Silver_Dragon

The PG has featured complete, and ED has no plans to expand them.

Those rumors about Dassault have been circulating since the time of the Mirage 2000C, over 10 years ago, and there has never been an official module with their name on it, nor any third-party French developer or similar project endorsed by them. So, until ED confirms it, they remain just rumors...

The problem about the Trams, will be Paris phased out your lines before WW2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tramways_in_Île-de-France London maintain them but many was phased out before WW2. After WW2 was complete abandoned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trams_in_London

Remember: First: DCS World has no "Balance". Many of that projects has 3rd Party projects, no ED. 3rd party select projects by your criteria (normaly by countries). The Mig-29A by ED, has build with info the a old Warsac Pact country, no Russia. ED has faced a sales ban from certain companies in Russia (helicopter manufacturers), resulting in the removal of several modules related to red helicopters. As Wags claim on previous Q&A, the problem has the available info, SME, resources, time and licenses to make a FF Redforce aircraft, remember the problems by Deka to make a chinesse FF aircrafts. ED has none plans to a 2010/20 Redforce aircraft. About ED projects: Su-25A FF has no claimed by ED yet, as a Su-27 FF, A-10A FF and other Mig-29 FC versions. Await ED share news about them. Actual future ED projects F6F Hellcat (Blue) F-15C (Blue) F-35A (Blue) Future Helo (Blue and/or Red) A6M5 Zero (Red) About 3rd Party projects: Aerges Mirage F-1M (Blue) F-104G/TF-104G (Blue) Airplane Simulation Company C-130J (Blue) Aviron KFIR (Blue/Red). Crosstail Studios A-1H (Blue) Deka Ironwork J-8B PP (Red) FlyingIrons Simulations: A-7E (Blue) HeatBlur Simulations: Eurofighter Trench 1 (Blue) A-6E (Blue) F-14A (Early) (Blue/Red) F-14B(U) (Blue) IndiaFoxtEcho: G.91R Gina (Blue) Magnitude 3 LLC: F-8J (Blue) Mig-21bis 2.0 (Red) MilTech 5 / PD: Bo-105 (Blue) Octopus-G La-7 (Red) Po-2 (Red) Su-17 (Red) Polychop Future Helo (Blue?) Red Star Studios: Mig-17F (Red) The Rafale has only a rumor, none 3rd party has claimed them yet.

This isn't about "balance," it's about reality. If you can't build something because there's no documentation (since much of that information is classified), then good luck trying to invent its functionality on your own (it's like trying to add both elctronic offensive and defensive capabilities to a ship)...

Ugra Media Normandy 2.0

The actual DCS Maps cover. A 3rd party will build a propper GUIK Map zone to cover England / Ireland / etc. GUIK has a propper combat zone. ED has working on the "World Map". (15:25).

Normandy 2.0 covert the south england to London an the Channel cover only London to Dover on WW2 (only UK terrain, has other europe zones covered). Actuly has no a propper UK modern map on DCS by ED or 3rd parties. A map of that scale is too small to be commercially viable. A much larger map would be more advisable.

Grinelli Designs F-100D develop update

It's as simple as this: the system isn't designed for it; they are independent maps. You can't load two maps simultaneously. And speaking of the Middle East, there are three companies creating flat maps (ED, Ugra Media, and OnReTech), and even though there's some overlapping territory, none of them share maps or assets. (For example, the maps of Syria and Iraq have different levels of detail for the airbases along the Syrian-Iraqi border.) Each company creates its own assets, even though they use the same SDK for development (the TDK). That's what the "spherical earth" and the "2.0" version of the TDK are intended to address: not only creating circular maps, but also allowing players to fly seamlessly from one map to another, all within a spherical environment that dynamically loads the necessary terrain (like some commercial flight simulators). ED has working on that technology years, and Wags talked about them on the January 2025 Q&A. (from 10:53 to ahead some map topics, include the World Map and Map expansions).

Dinamic Campaign Updates: December 2023 https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/newsletters/5bf6ef59f8b97771ba0e0ac9904be8f7/ July 2024 Update Wags February 2025 Q&A Dinamic Campaign Wags August 2025 Dynamic Campaign update (3:45) Meanwhile, Wags talked about New AI ATC and Player ATC on the January 2025 ATC (21:20)

Actualy ED has no enable the trailers with towing capability. And missing many trailers.

from Heatblur Discord:

What zone are your flying?, remember, Afghanistan north zone has no release yet.

Remember ED has making a F-15C FF

The actual flat maps has none that capability and require rebuild with the future "Whole Earth Technology". The main problem, many maps has overlapped and has many 3rd parties will not share your sources.

Wags claimed a UH-60L will coming after the new helo..... on a last Q&A. A SH-3 (and other ASW helo) has a problem, we dont have none Sonar and water engine, and by now ED has no claim about build a naval weapons.

By Heatblur on your Discord

Remember, on 2025 and beyond, was a "teaser" of the Dynamic Campaign

Rusian dont build new versions about Kutnesov Su-25 UBK carrier capable, that has only carry fuel tanks and gun removed. On fact, the only "weapon capable" carrier trainer was de Mig-29KUBR from 2016

On Develo by ED, but not dates to release yet.

That's the serious problem that people don't understand: when aircraft landed on an aircraft carrier, they were moved by the ground crew. The pilot shut down the aircraft as soon as they landed and left the area of the landing cables. They weren't even "parked"; they were simply stored forward on the deck until the landing cycle ended or move down to the hangars and the deck crew redistributed them (this is seen in certain "strategic game" involving World War II aircraft carriers). Takeoffs and landings were planned (which took a long time), and the aircraft were deployed from bow to stern and to the hangar, or vice versa. The pilots never intervened, and when they took off, it was simply from their takeoff positions, with a very short taxi to align, nothing more (nothing like the SuperCarrier). Furthermore, the use of catapults was normally "very rare," and less so in large attacks.

That require ED implement them first.