Agg

I have the same problem, I think I have flown this mission about five times now, and it crashes every time. Does'nt seem to be a clear reason for the crashes though, it can crash at any time during the flight, one time I flew the whole mission, landed and exited the mission, then DCS crashed and I got mission failed...

I was thinking the same as aceflier, I was hoping to spread this trailer around the Norwegian flight sim community, but I can't really see it doing much good. GA's A-10 trailer I'm sure got a lot of new people interested in DCS, I can't see this trailer doing the same.

I think I understand, will have a look after work today. Thanks :)

Maybe it's just me being daft, but Im not 100% comfortable with navigating the Eagle now. In FC2 you had a cross showing where the next waypoint is, now there's a line, but it does'nt seem to be locked in one place... How do I know where the next waypoint is?

From his Facebook page...

This was a really bad promo if you ask me... ED should concentrate on developing great sims, and leave the movie making to Glowing Amraam.

The greatest gpu in the world - real life ;) On topic; I was thinking the same thing when I saw the screenshots posted prior to release, but when flying I think it looks good.

The A-10C is an active duty aircraft...

Like Rusy_M says, it's almost identical to FC2, so if you liked that you're probably going to like FC3.

There is a boom, but no other effect. But it's like Demongornot say, we've been asking for this, and vapor effects for years, but I dont think ED have even commented on this.

I wonder if we'll ever get some decent vapor effects... I understand that it's not on the top of ED's "to do list", but still, people have been asking about this for years now. If we get a Hornet or Viper module without vapor I think Im going to cry :P

I dont think you have to worry about a SEAD aircraft being released this year...

Because it makes no sense for them to release a "half finished" Eagle now and then another one in six months. That's why I think that what we're seeing in FC3 now is the remnants of a planned Eagle module.

To me this is just more proof that the Eagle was going to be the next DCS module, but was dropped.

The Su-25T is the most complex aircraft in FC3. There is no deep systems simulation, no advanced flight model and no clickable cockpits. If you feel that the DCS aircraft are too complex then FC3 is for you, it might even help you understand a lot of the basics so that learning future DCS aircraft migjt be a bit easier.

There are some people working on F-16s, but if my memory serves me right, non of them are licensed third party developers. I think it's either a Viper or a Bug, and I'll be happy either way, although I would prefer a Viper. Let's hope it's announced soon, whatever it is.

My theory is that the F-15C was going to be the next DCS module, but for some reason it was dropped. Instead of just throwing away all the work that was done for the Eagle module they packaged some of it, like the cockpit, with FC3. I have no idea what the next module is, but I dont think it's an F-15.

Look again ;) I also like it, is it available for dowload?

Not sure if this helps, but sometimes I have to alt-tab out from DCS:W and back to get key commands to work. Could be worth a try :)

Actually, I was planning on buying FC3 for the improved landing and take off physics, but if there's no difference I think I'll pass, or at least wait a bit and see if it's added later.

Have'nt the dynamic landing and take off physics been added yet? So what Im getting for $40 is FC2 with a new cockpit in DCSW, or is there something else that's new?

Vanveken: Do the photographers know that you're posting their pictures here? Posting official promo shots and things like that is of course no problem, but posting people's pictures from airshows, like the Axalp pictures here, can turn ugly real fast.

Real deal, but not the same model...

Agreed, the pit looks nice :)

Maybe it's just me being picky, but the model is a bit too much off for my taste, especially the canopy is too "bubly".