Jump to content

TucksonSonny

Members
  • Posts

    1102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TucksonSonny

  1. I can’t do the update on www.lockonfiles.com I choose modify and confirm with the “request” button but nothing happen? Somebody has any idea?
  2. The attack was done by 2x2frogfoot-ships and the story is about a hero Tuckson Sonny :D (number 16 in the movie) I have added a new version for the quality freaks (same size 97MB) DivX compression ratio 6 (the old version was 10) Bitrate is a little higher: 2308 kb/s (quality increased within 100MB) Audio: MP3-codec: MPEG-2 Layer 3 You will ask me now: How is it possible that it has the same size? Answer: I made an error (audio was a row copy about 40MB+ wav Sorry for that :D) Anyway older version (1525 kb/s) is better for (very) old PC’s ;)
  3. Get the hffms manual (130 pages) and you will get answers for all your MIL/AB thrust questions and more ;) Of course it is for the viper but for all your thrust questions about MIL thrust /AB power it is very simple: just multiply the numbers with 2 for the F-15.
  4. Multiple F-16’s with jammers on ... But running out of fuel in the Mig-29 and being chased by couple of eagles is also not funny!
  5. What engine are we talking about again? 220? :D Anyway little list history: General Electric: F110 – GE – 100 F110 – GE – 129 F110-GE-132: The Block 60 F-16E/F, which is being developed for the United Arab Emirates, features extra payload and range, in part due to the new F110-132 engine being developed by General Electric, which produces 145kN of thrust. Pratt & Whitney: For the F100-PW-200 version, normal dry thrust is 12,420 pounds, rising to a maximum thrust of 14,670 pounds at full military power. Maximum afterburning thrust is 23,830 pounds. F100-PW-229: Pratt & Whitney introduced the more powerful (F100-PW-229 early 1990s) (rated at 29,100 pounds of thrust with full afterburner) The F100-PW-200+ (was intended for foreign air forces which were denied access to the more powerful -229) F100-PW-220E: A kit has been developed to bring earlier -200 engines up to a standard nearly equivalent to -220, these converted engines being designated F100-PW-220E. F100- PW-220 (used in F16 – MLU) Performance of the F100 (used in the Belgium F-16A/B) is today comparable with the F110-132 engine being developed by General Electric, which produces 145kN of thrust or 32000 pounds of thrust PS. 145Kn (kilo newtons) is about 32597.29 pounds-force From its original 24,000-pound thrust class rating the F100 has matured into an engine that can produce in excess of 32,000 pounds of thrust (+33% thrust increasing) and remains a standard for fighter engine performance.
  6. In the past I made this graph by extracting data from the F-16 hffms. It shows the relation between altitude and maximum thrust at full AB produced: I think this is the answer for your thrust behavior problem. The conclusion: At high altitude your jet engine produces less thrust but needs less thrust to perform! A question for ED: What about the LEF modeling (the Leading Edge Flap) (The LEF effect was included with the data to calculate the lift in hffms)
  7. You dropped 4slammers and 4sidewinders?
  8. I guess the formula proves not to be accurate or this graph is not accurate:
  9. I was looking around on Youtube and this one got my attention! Very cool work done by Lothamroth288 (a French guy I think, kind of 007 style) Part 1: Part 2: Now I wonder what the name of the music is. (I remember the music from the famous Su-37 terminator video)
  10. It is easy It is free It is unlimited It is the fastest available It is the largest available It is German :D … Please inform me why you don’t like RS?
  11. That movie was just insane. Man, you have way too much free time. No serious, I like your style, that movie rocks! :thumbup: edit:typo mistakes...
  12. I wonder if the real F-15 pilot ever flew over Mach 2.5 (it is possible that even with 3000 hours they never could do it because of limiters or downgraded engines) Not sure about the loadout/drag issue anyway..
  13. I wish I could write correct English paragraphs like a 13 year old English native :D
  14. Please note that me and of course Yo-Yo and others are still waiting for proof (chart, formula, or whatever) showing that it isn’t modeled accurate.
  15. Me too I can't recall you saying anything too bad. But now I am curious too. Have you a clue of what you would have said wrong or a hint (of the PM spammer)? You don’t have to give names of course. Maybe I have to read more posts!
  16. Indeed it is 1.12a for Vista! You missed nothing! ;)
  17. Sometimes it is about these little details: new typhoon suits permit longer 9G turns for the pilots ;) (What if your pilot blacks out in his super plane?)
  18. But indeed sustained AoA 60° for the raptor…;)
  19. In the case of ef2k that is positive! It can flip 180° like a coin (using canard-wings). Even faster than a raptor can do this! (I have this from a RAF source)
  20. Here you go: March 2007 - Instrumented Production Aircraft Four (IPA4), fitted with the Meteor Beyond Visual Range air-to-air missile, preparing for flight at Morуn Air Base, Spain. This flight also saw the test fleet achieve the 5,000th flight hour.:D
  21. Wooaw, the last one! Even in lockon I don’t go that low :pilotfly: …
  22. Cool! Next time let the poor convoy shoot back a couple of bullets at you! ;) First you start with some gunning at the convoy and at the end you decide to drop the bombs anyway (why keeping them anyway :D ) Tip: You can get rid of the lag if you use render software (like the build in soft) and by not using real time capture software like fraps.
  23. Someone voted Ching Kuo! WTF is a Ching Kuo? :D
  24. Anyway until now you don’t get a picture of a ef2k being in an embarrassed situation like that :D My vote was for the Eurofighter Typhoon of course… BTW: there was a sequence of pictures showing that the superbug owned the raptor completely (180° flipping)
×
×
  • Create New...