FSKRipper

Ist bei mir auch so.

Wenn es dich wirklich interessiert kann ich das lesen des betreffenden Threads mal empfehlen. Weiter gehe ich nicht darauf ein da es zu sehr OT wäre. Was dich als Endkunden betrifft sollte dich das sehr wohl interessieren denn für eine "realistische" Simulation auf militärischem Level legst du dann gern mal eine fünfstellige Summe hin. Und genau deswegen wirst du IMMER Abstriche bei technischer Umsetzung, Simulationstiefe und Bedienbarkeit in Kauf nehmen müssen. Du zahlst nämlich letzendlich wie bei den echten Geräten für Entwicklung und Arbeitszeit und nicht für ein Produkt oder was glaubst du warum jedes militärische Großprojekt letztendlich das 2-3 fache kostet?

+1 Ich habe die Mirage und bereue es nicht. Die Leute die ständig wegen des Flugmodells quengeln sei ein Besuch in den Foren von BMS nahegelegt. Mavjp (der Flugmodellentwickler) hat dort kürzlich zu dem Thema Stellung genommen. Das grobe Fazit ist das keine Software zu 100% das exakte Flugverhalten in jeder Situation abbilden kann aber sehr gut approximiert. Durch die Simulation in virtuellen Windkanälen befindet sich das Modell der BMS F-16 auf einem Stand das weitaus realer ist als die Modelle und Simulationen der Lockheed Martin Ingenieure zur Zeit des Mauerfalls. In die von Razbam veröffentlichten Kurven zur Flugphysik der Mirage 2000 sind bei BMS übrigens knapp 1000 seiner Arbeitsstunden geflossen. Vielleicht denken einige Leute mal bitte zwei mal nach bevor sie anhand von Youtube Videos oder persönlichen Meinungen eine solche Arbeit zerreissen. BTW: 50% der BST Module haben heute noch kein volles Handbuch geschweige denn Trainings oder Kampagnen im Gegensatz zur totgeredeten MiG-21.

Won't be the bad guy here but according to your specs it doesn't matter what your performance was before the patch. Your system specs are way below the official minimum requirements! 1GB Video RAM is not longer a value to play with... http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=147710

Your system, your options, a track (would be the best)? Otherwise your report is simply irrelevant. I would also suspect you are flying in AG config...

You should always search the manual first. You simply can't get everything from YouTube. That's why combat pilots are still learn with books and charts :music_whistling:

I had this issue after first start. With my Saitek combat rudder pedals I Need to invert the brake axis for all my aircraft (A-10C, F-15C...). Did this also for the Mirage beforew flying it, that was a mistake. Tapping the peddals steered the aircraft in the wrong direction. Set it back to non-inverted, everything works as intended...

Unless you download and install the module it is only listed in your account and not bound to it (Even then you can unbind it) Sending a serial number won't work. Your friend has to create an account and then you can transfer the license of the specific module to his account name. All this is done via your personal settings on the DCS homepage after logging in.

Only if you have no problems with sitting on the ground for a couple of hours on a multiplayer server while your turbine is changed.

The Bo-105 is an extremely agile helicopter. As stated before the Red Bull Team owns one and you can find more than a couple of vids showing the aerobatic skills of this machine. The real deal when it comes to fighting is that trained helicopter pilots needed 3 years of extra education to move these tank killers like they were supposed to do. When an Apache Pilot speaks of NOE flight a German PAH-Driver asks for Oxygen :music_whistling: They operated at 10 feet AGL with high foward speed to reach their fire zones. Each of them was only a small sting to the enemy tank formation but since they operated in groups where the helicopters were independent from each other and every helicopter was carrying 6 missiles, they could hit like a swarm of african killer bees on a afternoon tea party :megalol: [ame] [/ame] [ame] [/ame] And one in english.... [ame] [/ame]

Do you realize that LNS is developing for two different versions at this time and that most 2.0 players have real problems instead of not real recorded audio? :music_whistling:

Thanks for this great campaign Dragon. Already played the old one but alone the voiceovers are worth every cent of the new version. :thumbup:

Not to mention the much increased cancer risk when working on emitting Radars.

Heute bestellt, bin schon gespannt :pilotfly:

Updated to 1.5.2, back to the old problems...:cry:

Hey guys, updated to 1.5.2 mission is instant action L-39 free flight the arms of the pilot are creating a strange windmill effect (even with pilot switched off). To be sure you can see it, I added some screens in addition to the track. L39.trk

Would be nice if you could be more specific. FC3 at it's release or FC3 in it's current form? It will make a big difference if you take a SFM Su-27 to the party or the current PFM (for that reason I refused to touch the MiG-29 the last years).

Would be ok for me as these planes are belonging to the Korea/Vietnam area with the possibility to get an AFM in the future. But new toys like the F-22 or F-35 as one klick one kill machines with a very forgiving SFM would be a nogo for me, at least in multiplayer matches.

Most important download for NTTR :thumbup:

You speak of possible bugs of a module that is not even released, you take your meaning from a YouTube video and if you don't prove us wrong, you are not an actual Gazelle Pilot like the advisors/test fliers of this module. Speechless :doh:

The sources please. Also a set of performance charts would be nice :music_whistling:

Seems that you have some flight experience with this one... reliable printed sources for FM behaviour? printed construction plans with labeling of "These parts from other ac"? reliable printed sources for Nighthawk avionics? Not found, sure, they simply not exist in unclassified versions. 1. classified documents are a nogo for the developers. 2. unclassified material (especially of this jet) is very rare. As with most DCS models, Youtube documentations and chit chat are not reliable sources.

Nice plane, but I would vote against it. You won't get even a handful of documents which are not classified so most of the FM, avionics and system modeling would be some kind of reading coffee grounds. Maybe an idea for Ubisoft but not for DCS...

Currently weekly but as the almighty says: Everything is subject to Change :music_whistling:

:megalol: Do you really think you will get this before release? The latest patches including the famous 1.5 were out before the whole public was informed by mail and the DL rates dropped to the cellar. I would take it as a breaking news since it indicates a release during the next 7 days...