D4n

Well, Heatblur? Please reply/post a statement within the next 2 weeks please. Ok, more time then, within the next 3 months please.

Still happening. (report ~6 weeks ago)

@Cobra847 well?

Why would this be intended @BIGNEWY ? Some servers use a system where enemy players are marked on the F10 map (if spotted by AWACS), in those cases, rapid switching between F1 and F10 views occurs often. And even IF this would be intended, the label button in the top bar in F10 is still pressed when switching... has been the case since march 2020, just fyi.

wow, over 4 years later and still happening..

Yes, I tried to indicate that the audio-spectrum is wildly fluctuating with this new harrier engine sound, sorry.

Hopefully tagging @xcomhere will make him notice & read your post (and maybe my previous 2 posts here aswell. I just edited the previous one, now it is even more polite.).

fixed, added video to demonstrate.

Why would the engine make sounds as if strong wind-turbulences are causing sound-waves to change directions? (or what else is happening here that we hear this? What is the source for this sound, a real Harrier pilot?) (no wind: )

negative, could not even beat level 10 xD did anyone get past 10 ?

Please patch the game to feature a pause-key. "P" for example, or "pause" key. (for alt-tabbing to other applications)

We'll see... I doubt it's a guaranteed "802 will also be (more or less automatically) working again as soon as the SLAM-ER works"....

Dear HB team, on november 4th you promised the DCS community that you would "write up a guide on the new FARP mechanics", has this guide been released yet? If not, why not yt? (there's also basically still not a single YouTube video out there that explains how to use them in mission editor) @Cobra847@RagnarDa And does only server-admin require Viggen module to place invisible FARP in his mission, or will even all players require it to rearm, refuel and repair on that type of FARP? (the insanely epic realistic invisible FARPs add so much more realism!)

Wow over 600 views after only 4 hours, imagine if even only half of those applied, that email inbox would be bomb-full oh dear, good luck!

RFQ? Where did you read that? And what should not be serious here? That Website looks quite legit to me.

"robbie tank" might refer to this (not sure where the term "robbie" comes from.): https://robertsonfuelsystems.com/defense/combo-pak-internal-auxiliary-fuel-system-iafs/

What's your source for this? @microvax

What?? How would you know?

Yes, please find a solution, please move the older "guides & tutorials" forum into the new section for example... DCS forum main page is already long enough...... (even WITH russian- and language-forum sections collapsed!!!! see below picture...)@NineLine

"Out of range"-definition for TOR is plain wrong currently, the trackfiles/videos prove it (missile still has speed to easily reach target, but then simply explodes). negative, nothing about "hijacking" in rule 1.14. Rule 1.5 is about "hijacking", but my SAM post is related to @Mad_Shell's post about reeeally detailed complaining about what's wrong with SA-2 currently.

There still is this way worse Tor issue......

I'm not so much, especially after it was claimed that "Up until now, neither myself (RAZBAM Elmo) or the dev team have found it to be in-accurate by any means"

Strange, because afaik, each missile is launched manually on SA-2, not automatically x seconds after 1st missile.....

Then link to the OP instead of to the entire thread please, thanks... avoids unnecessary confusion @Flappie https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/253259-already-reportedsa-2-misses-100-of-the-time-due-to-lag-pursuit/?tab=comments#comment-4485567

OMG NICE!! (I feared I wouldn't witness this day ^^) your "this track" link is wrong though, @Flappie