Aginor

Yeah. Other than that it is just "feeling" the right rudder input. For me it is easier since I adjusted my curves to 30.

Agree with Flagrum, those look a bit rough still.

Or just use a clock. After three minutes you are good to go. :)

Some people have reported that setting the curves to 15 or so might work well.

- Please implement missing button functionality if you can, such as the hydraulics test button.

Oh, by the way: What's the black and yellow lever next to the rotor brake for? It isn't implemented so I guess it isn't something important, I'd just like to know. :)

- Please add some point to click the door to open/close it. - Please update tutorials to contain all systems (such as turning countermeasures system, lights, and radios on.)

- The lower fin below the fenestron has no damage model, it ignores the ground and moves through - no clickable spot for the doors (I am fine with rcntrl+C but I wonder where does a real Gazelle pilot grab the door? Maybe you could just add a clickable spot there - button "D" for cyclying pylons is mentioned in the tutorial, but not assigned

Works for me as well. For me the only things to criticise about the cold start lessons are: - no clicking the test buttons (voltage test, caution lights panel test) - not switching external lights on - not switching NADIR on - not switching radios on - not switching countermeasures system on

Yeah, thats correct. A delta wing has awesome turn rates when flying fast, but it bleeds energy more quickly. The solution is having a huge engine, like in the Eurofighter. In the M2000C you have to watch your speed and AoA carefully. It is a good nimble fighter, but the F-15 has far more powerful engines.

The lower fin moves into the ground and out of it again, without being damaged. There should at least be some resistance. Or maybe it should bend or break. It is just a minor bug, I still wanted to mention it. :)

I am not sure how much it should be, but I don't feel it either. Perhaps that is correct though, I am by no means an expert.

thank god! :D

Hey guys! I think you should create a bug report subforum so we can post issues we find. :) I found one so far. When hitting the ground with the tail it partly sinks into the ground before something bad actually happens. Steps to reproduce: - Land - cyclic full aft - raise collective until nose rises and tail strikes the ground.

I just took her for a spin. Literally. WTF this thing is unstable! Will take some time to learn to fly it. I have a FF stick though, and with no forces it is pretty hard. I hope they implement basic FF (at least center force or something) soon. For now I set all curves to 30. Still very twitchy but flyable. :)

Thanks for the hotfix, really appreciated!

Oh, that's really unfortunate. Let's see how it affects his play. Interesting story on how important and personal the cue is (I hope I remember it correctly): After losing the cue he had been playing with for his whole career (it was severely damaged while transported by plane) it took Stephen Hendry several weeks to recover. He then decided to always train with more than one cue in case it would be damaged again. Some players (don't know about Fu) also do that with tips. They keep a few tips ready in case something like that happens. The advantage is that they can continue play (almost) unaffected.

As promised first day buy. Congratulations to your first release! :)

That's right! Alan McManus was a name I knew when I started watching snooker in the 90s, and he was always "near the top but not quite there". Seeing him now, beating his friend John Higgins (who has aged considerably, he actually looks older than McManus now although he isn't) was a bit surreal. Talking about old: Marco Fu isn't exactly young either, he's just two years younger than Higgins. :D Strange to see him in the semifinals. I know he is a top 16 player, but somehow his name doesn't say "finalist" to me. Don't know. The Crucible Theater has its own rules though. Shaun Murphy wasn't even in the top16 when he won his first championship. :)

I am not sure if he can keep his potting rate up. But he is a very experienced player with a lot of tactical skill. If he can use that, he will have an advantage, although Ding is the more precise player. The direct comparison (Ding won 3 out of 4 matches): http://cuetracker.net/Head-to-Head/Ding-Junhui/Alan-McManus But that doesn't have to mean much, since McManus seems to get better and better last year and this year.

At the moment it looks like Ding is an even harder opponent for McManus than I thought. At this rate it will be more like 17:8 in the end.

Yeah. Also: ten simmers, twelve opinions which one MUST OBVIOUSLY be the next plane. :D

Alan McManus, one of the oldest players in the tournament (an the oldest one to reach the last 32 round IIRC), enters the semifinals! Great performance! After 23 years he is in a semifinals again. I think he beat Higgins because Higgins for some reason missed a lot of "easy" pots though. But my guess is that Ding will beat him. With his long pot success of below 50% during his last matches McManus has to play very clever to win against Ding. A position considered "safe" in a game against Higgins is not safe at all when playing against Ding. McManus can still win using his vast tactical experience, but my money is still on Ding. Fu vs. Selby: That one is tough. On a good day Fu is really strong, but he isn't the most mentally strong player out there. When he is behind OR leading more than a few frames he tends to make more mistakes. Selby was called "torturer" once (by Ronnie O'Sullivan) because when not able to pot he tends to play a tactical game that sometimes reminds of Judd Trump's "naughty snooker", very frustrating for his opponent. He can win against Fu by frustrating him, and refraining from playing too aggressive himself. Fu can win by staying calm and bringing his best snooker. I think Selby will win this one. So here are my bets for the semifinals: Mark Selby vs. Marco Fu: 17:14 Ding Junhui vs. Alan McManus: 17:12 Oh, and by the way: Impressive play by Barry Hawkins (even though he lost). What a fighter!

Sounds like he really liked it! I wondered though: Is he right and BST configured those weapons, or are the Huey's weapons the stock DCSW ones?

Concerning Ding Junhui vs. Mark Williams: While I expected Ding to win it was more one-sided than I thought. Mark Williams had very bad luck though, the tip of his cue stick broke off just prior to the match. For a snooker pro that's a pretty severe thing, most need days to get used to a new one. So that might be one of the reasons for the result. As for Fu vs. Hawkins: Not sure. Hawkins may still come back. But it will be a hard task. Selby beat Wilson 13-8, but Wilson played a very good second session there.