Jump to content

upyr1

Members
  • Posts

    4345
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by upyr1

  1. Looking at this I'm wondering if this means anything in regards to the Razbam situation I didn't think you could do a multi-pack either way both would be awesome
  2. I'd like both. They might be too different for a multi-pack but I'd buy both
  3. I don't expect them to say much. I know there is a whole flotilla of rumors going about
  4. The date left me wondering what it was an AI asset for the SA asset pack or a module
  5. upyr1

    A2A Fastpacks

    The Charlie Eagle can carry them
  6. That's why I posted this thread. When the Hornet was first released it was basically the F-18 then they added the A-18 part over the years The CFT might not be modled in the Flaming Cliffs version but the C does carry them
  7. This was dated 2019 and depics WIP shots of the Sea Harrier FRS 1. either these were intended to be AI or Razbam was working on a Sea Harrier module
  8. Hopefuly this discussion will become moot before too long. I don't know how long it will be before 3.0 comes out but hopefully we'll get a settlement before they get depricated
  9. Sure it wasn't the Sea Harrier FRS.51 or Sea Harrier F(A).2 I know in 2019 or so there were screenshots of a WIP Sea Harrier . The FRS1 used the Blue Fox and the F(a).2 used the Blue Vixen which was further developed into the Typhoon's radar The FRS.51 used the Euroradar Captor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euroradar_CAPTOR
  10. I'd love to see voice command added too but the fewer AI GIBs we have the easier it will be
  11. Something that should exist
  12. Wag should mention the option in the AA refueling training videos
  13. I'd like to know which varaint they were looking at? Knowing how things often work, the default is to go for the most advanced variant you can get documents for. The AV-8 we have may be the closest to the RAF bird Ideally if you have the originals you should at least get a deep discount to make up for the mess
  14. If HB really is too busy to take on the F-15E then all I ask is that who ever picks up the ball at least discusses licencing Jester. HB has said that they would do that and I believe it would be nice to have a common RIO/WSO interface.
  15. I'd be fine with different variants. I am thinking the variant we have is from 2003. So a storm bird would be awesome for the Germany map. It would be nice to see some French smart bombs and A2G missiles provided the data is available We really need to see the whole Harrier family. My thoughts. a Faulklands war era Sea Harrier Legacy Harrier- if the biggest differnce between the USMC and RAF variants is paint, then I don't care. With the Harrier II, the plus version is a must, I also think a British Harrier II variant would be nice as well which one I don't care as long as the differnce is more than just liveries Sinc the Mig-19 has been out of service for decades it might not be that big of a problem. The real issue is picking the variant. The biggest question here is how many systems does ED have the code for already? The only request I'd have is, please license Jester. If making the announcement results in RB's legal team popping up. The best outcome would be getting a multi-variant module because Rambam decides selling their code would be an easy out .
  16. HB should have done the F-15E in the first place. Even though the WSO is optional in the MUD Hen it should have had Jester. As for the rest- I really don't have a prefernce as to who supports them. All I know is that if RB isn't willing to return to DCS or sell the rights to their module to another developer then they should start discussions about new modules.
  17. I've got no objections to the F-35B, or giving the F-16 the Lantern pod. I'm also looking forward to the A-6 and would love the F-111
  18. The problem with this is that people want the F-15E, Mirage, MiG-19 and Harrier. Do you know what that will take? Becuse I don't. Now unless that happens we're left with two options lose the aircraft or another developer produces some modules.
  19. I don't know the timelines but given the choice between buying replacements and not having the aircraft in question I would rather buy the ED Harrier
  20. Hopefully we'll see a Razbam/ED reunion. I know a lot of mud was flying but when money is involved emotions can get high but portraits of Mr. Franklin or King Charles' can calm things down. If Razbam isn't coming back the I hope they are willing to sell the modules to Eagle or other developers. My dream would be to see HB take over the Mud Hen so we get jester as the F-15E WSO
  21. @NineLine Would have more information but if nothing changes the module will stop working after 2.9 so this means we'll either need to maintain an old DCS 2.9 along side our hardrives, ED and RB have to come to an agrement, or ED needs to step in and get replacement modules going. I know that ED has given some people refunds for the Strike Eagle it was for in store credits.
  22. Since it looks like the sun is setting on the Razbam modules. I'm wondering it would be out of the question for Ed and possibly some other developer to get started on a replacement for them.
  23. Agreed I'm upset with both sides
  24. If you can't get things settled then all I ask of ED is please make your own Strike Eagle, Harrier, MiG-19, and Mirage 2K
×
×
  • Create New...