splash

I preordered in november so i only have one campaign for free. In the newsletter said something as "for those that prepurchased the nevada map and "elected" to receive this map for free (?), you will now be able to activate this campaign from the dcs world 2.0 module manager" I was no given the chance to elect nothing when i bought Nevada. It is kind of confuse.

A Mig-23/27 or Su-22 would be my choose, even a Su-25 or Su-25T.

Thanks for your answers. I was evaluating your proposals and I'll probably uninstall 1.2.16, download 1.5.2 installer and install a brand new 1.5.2 (for sure that will copy files from other versions). So, my current 1.5.2 will go on as a beta.

Hi, I currrently have three versions: 1.2.16, 1.5.2 as openbeta and 2.0. Could you please tell me what is better: a) update 1.2.16 to 1.5.2 release. b) remove/uninstall 1.2.16 and convert 1.5.2 openbeta to release. Thanks.

Gunsight (taken from Su-25), invented RSBN, PRMG and NDB stations, radar, outer/middle beacons, overpowered missiles (R-3), etc.

IMHO, MiG-21 is not one the most realistic modules in DCS. There are many shortcomings that aren't second nature. Thanks to the work of people like Tarres, in our squad we are flying the MiG-21 as realistic as possible (radial interceptions, realistic ordnance, etc.), but there are some limitations that we cannot overcome.

In my opinion Tonopah is a real need. This morning I was re-reading first chapter of Vipers in the Storm, in which it is described a green flag exercise in NTTR (a ground attack against a SA-8 site with Air to Air opposition). Enemy forces use Tonopah airport and friendly forces use Nellis AFB . The main problem in NTTR is the short distances in between airports currently developed.

Enhorabuena por el manual del C-101. Además del estupendo y detallado contenido, tiene una maquetación excelente, de los mejorcitos que he visto.

Ok thanks, i ll try to install it in 2.0. I m not using 1.2 anymore.

Many thanks and merry Christmas! Nice reading for my holidays.

Do you have problems with activation? Last time I switched versions I lost 4 activations and I don't to repeat the same error.

I'd like to see a Su-25 or Su-25T with PFM.

Thanks for your offer! I'd like to play L-39 a lot.

Excellent news, thanks for the update. That will be a very nice reading for Christmas.

Same here. Yesterday I was flying over St. George and there we have an airport!

F86f, Many thanks!

Excellent job, this is what i was looking for. I tried it several times with no luck.

I'd like to see classic fighters as Su-24, MiG-23/27, MiG-25, F-4, F-16, etc.

Ok, I'll go on playing under 1.5.1.

Will I have problems with activation in 2.0? I'm only playing MiG-21 under 1.5.1.

I don't have any entry under HKEY_CURRENT_USER. Neither before this update nor now. It is currently under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and working ok in 1.5.1 (I didn't try in 1.2.16 and won't try it).

Do you know if it is a good idea to install this driver in a HD 5870?

I deleted MiG-21 from 1.2.16 since the last patch and I have no intention at all to install it again. In 1.5.1 it is running ok by following the steps. I understand the need of some people to run it in 1.2.16. In my Ka-50 squadon, 1.2.16 is the standard and I have to fly with it.

I followed all steps and it is working, but the registry entry has been created in: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Leatherneck Simulations\DCS:MiG-21 BiS\Keys\License0 and not in HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Eagle Dynamics as stated in the changelog.

My question is if we need to deactivate (running pcnsl.exe), as in the next step we delete all windows registry entries.