Bananabrai

Reflected hat dazu ein Video gemacht: DCS Normandy 2 Map & Campaign Updates Quintessenz: Die Missionen "funktionieren" technisch out of the box, die Normandy 2.0 ersetzt die Normandy "1" ja ersatzlos unter selber Referenz im Code. Dennoch sind Einheiten Teils nicht mehr korrekt positioniert, ich denke aufgrund von leichten Verschiebungen der internen XY-Koordinaten Referenz oder auch Gebäuden, die sich verschoben haben. Reflected musste wohl einiges anpassen, so wie zum Beispiel manche Einheiten ein paar Meter verschieben.

But you should include the Tornado...

Auf der Erde gibt es halt wenig Tiere, die nach dem Drehflügler-Prinzip fliegen. Auf anhieb kenne ich jetz keine^^

I love it

Was wondering the same. Wikipedia? M-Scan is no real joy mostly anyway.

Sorry guys, didn't read the pages 2-7, just a bit of p1 and 8. A friend showed me a rumor screenshot of the rearming window, with CFT fields... Just in case Razbam decides to make them removable, the Mudhen should get a lot closer to F-15D performance, shouln't it? And D is not too far off from C I guess. What do you think?

One thing I don't like about the 111, afaik the wings don't sweep any more if you put something on them. (the wing pylons cannot sweep)

I cannot support this enough! Both for sure!

In dem Zusammenhang erinnere ich mich an die angekündigte Cortex F/A-18E während ED schon an der F/A-18C gearbeitet hat.

Würde ich voll cool finden. Wie bei Belsimtek damals, die F-5E, UH-1H und Mi-8 kamen auch irgendwie aus dem Nichts. Zumindest subjekitv, vielleicht war ich damals einfach noch nicht aktiv genug im Forum. Aber mittlerweile haben wir so viele Module, so viel Spielzeug, bin dafür das einfach nichts mehr angeküdigt wird und dann... BÄMM... irgendein Modul direkt da ist (oder innerhalb von #really only two weeks nach Ankündigung^^)

Postponing (another) two weeks is never a problem.

Did I hear Wolkenmaus? True, but it's also always a question of how something is asked. Not by you in this case, but should possible to asked non salty. Besides, as an example, the MiG-21bis does also came with non bis liveries. HB also did a Grumman style factory livery for the Tomcat (and a Christmas livery) , which is not what we have, we have a FOC Navy Tomcat. Where to draw the line? I can ask HB kindly if they might want to do a Navy skin for the E, officially, why not?

is, not has Thanks for pointing out. But seems like you are not reading what people ask, or what people talk about in general. Instead you answer a question that was never asked, and what people already know. To quote myself with some buzzwords: - "I can feel the Harrier is really a US bird" - "role play" - "ALARM mod" Or by westr: - "possible to mod and add"

Good question. Three years ago I was building an ALARM mod from the AGM-122 (I renamed the seeker/weapon file and changed some parameters and added it to the harrier.lua something) But this is not possible anymore, there is no more access to these files sadly, at least that I know of. Was a blast to fly like this, 2 ALARM, 2 Tanks, 2 Aim-9, Jammer, UK skin... awesome, an this was not OP, you needed to know how to use it. I would really love to fly more UK style but I can feel the Harrier is really a US bird. GR.9, maybe even GR.7 is possible to role play, but with GR.5 it gets pretty hard.

Jeeeeez, how long will this discussion continue. 5 pages of speculation.

IDF/AF F-4Es had a probe refitted. Could be a nice ME checkbox thing, like with the JF-17

+1

Was meinst du mit "klappt nicht"? Was gibst du ein? Was gibt der Flieger zurück?

It's the AI, what do you expect? They don't need NVGs, they have NVG in their retina, it's part of their "eye-assembly"...^^

Ist die KI Teil deines flights oder nicht, also dein wingman? Das wäre wichtig zu wissen. Sonst sprecht ihr nämlich über 2 verschiedene Dinge. Eine frei fliegende KI braucht an einem beliebigen Wegpunkt die "Wegpunkt Aufgabe": Flugzeug betanken. (hab alles auf Englisch, daher kenne ich die genauen Wortlaute nicht) Also nicht als "Hauptaufgabe" in dem Reiter neben der Bewaffnung und den Wegpunkten, sondern im Wegpunkte Menü unter "advanced waypoint options" oder wie es heißt. Dann tankt auch eine B-52 an der KC-135 auf, sonst passiert nichts. Aus meiner Erinnerung gibt es Flieger die dazu mal zu doof waren, bspw. die KI Tornados. Ist aber schon länger her, dass ich das getestet habe.

Tankers would be the most essential to me to feel more immersed. The rest would be welcome for sure as well.

Awesome^^

A very annoying and frustrating fact. Wonder if this is getting changed at some point by ED. At least I think I remember they said they work on the AI.

Where is the radar located on this? More pictures, I am interested now.

Sounds like AIRBUS Industry standard. You sell a perfect product. Then you deliver 20% of. Then you say: ha, for this you have to pay extra, it is not included in the IOC... Imagine car manufacturers are doing this for steering wheels or brakes...^^ Anyways, enough OT, hope the Anton (an mostly all other modules and the core game) get some love again. Talking about core functionality here of course, don't need another USAF tailhook for now.