Jump to content

Silver_Dragon

Members
  • Posts

    12888
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    110

Everything posted by Silver_Dragon

  1. I remember Touchka was on develop by ED some time ago, but never was release. Enviado desde mi CPH2197 mediante Tapatalk
  2. I don't think so. If that were the case, you'd be putting HB in a difficult position, as they'd not only have to revise three modules (including the South Atlantic map unless the ORBX team transfers it to them), but would also throw their entire planning for current and future modules into disarray. Another problem is understanding how these modules are coded, and it wouldn't be unusual to have to tear down many parts of the code to rewrite them from scratch and recreate all the 3D models. Another problem you could face is if one of the former RAZBAM team members could ask you for copyright, both for the code and for the 3D objects. In other words, a nightmare. I could almost say that a new third party would be better off taking over their work, even if they had to start from scratch.
  3. Why? Because some don't get the answers they want, or because court proceedings aren't a forum for open discussion? Are we just looking for a "headline"?... Life isn't black and white, it's a set of gray areas, and honestly, no one here wants to be in court with a lawyer who will use any ruling from the opposing party to embezzle them. The situation is already so tense that they want to add fuel to the fire...
  4. A British harrier will be a problem, by RAZBAM, talking on the past, was a "license problem" by the military stament with some data restricted.
  5. Not sure, but by the 2025 and beyond and the Germany Cold War videos, that can be a problem on the TDK editor, or no implemented.
  6. Waiting Octopus-G or other confirm them.
  7. UM Germany video, Easter Eggs... 0:03 T-62M? 1:00 New radars?
  8. By UM, the Germany assets pack will coming on the Phase 3. P
  9. ED has no plans to build a clasic or EW version. about a EW, missing that funtionality on the core.
  10. I put very clear on the second point: Can Ugra use the caucasus RSBN/PRMG funtionality and implement on your map or need ED move some about them first?
  11. That has no a problem by Ugla. has plans to give a RSBN/PRMG unit funtional? The RSBN/PRMG funtionality on Caucasus map will be used on other maps? That will be a ED side problem.
  12. The TF-51D never was armed. The only option has ED make a "free" WW2 combat aircraft (no plans yet).
  13. No.... someone need remember the L-39.... ED and a 3rd party make them on paralel.... and some need remembre when RAZBAM coming to DCS with the T-2/F-15E, etc plans, other 3rd party called IRIS claimed a F-15E, F-14 and others modules at same time (IRIS drop from DCS and your 3rd party was disolved a year or two after).
  14. @Tank50us.... are you serious?. We have a P-51D mustang FF module from 2012, build by ED... and no, that has not the TF-51D free. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/dcs_p51d_mustang/ About the Su-25 contrapart, has the A-10C.... yes, has no a "Cold War" version (we need a A-10A), but actualy ED has no plans, but by the actual "road", put many FC-3 modules on FF, surely on a future, will coming a A-10A version FF.
  15. We have a Mustang... from some years ago by ED, and the Su-25T has very improbable by the actual situation (a post cold war), a version A has more feasible.
  16. A-6E, F-15C, etc...
  17. Assets has not build by a Map team, need build by Asset teams, and actualy, Ugra-Media has none confirm you own "Assets team / Assets pack". Diferent tools and diferent building methods (TDK vs SDK). On fact, none previous map from ED or 3rd parties has your "atrezzo" export to Assets. Update: UM has confirmed a assets pack and a assets team.
  18. Remember that has profesional products, nothing to do with DCS World.
×
×
  • Create New...