Jump to content

BJ55

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    310

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by BJ55

  1. BJ55
    Never had such issue, I can stop the download and resume it from the last byte everytime I need to. It's not possible to rewrite a multiple GB file (.surface5) while it's in use whithout exhausting system resources. Launch the download at night and don't play other games while doing software updates of any kind, CPU/RAM/MB have I/O limits, this user behaviour could lead to data corruption. Agree. Partially agree, they should make hyper-HQ AI units textures (skins) as an optional download, but cockpits textures need high resolution in order to see the labels clearly.
  2. BJ55
    It does! Thank you.
  3. BJ55
    With 2.6.3b, using the mission_settings_load_from = "savedgamesfolder", the airboss_enable = false is not applied, this often leads to a dcs crash (dcs LOG Through The Inferno (Georgian Coast) v2.6.3b.txt) , the only way to disable airboss script is set it to false in both TTI SP Mission Settings folder and ME settings. 263b_airboss.zip
  4. BJ55
    I've encountered the same issue, the only way to undesignate the last AGM-65 target and use the active WP is select the Mav in SMS page, go to WPN page and short press TMS down, even when all Mavs are fired/jettisoned. (edit: there's a chance I've missed the "TMS down" step during the boresight procedure.)
  5. BJ55
    The overall performance at Bagram has really improved, thanks ED!
  6. BJ55
    It Depends on wich old version you're talking about, because after new terrain streaming, fog, volumetric lights and other things DCS has become more demanding. The last patch caused a performance regression, more noticeable in ME loading/saving times, and also more antifreeze warnings, from 2-3 to 8-12 on the same mission, but maybe it's only a scripting issue, because with simple missions there are no warnings. Edit: the core pegged at 100% is a long standing issue. Try with a 32/64GB pagefile and disable some eye-candy to see if the number of warnings decrease.
  7. BJ55
    The bloated W11 on a I9-9900K with 32GB RAM, 16GB pagefile, 8GBVRAM: if you set resolution at 3840x1080, civ traffic, MSAA 4x, SSAO, SSLR, volumetric lights, flat shadows blur, etc., some "antifreeze" is expected.
  8. BJ55
    QNH or QFE? There's a pressure units conversion aproximation error and a QFE calculation error in DCS, but the MB339 altimeter precision is within specifications. But there's a bug: the altimeter get stuck with negative values past -250.
  9. BJ55
    Yep, auto start+accelerated alignment=asking for problems, manual start+normal alignment=no issues. (page 333 of the EN manual)
  10. BJ55
    I was able to reproduce the "issue", on the overhead panel if the warning СЧИСЛЕНИЕ ГРУБОЕ / AC-POS. CAL. DATA is lit the auto hover can't work, solution: wait until the warning light goes off, after completing the startup procedure it can take 5 more minutes on the ground. (it could also be a bug https://forum.dcs.world/topic/372912-airfield-button-and-ac-pos-cal-data-indicator/#comment-5639656 , have yet to check a long mission) (Probably was the June 19 patch: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/changelog/release/2.9.17.11733/ ABRIS. SNS accuracy low - improved) ka50_cau_test.trk
  11. BJ55
    Unfortunately... VRAM is not!
  12. BJ55
    Use a map with a big magvar, launch from distance (>40nm) and observe the difference from commanded magnetic bearing and missile flight path magnetic bearing, the difference is explained in my previous comment, this leads to the target being outside of missile radar search cone. CAU-F18_harpoon.miz CAU-F18_harpoon.trk
  13. BJ55
    F1: you must dim the HUD with the three rheostats below to notice the issue, Aerges dev's already found a fix. JF: yup, fonts are a bit bolder if compared to older screenshots, tested in both 1920 and 2560 resolutions, but I don't know if screenshots where made with a mod.
  14. BJ55
    Thank you!
  15. BJ55
    More images of the F1 here: https://forum.dcs.world/topic/376870-291812722-hud-is-unreadable/#comment-5675251 , it's a night/dimming issue. Add the JF-17 to the bold list. options.lua
  16. BJ55
    It's the same result, only with bigger fonts: Tested also without auto fog.
  17. BJ55
    Weird, daytime the HUD is OK:
  18. BJ55
    As per title, the Hud has become unreadable: Using the rheostat to decrease brightness make things even worse: Suggestions? Best regards. dcs.log
  19. BJ55
    +1 Mirage F1 Hud is unreadable. (2560x1440)
  20. BJ55
    Any news on this bug?
  21. BJ55
    I block everything from Google, so no chance to see the (ad infested) youtube, hope someone else take a look at it. Sorry.
  22. BJ55
    Uh, DCS tracks are still bugged?! Try without Stream Deck and search in the dcs.log for errors.
  23. BJ55
    Not an issue, right click on the HUD power switch. Not happening here, just tested Caucasus C&D quick start mission, also flew some sorties at TTI Sinai. Do you use mods?
  24. BJ55
    first and second track: no A/G master mode selected, no weapon selected through stores page, so no fuze settings applied.
  25. BJ55
    I've tested all dumb bomb release modes with the attached mission and found no issues, put in active pause and configure the AC for the bomb run, tgt's are at 20nm. Try with removing the A-4E and performing a full DCS repair, if it still doesn't work post a track and a DCS log. AV-6B_ag_train_cauc_82LD.miz
×
×
  • Create New...