D4n

You tested it with another player? It occurs on multiplayer servers with markers from other players. I have trackfiles, but they are huge...

Still happening... Please fix asap.

not comparable in which way, which systems have more raw processing power (FLOPS)?

STILL bugged!!! added tags "very high priority mp bug - causing trouble within pvp teams due to not being able to ask the marker-creator (player) about status of his markers" and "bug since nearly 1 year now".

the star-icon doesn't indicate in any way if server-list is sorted ascending or descending on favorite servers. (sometimes they appear on top, sometimes on bottom.)

very unrealistic afaik, due to ground-clutter. AWACS point is to detect flying (low-flying aswell, okay, but mainly high-flying) aircraft. "was" ? ~65 E-3 are still in use in NATO and other countries... With the updated description, that it now detects aircraft on runways? (Just asking to be sure that the report is updated to the team.) @BIGNEWY

But doesn't that mean that it does image-processing, which requires huge processing power? So AIM-9Xs have something like an Intel i9 or hexa-core Ryzen 5 (or even Threadripper) in them? (processing-power wise.)

Aaaand another crash, this time probably related to waypoint-logic. Thank god this time DCS-crash-reporter most likely managed to transmit the crash to ED. (would be nice to get a "crash-data submitted succesfully"-message btw...) dcs.log-20201228-142737.zip

There is no public source indicating that an AIM-9X can distinguish very hot flares from a (not so hot) idle jet-engine, correct? May it depend on the types of flares used? And ED never claimed that they have access to data that they aren't allowed to share, right? So this trackfile would prove to be a valid DCS bug-report? What one can definitely say is that it ruins the DCS PvP experience for all those players on the opposite end, to have a basically un-evadable thrust-vectoring missile like that one... There you go.... ~8 out of 10 -9X hitting the idle-engine Harrier... PreFlare AIM-9X impossible.trk

CTD upon changing MFD colors in Harrier (a new feature which Razbam didn't mention anywhere apparently......) dcs.log

Still taking quite long.

ground-crew currently only replies "copy", which confuses new DCS players that don't know that wheel-chocks-removal was added to the ground-crew-operations queue and will be done after rearm/refuel is completed. Please add "copy, will do after refueling/rearming operations completed" (for example, or some more realistic military communications-reply, to inform the pilot/customer that it will be done after other operations are complete.) Or "copy, will do after other ground-operations are completed" for example. (example trackfile of the issue added) WheelChocksQueueExampleHarrier.trk

Fixed if Harrier is in shelter, but still is bugged if aircraft is on the runway, like in this new trackfile: AWACStestHarrierOnRunway.trk Intended behaviour would be that Harrier doesn't become visible on F10 map until it reaches a specific altitude.

Example .miz: slotTest2.miz

Affected is Android 8.1.0, same Chrome version as you. Please try to reproduce on a 8.1.0 device.

See here, over half the size already downloaded (16 of 23.8 GB), but progress bar is at ~40%. Please match progress bar to download-size, not to unpacking-size, as for most customers, download-speed is the slowing bottleneck, not SSD file-unpacking-speed. Thanks

Well... HB staff not marking this thread as [fixed] leaves space for debate whether they even trust (let alone test) their own fixes... xDD

Does this have any effect on this big and frustrating issue? https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/246848-wrong-sd-10-position-data-export-using-tacview-as-proof/

Visit https://forums.eagle.ru/search/ Enter "abc" or something, scroll down (keyboard remains open), hit "Search Content", keyboard then closes and search does not start, user again has to tap "Search Content" to start the search...

Aaaah, maybe THAT (one of those 2 doors) is that "thump" noise that I am wondering about since over half a year!!

Our D Apache gets the super useful AGM-114L fire-n-forget Hellfire aswell, right? (Would be a main selling point for me.)

Not according to ED, according to them, 120GB SSD is "recommended" for a typical DCS World installation (https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/world/beta/) Creating symbolic link is a process that's not easy for most DCS players. Not even close to 480GB okay, but definitely more than a 240GB SSD. So you don't own Normandy, PersianGulf and Syria? But you (ED) could've posted a warning that the average ED customer will require a 480GB SSD.

Am quite disappointed that today's OB patch is the first OB patch requiring 480GB SSD or bigger (I have 240GB) and ED not having mentioned this in neither these patchnotes nor in a separate forum- or Discord-post. Cannot fly PvP MP now for several days until my just-ordered 480GB SSD arrives. Very disappointing christmas-situation here... (and many others aswell probably)

How many of you fly Harrier in your squad PvP sessions?

Not if the warping occurs 30 meters away from missile