TucksonSonny

Great work on that Su-27 model! (Especially the canopy correction) Hope? It must make it to the BS release or I don’t buy it :D

Hehe, this old thread is bumped up again… Anyway I think that it is the supercruise compromise. The supercruise jet-engine is optimized for NOT using the afterburners (the same goes for the typhoons) Classical jet-engine are optimized for using the afterburners (multiple stages of AB) Mach 2+ requires full AB and burns your fuel like crazy. My further speculation on this new engines is also the kind of material used for the jet-engine (engines in carbon materials don’t like AB too much)

The RWR? Or what else? Overriding the ET is a bug? :D

After a bad day at the office she will cheer you up. My favorite comedian youtube poster and she is also a very cute/hot and smart woman: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY75srb_KFU&mode=related&search= :D

You don’t need to change the “meinit.xml”. Example: New loadaout for the Mig29S – Russia. Edit your “mecustom.xml” and copy/past these lines in your file: <Payload CLSID="{7AE63F67-AD03-450B-BFCA-F17B183BB18C}" Name="testR77"> <Item PylonNo="1" LauncherCLSID="{B4C01D60-A8A3-4237-BD72-CA7655BC0FE9}"/> <Item PylonNo="2" LauncherCLSID="{B4C01D60-A8A3-4237-BD72-CA7655BC0FE9}"/> <Item PylonNo="3" LauncherCLSID="{C0FF4842-FBAC-11d5-9190-00A0249B6F00}"/> <Item PylonNo="4" LauncherCLSID="{2BEC576B-CDF5-4B7F-961F-B0FA4312B841}"/> <Item PylonNo="5" LauncherCLSID="{C0FF4842-FBAC-11d5-9190-00A0249B6F00}"/> <Item PylonNo="6" LauncherCLSID="{B4C01D60-A8A3-4237-BD72-CA7655BC0FE9}"/> <Item PylonNo="7" LauncherCLSID="{B4C01D60-A8A3-4237-BD72-CA7655BC0FE9}"/> </Payload> When you select later “testR77” loadout it is done! You only need to change the code for the missile/loadout: 1500L {2BEC576B-CDF5-4B7F-961F-B0FA4312B841} 800L {A5BAEAB7-6FAF-4236-AF72-0FD900F493F9} R-73 {FBC29BFE-3D24-4C64-B81D-941239D12249} R-77 {B4C01D60-A8A3-4237-BD72-CA7655BC0FE9} ET {B79C379A-9E87-4E50-A1EE-7F7E29C2E87A} T {88DAC840-9F75-4531-8689-B46E64E42E53} BTW, you can first create a normal loadout with lomac in your loadout screen and exit lockon and edit your file. Don’t forget to add the Payload CLSID: it is important! ;) A strange bug: Sometimes you need to select/load one or more default loadouts before you can select your custom testLoad with success! Even better: Save the mission and you have the custom loadout embedded in the mission file.

If I have the chance then I am going to check that out on a xbox 360 someday! Awesome looking…:thumbup:

Na, You will get just a little spam of a couple of Nazi-games that is all! :D

Linking multiple jammers that is even more interesting! That means that multiple jammers have indeed an advantage. Thus with a 4 ship versus 1 ship you will burn the other ECM out of the air! I do like that! How about flankers loaded all over with Sorbstiya ECM pods? ;)

Many thanks guys, Very good job! :D The funny thing is that I could give myself also 1 vote :D But I have to admit that the Smull-film is one piece of quality work! Anyway my movie comes with a 720p HD version: http://rapidshare.com/files/22469169/FalaiseMovie.avi.html Greetings, TS.

I like it even more if somebody mentions the "F22" pawn all word :D

I guess we will need a quad core for this stuff because 2,500,000 sheep will give a hell of lag problems! :D Between GB and Germany…. I almost tricked in it for the first 20 seconds: thinking of a flightsim about Belgium airspace!! :blush:

Another reason for winning some cash! The lag I have lately is not funny anymore :D

Disable ECM blinking of course (setting 2sec min interval)

Me, TucksonSonny am in the running for a little movie contest (started today on 31-MAR-2007) for some price-money ($250 1st price and $100 2nd price) I have already replaced my 1st version and I registered just in time with my new contest movie (FalaiseMovie.avi) If you like my movie (or not :D ) you can anyway vote for me (just need to register and make the vote) it is about WWII game... I could use the money for buying a track ir thus you people can help me maybe with this! Or not! You can of course vote for another contestant too no problem… Anyway to stay on lockon topic: I am planning to start in the future a little contest for lockon myself! ;) You can vote here: http://www.digitalmindsoft.eu/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=81&t=104&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a Greetings, TS.

AMD Barcelona Quad-core processors & 8-core desktop systems are here in 2007… SSE128 improves performance: -Matrix multiply performance improves by 85% -Other math intensive apps show 10%-50% gains (flight sims?) Read it here: http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38322

You can also win some nice prizes if you can win the “Strategic Objectives” New scenarios for AOEIII from MosheLeve (Officially sponsored by Microsoft Studios) Recently they released patch 1.10. http://aoe3.heavengames.com/cgi-bin/forums/display.cgi?action=st&fn=12&tn=32929&f=12,0,0,30&st=0 Contest will be closed I think on April 6th 2007: The 8 games that he gives away (primary list) are: 2 AOE3: TWC, 2 Company of Heroes 2 Supreme Commander 2 Rise of Legends The prizes that Ensemble is donating are: • 3 Copies of Flight Sim X • 3 Copies of Dungeon Siege 2 • 3 Copies of The WarChiefs • 10 Age of Empires III watches with leather bands • 3 Age of Empires III hats I also do remember a FC campaign contest from the past with prize money or was I dreaming that :-)

Anyway now you can join Nato and EU ;)

The F-117 is stealthier than the F-35, dude :D There is also the version of the Serbs having an S-300 unit during the Yugo war. I remember that the US was accusing Russia of delivering one during the Yugo war period.

On the ground 5MW is really no problem at all! ;) Here you have a 5MW wind turbine: BTW, The US has 100 GW in nuclear power plants, which provide 1/5 of their electricity! (100,000 MW :D) Other examples: 3 MW - Tech: Mechanical power output of a diesel locomotive 190 MW - Tech: peak power output of a Nimitz class aircraft carrier 900 MW - Tech: electric power output of a CANDU nuclear reactor

Yes but you are also working with the perfect RCS of 0.0001 m2 for the F-22 flying in a perfect point of view. Note also if you try to jam a 1.23 MW antenna or even putting your radar on is asking for a lot of trouble :D .

:D I also calculated the detection range of the JSF with the S-300 would be 27nm or 54nm between 2 sams. (RCS JSF 0.001 m2) Anyway all the others including EF-2k are meat for the S-300…

F-117 is stealthier than the JSF? WTF :D Do we have to phase out the JSF already? :D

All you have to do to stop the F-22 is setup a SA-10/MU-300 SAM Site each 30nm in line! With 100 SAM Sites you cover about 3000nm… (SA-10/MU-300 SAM Site 1.23 MW) With 1MW (1,000,000 Watts) you can detect the F-22 @15nm. I wonder how much megawatt is a S-400 SA-20 Triumf? :D

It is obvious that the stealth capability of the f-117 is already outstripped and the plane is becoming useless. I heard that the F-117 had even better stealth capability than the f-22 in spite of the better computer modeling of the new frame. (Focus for the raptor was 50% on air superiority fighter and only 50% on stealth capability) I wonder how much $£€ for one f-117 now :D

Banned? :D