Despayre

I wouldn't be overly surprised to find out that something built 10 years later, has some improvements over the older plane. However, given that, I'll stick with the Tomcat... turns out, it's not the plane, it's the pilot.

Telephone poles aren't often noted for their nimbleness (and it WAS designed to hit bombers [at long range]!).

Since the previous update, most of the time, Jester just sits back there flipping the laser code's second number, and won't even lock targets. If I eventually manage to lock something, it always misses. Pretty disappointed there's no fix in this latest update.

Above my pay grade.

Also had the same problem yesterday, played a mission I've played many times before from the Instant Action menu (Marianas, Clay Dagger in the Dark), could see the laser code cycling, and Jester would not respond to any targeting commands.

I think you're looking for "Heading Hold GT" (GT = ground track), and good news, it already exists!

Based on that, I'm betting on a missile mod (possibly something else could do it too I suppose) that doesn't have it's weight added correctly, or something similar.

No idea, but I notice your total weight also says "-nan(ind)", weird.

Inside of 20 miles, switch to PAL mode. ("Target Designate fwd/PAL" in the bindings).

That would require ED to do it. Via livery, anyone can do it. If you want ED to handle it, no problem, but it'll be 2 weeks™.

Thanks for the Instant Action Missions!

Is this still happening? I had something similar happen today. I had dropped tanks after selecting the Paveways, and I had to reselect Paveways again after the tanks dropped, otherwise Jester wouldn't get it right.

What is this "manual" thing you speak of? Is that French for something?

do anything right now? No, there is not. Zero chance until there's some major changes, which I wouldn't hold our breath on happening any time soon.

If you start with "Shell select" without tuning first, what happens? What happens if you just start with "approaching for refuel"?

I wouldn't be opposed to it, but without feeling what it would add, it's hard to say if it would be an improvement or not. I get a lot of feedback from the F-14 as is, and I like that, so more is better?

For about a year now. He's put in a lot of work, and made some reasonable guesses and done a lot of math, but that doesn't change the fact that he cannot see what the DCS code does to the missile after it's handed off from the LUA code.

I can see how you could think that, but don't forget, you're the ones trying to come up with the answers, when you have no idea what numbers you're missing in the source code you do not have access to. You can make all the assumptions, guesses, and even calculations you want, but at the end of the day, without the chunk of code you don't have access to, you're just guessing, and that's just... well, let's just say, it's extremely unlikely to be useful at all, making this a pointless exercise in totality that continues to go round and round without end. Until someone has access to ALL the code, it's pointless, and you CANNOT get the technical answers you're looking for, so that claim just doesn't fly (much like the Phoenix, haha).

Check Discord we very much know it's real, but I'm not going to get into it here for obvs reasons.

-1000 I don't work for free, and neither should they.

Ah, yes, ok, there are some circumstances where you can do something outside of it's design, or where you can force that situation I guess. And I can see ppl whining about that, but, ya, that's just dumb.

I haven't seen that one, is that really something ppl claim? (and seriously, if it is, how ridiculous)

What throttle are you using? I don't think that's normal.

tnx

It's in both the instant action missions, as well as the Single Missions for the 14. I think the full name is "Watching the Devildog" or something similar. In the Persian Gulf I believe (I'm not there to check).