Skitter

From what I've read , the real M2000C doesn't have a missile warning system. Can't find the post now. EDIT: Ah! Here it is: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2696379&postcount=1154

Will try :thumbup:

Yeaa....maybe I am too used to attack in a slower aircraft like the A-10 :-) I still think it's risky. On the other hand the AI are quite capable of tracking and accurate firing, IMO more than they would in RL. But that's just my feeling, I am not a military.

Wouldn't it be risky if it was a combat scenario ? I mean, it would be quite risky in A-10C and it's pretty armoured. If I am right your are attacking BTR-80s and overflying the target? They do have machine guns. Just a thought.

Mon Dieu !!! :shocking:;) Thanks for replying.

Hi, Are the air-brakes in the real Mirage work the same way - only open / only close ? I wonder if this is going to be changed/implemented differently on later stage ? Cheers

A.W.E.S.O.M.E !!!

That's a good question.

Do you know if CCRP or CCIP in the Mirage compensates for the wind at all ?

Did you see that...!! There is a switch forward right of the throttle saying "SPA" !! Those Sweeds are a bit crazy about the sauna and well-being thing, aren't they ?

Hey Nomedeplume, I asked about bomb on coordinates because of the video below. Hopefully the link will take you to the right spot, but if not fast forward to 2 minutes 5 seconds. Cheers.

Admit you just wanted people to read your PC specs and modules list !

That's exactly the information I needed, thanks very much.

Hi guys, I wonder if those who play on-line and have experience with various aircrafts could tell me if the M2000C is suitable for CAP and Air Interdiction missions? Regarding CAP, what is the fuel efficiency comparing to other DCS aircrafts? Would it be able to keep up with threats popping up ? Have anybody tried playing with Air Interdiction missions? I can see there is a limited supply of flares and I think CCRP can't be done on NAV points at the moment? The cluster anti-rwy bombs, can you use them as general purpose cluster bombs too? I know the version is a fighter...or rather an interceptor? Cheers

Do you actually expect to have a discussion? And the reason for your omniscient position in discussion is: Also, you feel it's unfair to point out that somebody posted a link to wikipedia page as a proof of his point without even reading what the article says? That's peculiar.

After reading "Bandits over Baghdad"...yes please !

Just citing your source, wikipedia. It says: Generally = usually. Then... Have you purchased the game with early access discount ? Yes, the game in Beta was discounted. Were you able to preview Beta version for Christmas ? Yes

Yea, I heard that aircrafts stalled and crashed after pilots were ordered over a loud speaker to "pull over".

Not a radar specialist, but I think this will be more realistic. Thanks very much DArt :thumbup:

Hi DArt! What I mean is , shouldn't all of new contacts be "unknown" at the beginning, even if they are blue ? I mean, should the contacts have side anyway (blue/red) ? It should be up to the radar operator right ? I'd think the operator would put names to the contacts, as they appear on the display and are being identified, be either pilots talking to the radar operator, or being passed by other controllers. Not trying to be funny, just thought it would add to the play. Not sure how the real one works?

I've got a question keep coming back to my mind. Why, when a contact appears on your radar screen for the first time it already has a name from the mission editor. I don't know how a real radar diplay looks, but, shouldn't it be "unknown" or something ? :-) Cheers guys.

That's very cool. I am just worried there is no radio microphone activation.

Is it me ? Since 1.5 I have a mouse pointer when looking through the binos view. Normal mouse pointer like in the system (Windows). Also moving the binos around is awkward. It is not very responsive.

It's really hard to believe for me that people who have a rant are not forum regulars. I suspect the majority of people who buy a pre-released or beta version must have been watching the plane for a while. And come on, the plane is out since Friday and they have already managed to fly enough to have a strong opinion? They are hardcore simmers. If thet are hardcore simmers, they knew where to find the info. They knew where to complain right? It's probably many things.... If you have never worked with clients, customers, you don't know how to deal with them and you can't appreciate the very openes of Razbams developers. Some are just not mature enough to think and then type. Have no moderation. Don't look at the balance of for and against. Some people behace like little children who are crying to see how much they can get out of complaining. Some people are just lazy and don't like to read Others have a bad day...or bad week, or bad life... In the end of the day, it was't hard to get information whats in the package , quite the opposite. We are all serious about the simming here. If somebody payed that much money without actually checking what they are paying for. Come on. They don 't give a crap anyway. It wasn't compulsory to buy the plane in beta, right? If you spend enought time to read about requirements specification for a beta ersion, maybe you should consider a different hobby. Or maybe you should have had spend that time reading about what the Mirage beta will be? I mean, the Razbam was so open about everything. There were Q and Answera from ED. I actually received reply straight from the devs. It was an honest answer. The Razbam did a 1st class job in devs <> hardcore simmers comms. I have no sympathy for the people who have a go at Razbam now.