upyr1

No harm in asking. The worst ED will say is no. In that case the question is whether or not you would be fine with a Franken plane-mod?

The problem is getting documentation, I don't see that happening unless there are some major political changes. There is zero harm in submitting the equivalent of a FOIA request with Russia and Sukhoi. Without the documentation the best I could expect to see would be a mod. I prefer to deal with older aircraft due to the issue of documention

Dcs 2084 and beyond DCS F-40 Phantom III.

Most mods I have seen just need to be installed in the saved games folder. I hope it does a nice browser would be great

Toss in mods and I think it would be really awesome,

I figured that the reason was simply the lack of material about Russian aircraft.

True, which is why I'll defer to ED's judgment on whether or not there is enough information to make the F-20. I'm not opposed to getting it, but if we get it as an official module I'd love to see a new developer produce it

Si, esto è buona idea. Scusa io non scrivo italiano buono. Io voglio un checklist per knee boards.

Some people like me need help getting good.

Sounds like you created your own launcher. As stated before in another comment I don't know if I would use the launcher or not. I just want the option fir those who want it and the option to not use it for those who don't.

I don't know why you would or wouldn't want a launcher and frankly I don't care. If you don't want to use a launcher for any reason then you should have the option not to do so. My comment was just in response to someone who created their own launcher.

I wouldn't be surprised. It's a shame he didn't do it.

Mods aren't a headache for ED, they are a potential headache for users. As they are not official ED or third-party projects people use them at their own risk. So if an update breaks a mod, oh well that's none of EDs concern it is up to the mod community to fix them. If you had actually paid attention to the ED forum BTW you will see there is a modding section https://forum.dcs.world/forum/69-dcs-modding/ Why not make the launcher with a built-in option to start other programs?

We need a tail gun My issue was when you said the B-66 and A-3 were basically the same plane and later compared their relationship to the F-4B and F-4C. Whether or not the A-3 could be used as a stand-in for the B-66 at least as AI is a different story they had different noses and slightly different wings however as far as the AI is concerned I don't think the AI flight model is detailed enough to model the differences and it would be frustrating if we got a completely accurate EB-66 as it was a horrible POS that was more likely to crash from a flameout than get shot down. Having said that, depending on the cockpits I'd love to have an A-3 and B-66 module. I remember this back in the early 2ks, I'm wondering who did the SAM simulator I'd love it if they could turn this into a DCS module

I am familiar with the history of the B-66 my dad was an EWO on an EB-66 shortly after he graduated from the USAF Academy and before he went to medical school. Comparing the A-3 and B-66 to the F-4B and C is not an accurate comparison. First the B-66 and A-3 had almost no parts commonality and second The F-4C wasn't known for having flameouts on take-off. The B-66 was heavier with less powerful and reliable engines they used the same engines as the F3H while the A-3 used the same engines as the Buff An A-3 in USAF liveries would be a way more reliable plane.

I'll state the F-20 is low on my cold war list, however if there is enough information for an official module and its done by some new developer I'd have no issue

the A-3 and B-66 weren't the same aircraft they just looked the same. The Destroyer was a death trap with barely functional engines that were known flame out on a regular basis that the usaf ditched asap becuse the engines were deadlier than the north Vietnamese air defenses while the Skywarior was a reliable aircraft that barely missed desert storm.

Except fir the EF-4C the Phantom did most of its weasel work in the 1980s and 90s.

This is part of the reason I would love to see ED improve the user file section and have an official mod-manager.

We have the MiG-23 and 29 on the way and the fitter might use it as well.

I would like to know more about the launcher. A quick launch option would be nice though

does PImax hand tracking work?

We have the B I would love the D though.

The DCS naval environment is lacking quite a bit. The real question is what will provide us the most coverage

Yes please