9. IFF modes beyond mode 4 don't exist at this time. Not sure what you are attempting to do…
  10. GPS should not be active in a ‘95 mission for one, so the jet is INS only. I believe the date the Zeus set is for ‘98 or ‘99. For 2, radar is inherently problematic if trying to target for JDAM for multiple reasons.
  11. No. Going to be a DCS limitation of how MERs operate. Its not something that’s going to happen.
  12. It would provide steering, its just not implemented.
  13. Its not computing that way. Its why you gots trim.
  14. The computer does the work for you. It’s not going to change the launch sequence, only type. No reason to have to do that anyway.
  15. Essentially. Not leading is just asking for a miss anyway…which none of the aircraft in DCS offer so the technique is essentially the same across the board for all of them which all of them are capable of doing.
  16. Then show up with something more credible than the ‘The DCS C model does X…’. If you enjoy the C’s ability to sit at 45* CPU post stall maneuvering, then fly the crap out of it and enjoy it. Just don't expect someone to listen when that’s all you have to offer as information/data.
  17. If you haven't noticed, I am ignoring your posts as its just drawn out nothing. I’ve said all I’m going to say about the matter. You have two choices, fly it or don’t. If you are expecting things to happen the way you want them to happen, you are going to be sadly disappointed for a very, very long time.
  18. You are the one that said it was wrong there guy. Where is your data at? And no, using the C does not count. By the way....not 30*....or how that works either. Also...still no Didn't even try that hard.
  19. Tracking and lasing are universal for every single one of those aircraft in DCS. Again, same TGP code base.
  20. I run mine at 60 also with a 4090. I end up around only 60% utilization and about 225W of power draw. That's running down the middle of Las Vegas, etc. Love having the overhead to work with. Never see that side view distortion any longer which is awesome.
×
×
  • Create New...