upyr1

I'm asking if we can get later configurations as well. The class (especially New Jersey) served off and on until 1992

Yes

This would be awesome especially if we could add voices.

I can see two possible answers. option 1- crank down infantry hit points so that all if not most, hits are insta-kills. Option 2- toss in a damage model and medivac. The ideal human damage model might be the following. First is a floating-point to calculate HP. Next have a variable called wound-size. - Wound size would calculate how many hit points a solider loses every second. A healthy solider will have a wound size of 0 then when ever a solider gets hit wound size would grow based on the severity of the hit. Lastly, and an incapacitation check- This check a randomly generated floating point to see if you get 1 which triggers incapacitation the system might do a role every mili-second, starting at 20% HP loss and increasing until you hit 40% damage, where the role is always 1. The unit would continue to bleed based on the wound size. Lastly especially good for helicopter pilots wounded ground troops will hit trigger a dust-off or some sort of medivac. The compromise would be to incapacitate a unit once it hits X amount of damage and don't mess about with the bleeding. Still give us the medivac mission

This would be cool

I expect ED to shoot some of not all the ideas down. I'm going to go over each one. First paid ATC- ATC should be part of DCS core this is the type of thing that would really cause problems online. Improved terrain- most maps are already paid DLC. Wether or not people are willing to buy upgrades of stuff they already own comes down to cost and what they get. I could see a lot of interest in buying an expanded Pascific map that includes the Marianas (provided it won't melt your CPU) as well as an expanded Caucuses map using a set up like Afganistan where everyone gets access to a low detail map for online games. I could also see the same deal working for the Nevada map- make the expanded version the US South West which ideally would ideally include Fallon, Mirimar, and Holloman. If the developers could coordinate ED a massive Mid east map would be awesome. The idea for the mega mideast map would be ED would work on a very small strip around each map Dynamic campaign- I could see this going either way. I believe ED wants to make this part of DCS core, the main argument against doing it this way is I think it would have been done a lot sooner. As long as you don't need the dynamic campaign to connect to a server with a dynamic campaign running I don't see any issues.

I'd love the AC-47 configuration

yes there are stars in the southern sky and I want to see them. It would be awesome to have a historically correct night sky

Only if we get more period naval assets they retired from us service in 1993. Not saying no just saying it would be awesome for a cold war environment

Looking at this I'm wondering if this means anything in regards to the Razbam situation I didn't think you could do a multi-pack either way both would be awesome

I'd like both. They might be too different for a multi-pack but I'd buy both

I don't expect them to say much. I know there is a whole flotilla of rumors going about

The date left me wondering what it was an AI asset for the SA asset pack or a module

The Charlie Eagle can carry them

That's why I posted this thread. When the Hornet was first released it was basically the F-18 then they added the A-18 part over the years The CFT might not be modled in the Flaming Cliffs version but the C does carry them

This was dated 2019 and depics WIP shots of the Sea Harrier FRS 1. either these were intended to be AI or Razbam was working on a Sea Harrier module

Hopefuly this discussion will become moot before too long. I don't know how long it will be before 3.0 comes out but hopefully we'll get a settlement before they get depricated

Sure it wasn't the Sea Harrier FRS.51 or Sea Harrier F(A).2 I know in 2019 or so there were screenshots of a WIP Sea Harrier . The FRS1 used the Blue Fox and the F(a).2 used the Blue Vixen which was further developed into the Typhoon's radar The FRS.51 used the Euroradar Captor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euroradar_CAPTOR

I'd love to see voice command added too but the fewer AI GIBs we have the easier it will be

Something that should exist

Wag should mention the option in the AA refueling training videos

I'd like to know which varaint they were looking at? Knowing how things often work, the default is to go for the most advanced variant you can get documents for. The AV-8 we have may be the closest to the RAF bird Ideally if you have the originals you should at least get a deep discount to make up for the mess

If HB really is too busy to take on the F-15E then all I ask is that who ever picks up the ball at least discusses licencing Jester. HB has said that they would do that and I believe it would be nice to have a common RIO/WSO interface.

I'd be fine with different variants. I am thinking the variant we have is from 2003. So a storm bird would be awesome for the Germany map. It would be nice to see some French smart bombs and A2G missiles provided the data is available We really need to see the whole Harrier family. My thoughts. a Faulklands war era Sea Harrier Legacy Harrier- if the biggest differnce between the USMC and RAF variants is paint, then I don't care. With the Harrier II, the plus version is a must, I also think a British Harrier II variant would be nice as well which one I don't care as long as the differnce is more than just liveries Sinc the Mig-19 has been out of service for decades it might not be that big of a problem. The real issue is picking the variant. The biggest question here is how many systems does ED have the code for already? The only request I'd have is, please license Jester. If making the announcement results in RB's legal team popping up. The best outcome would be getting a multi-variant module because Rambam decides selling their code would be an easy out .

HB should have done the F-15E in the first place. Even though the WSO is optional in the MUD Hen it should have had Jester. As for the rest- I really don't have a prefernce as to who supports them. All I know is that if RB isn't willing to return to DCS or sell the rights to their module to another developer then they should start discussions about new modules.