Agg

Is the same the case with the F-16?

Looking forward to trying this, the wake effect and the engine smoke looks great, but I think I'll wait until the beta is over.

There's not really a whole lot to choose from. But if you like just flying around and doing aerobatics, maybe Aerofly FS is worth a look, it's far from the DCS standard, but so is FSX, P3D and X-Plane when it comes to aerobatics.

The shots are nice, but oh god how we need a new model for the F-16...

Nice one Extender. I have uploaded the "Mig Eater" so let me know what you think when it's available :)

Thanks guys, I was actually thinking about doing a Saudi one after this one :)

With Nevada on the way I thought it was about time that we get some desert Tonkas into DCS, it's far from finished, but I hope you like it so far :)

If you like BMS you should go for the Warthog instead of FC3 :)

It's the same here in Norway. Here's a Mustang producing the same effect (not my picture).

Love the Viper with CFTs :)

It's actually not that rare, I have also seen it quite a few times in person. The video below is a good example of what it looks like in real life. I have even seen a Mustang produce them ;)

Solo Türk, and the dutch F-16 demo team are easily the best F-16 displays out there, as well as some of the best fast jet displays in the world :)

Or a Norway scenery? ;) If I had a DCS-level Viper and a Norway scenery I would'nt need anything else :P

The Corsica map looks very nice, I'll agree that the Nevada screenshots were a bit underwhelming, but as it is WIP I will wait and see :)

Now this I am exited about :)

Looks great - will download and test it when I get home :)

I like it, but Im finding it hard to get very exited about it, but that has nothing to do with the quality of the module, just that I dont find the Hip all that interesting... Still it is a great product, and I am certainly going to explore it some more.

I do get slightly lower FPA when looking at it from the outside, but not so bad that I'd say it's a problem.

I agree, they should be longer. I think they use the same trigger as the old ones, which means that they only show up if you pull 6Gs or more.

Commenting on something that's not correct is not the same as saying that we dont appreciate the work that's being put into DCS.

I agree that more vapor effects need to be added, not too sure about the wingtip vorticies though, they seem to originate at some point below the wingtip, which just looks weird... Here's what the wingtip vorticies look like in real life. And this is what it looks like in game...

Im sorry to say that I agree with you gear_monkey, I love DCS, but Im so tired of the old scenery that I find myself spending more time on other sims. New DCS modules are great, but what we really need is some new scenery. And some tools, so people can start developing new sceneries.

It's quite nice, but a bit expensive. If you do a lot of flying in areas not covered by any other Orbx product it is certainly worth it. It improves the feel of the sim quite a bit.

Razbam were working on a MiG-29, along with about a hundred other aircraft, but were not allowed by ED to release it for DCS, so Im sure they have a plan for the Fulcrum somewhere down the line ;)

What's next? DCS: F-22, F-117 and B-2? I dont want to sound negative, but I was hoping that we would'nt have a lot of aircraft based on guess work in DCS. And I can't see how it's possible to make a realistic representation of an aircraft where most of the systems, and it's capabilities are classified.