Bananabrai

I know it’s outside the yellow line, but LIED (Decimomannu) pretty please For our Nado and the F-104 guys

Did anyone try to add R-27 on the center pylons? Or the fuel tanks? in order to extend the Range and still have 2x fox1 and 2x fox2.

Thanks mate, although we’re not using the Hornet for NAVY purpose, but will go for the Typhoon when it drops. We are doing RCAF Germany style field ops in EDAM. EDAL is sadly not in yet.

Interesting thoughts. I’ll give the 101 and maybe the 339 another go. My boys and me are mostly doing/trying milsim if anything. Ideally I would like to offer the whole lot (again), BFT/IFT on the YaK, BQT on the 101 or 339, IFF would be 100% on the F1BE for me (it’s just so much better suited for training than the F-5, in any regard), and then the B-Course on anything. ATM we’re doing a B-Course on the Hornet. But having resources for the whole lot is so difficult. I offered an IFT some years ago on the YaK, but instructors are rare, I did mostly everything alone and people went away after some BQT sorties on the 101, as I had to jump between the yak and the vacuum cleaner. Plus multi crew sync was really s… for years in the Yak. That much in terms of complete vs patched vs abandoned… We tried the 339 two tears ago. They took ages to fix bugs as well. We kept using the 101 then. Maybe we should do a GT, lets ask @OPEC again XD.

Just checked it, thanks. Was hoping the 339 is also patched regularly, didn’t check too far into the past.

Did anyone keep track which of the trainers (MB-339, C-101, L-39, Yak-52) is at least patched on a regular basis? To me it seems like all those “side” aircraft are abandoned more or less. But to be honest I also always forget to pay attention to them when I read the patch notes. Edit: Going back the last couple of patches, seems like the C-101 is still updated on a regular basis: DCS 2.9.19.13478, DCS 2.9.18.12722, DCS 2.9.17.11733 The Yak got a little fix as well once: DCS 2.9.17.12034

Was wondering since the release, who's idea the map icon was. It's mostly a US and USSR flag icon. The german flags are pretty tiny...

Was there. Was pretty cool. YES!

I think so as well. It all depends on so many factors, but in general I think the ED coders know their code, classes, etc pretty well. Also the CH-47 is at least system wise not as complex as an Apache, Hornet or Viper, and at least in the widest understanding in terms of modeling for DCS uses similar code etc. Then there is the FM but that is different for everything... In general I also think less complex modules like the WW2 birds took not as long as the complex ones, and they also got faster if I think about the Mossie for example. By now it's their 5th helicopter and I think they know what they are doing. Could still be 5 years out if they only have one guy sitting on it, in the end it is just speculation. What if it is 25 month out. Will you buy it then only one day later? Or not at all?

The kings are helping us to understand. How honored we can be. Lovely how much you care. And so professional... Ah sorry, forgot you said it is not your job, I guess I imagined the rest then.

I also didn't hear of particular good bombing equipment in the 104G.

I am not sure how much data HB has to improve it, in terms of accuracy and in terms of making it work with all current DCS radars again. But I also think it should be a little more accurate and also work better in terms of DCS. I think the ELINT performance of the Viggen and also the HTS are a bit nerfed. At least I have some knowledge/experience to believe so. But EW is also a very sensitive topic on the other hand.

So ist es. Hab schon nachgefragt bei ED, dürfen wir aber noch nicht haben. Ich mag Discord auch nicht mehr so gern, aber es natürlich auch einfach der bequemere Weg zu kommunizieren. Man kann Informationen (leider auch viele Sinnlose - siehe manche Posts) halt einfach viel schneller zu Verfügung stellen. Bis auf weiteres bleibt das also wohl erstmal so.

Was that 'no' to me? Because you were saying no but still making my point. Besides, you are not the only one flying real aircraft. And if you have flown so many aircraft, you should know that there are many air frame specific differences between aircraft. Or do you want to tell me a Cessna lands the same way and as easy/hard as a F-16, B747, C-130,...? Thus I still think that AAR per se is not always harder IRL than in a simulator. It will depend on many factors for both sides: what WX you face IRL, which aircraft do you fly, which type of AAR your aircraft uses, how "well done" are you after your (training-)mission. Same counts for the armchair flyer: VR or monitor, good frame rate or old rusty sh*t graphics PC, had a bad day or a good one, excited or annoyed, do you already know the module or not,...

Well, the FM got better, but the multi crew got worse I think. Maybe I was just unlucky that day, did it improve for one of you guys?

Might be air frame specific experience? Most pilots I heard, say it is easier IRL, same with learning to land a plane, as you have the complete package of feelings and correct view and not like on the computer a 2D Track IR or not perfect to real world VR view. But that were also probe fliers, mostly Tornado and Typhoon guys.

You choose the C-101 to be se*ier than the L-39? After I re-bought the Kamov now and enjoy the Hind so much, I need to fly the L-39 every now and then.

I wonder: - How you assumed our TOR as modern. It's a CW plane and we do the non-modernized CW version of it, which we stated. - And then the iCH-47 we are getting (w/ MFDs and modernized systems etc., like the AH-64D) as CW instead of modern (besides, there was an ingame video of that) - Same for the C-130J with MFDs glued everywhere as CW? - And in general the difference between 'Nam and CW (e.g.: F-4E -> CW ?) For your question: the J-8 probably is still some time away. But you'll rate it somehow.

Mir ist leider ne doppelte Plannung rein gekommen Wobei ich fast nochmal überlegen könnte, ob ich mit meinem Schwager Samstag dort hin komme, wäre eh kürzer aus Memmingen. Finde die location auf jeden Fall mega. Finde das könnte gut eine default location für 6x im Jahr sein.

I will try again with working ILS. I think it starts working from 6 knots wind @GND level.

Sounds awesome.

That's the issue.

B-1B, P-3C, ... so many nice big planes that offer interesting game play... Even a C-130H would be awesome.

In the Viggen slight differential breaking is working as well. Could work as well. I always disable the NWS in most planes, F1, M2000, F-15E, F/A-18, F-16... Mostly at 60 knots or even earlier, as soon as I know its rolling relatively straight.

Bonschab? Ist nich so weit von der Strada wenn man im Süden abfährt. Isch bloß die Manchinger Stroß nauf. Und vom HBF auch ned. Und parken kann man auch recht ok.