Aviator78

With launch authorization override I usually hit the EWR.

Engines off, must be at 0 RPM.

DCS really needs some sort of built-in mission planner for MP for ad-hoc mission planning and transfer to map, kneeboard, navigation systems (with the option to send the flight plan to other flight/package members in MP.

Everything ok as far as I can tell, no issues here.

No, I was just interested in flying some basic aerobatics and a few traffic patterns. Another guy without any flying experience very quickly put the F-4 into a flat spin though and crashed.

You are right, I was thinking of MiG-21 and MiG-29 primarily, those are/were really bad in terms of pitch oscillations, haven't flown the 29 lately though, there might have been FM improvements in recent updates. The MiG-15 feels a little better in this area, it has other quirks though. I'm not saying the MiG-19 FM is perfect, but I like the 'stiffness' of the control input vs. reaction precision. It feels a lot more like an 8 tons fast jet that pretty much goes where you point it. My impressions stem from F-4F and Tornado full-flight sim time and the usual single engine piston aircraft.

I'd approach the issue from the other end: Why do the other fighters show these insanely excessive pitch oscillations? I know this comment will draw a lot of fire from the fans, but here goes nothing: Many DCS fighters show unrealistically excessive pitch oscillations. Old-school fighters were designed to be dynamically stable, and at a certain speed they just fly like on rails, not considering meteo effects. Pitch oscillations like in DCS would create massive amounts of drag in real life flight. From what I can tell from my flying background, the DCS MiG-19 is actually more realistic in that aspect than other modules.

For Soviet/Russian airbases this is correct, these are classic NDBs, not markers.

Back to the 80s... UH-1D of HTG 64 (GAF) on SAR service

20th TFS "Silver Lobos", George AFB, 1970s - early 1990s

I have only recently looked into the M2000 and had a good first impression, but the external sound experience was really bad. That part really needs to be addressed soon.

17 months later... come on ED.

Where do these two files have to go?

IMHO the bread-and-butter modules have top priority over anything else, so: Full fidelity UH-60A/L/M first and foremost.

I was one of the gamemasters and still am a Blue commander / Tactical Commander, but inactive atm, so not really staff and by no means developer. OP is the owner and developer, great guy and genius mind/programmer. He made this server really stand out from the crowd.

It is extremely alive. Great server all in all, but way too many players for my taste in the last few months. I felt it often got too chaotic. There was more of a tactical approach when the community over there was smaller.