Hook47

C

X

No problem, it was worth a tinker!!! Thanks a ton for this, it has brought the mirage to a whole new level for me!

Anyone know if the BLU-107 Durandal can be modded on? I want to try but I do not know the lau code for it.

Shouldn't be that hard to figure out, Azrayen. Between the Magic II sucking and the ability to carry two extra missiles, the reasons for using the mod are obvious :)

Sounds like someone is seeking third party status? ;)

Haven't got to play around with it yet, but what about the AIM 7?

Google the massive Simhq forum debacle.... I'd rather not drag it here as it was very petty

Thanks guys, rep to both of you!

All the news we ever seem to get these days is apologies and "soon" so I totally understand the OPs frustration. The drama with Tango (former developer) is also a major reason behind the delay I think

Sure is quiet over here.... Any news?

Awesome!

Thanks for this. Once the Viggen drops I'll be making a mission based on if this had gone bad in a more modern kind of setting

It's not like we are asking for a GBU on a P-51 here, guys.... The ARMAT isn't out of no where, it could have been on the plane at some point and was on exports

You the man! Looking forward to it! Me and my pals will put it to use right away! +Rep

GR9 is pulling ahead!

I think getting a carrier is a sure thing. Even the modded carrier we have now is pretty good, but either ED or LNS will surely push out a carrier

Jesus... The pissing contests have reached new levels here on the M2000 forums. Off to the AJS 37 side of things.

Freaking amazing... How do you get the Lau7 twin Aim 9s on the M2000? As in what lau edit would I need to make?

How about that doesn't take 30 seconds of Lua editing.... Do you really think we would bother with putting the AIM 9 on if it was THAT easy? Way to be a party "breaker" Besides I have read in several places the AIM 9 could be fitted to the M-2000C. And even if that WASN'T the case. . . It is a mod!!!!!!!! :doh:

Awesome man, thanks for this... Now for the AIM 7/R-27ER for the inner pylons :thumbup:

I'm confused... If the Magic II is only marginal improvements of the Magic I, and the Magic I actually sucked, wouldn't the Magic II kind of suck? Maybe ED has it right and we are all wrong... :megalol: I sure hope not!

I have no intention of using it on a server that doesn't allow such, this will be mostly for coop play with my pals. Would love to figure how to do twin pylons if possible Can other weapons be stuck on using similar edits? Say a AGM 88 for SEAD (In lieu of the ARMAT)? I guess the aircraft not having the avionics for such a weapon right now would be an issue though, right?

Thank you God. I will be trying this right away. . . Will it jack up integrity checks? Thanks for posting Any chance of getting dual AIM-9 pylons to work in a similar fashion?

It isn't even remotely about the latest technology mattering. ARMAT isn't that great of a missile, It's about the fact that we have three trainers, three interceptors, several strike aircraft and a bunch of WW2 planes, a highly experimental prototype of a helicopter but only ONE aircraft that can do SEAD, and now that we have another aircraft that could have been/was capable of SEAD, and it is believable and possible to mount said weapon, we would love to have it. Especially since it was originally stated to come with the aircraft and show on early WIP screen shots. If you want to stick to reality then P-40s and 109s shouldn't be in the same sim as a M-2000C anyway, the FC3 aircraft shouldn't exists because they, while realistic, are very far from reality... This is a combat sandbox. . . If you don't want the weapon you don't have to use it or even fly SEAD sorties