Hook47

All very interesting stuff, G suits are something I don't know much about so good to learn. All this being said, how long could a mirage pilot actually hang with the 9g sustained turn the plane boasts? From the above 9 Gs sounds like it would get serious even with a G suit

Awesome video, we need that nasty looking black smoke trail in the sim once we get the weapons for the AJS 37 I'm quickly finding myself looking forward to this aircraft more than any other release since the MiG 21. Cannot wait to get my hands on it! That was the last year of active Viggen service, correct? I'm assuming you still see some at authors these days?

It seems right now that even though the IL 78 has three booms, only two extend, I would love to be able to do three of Razbam adds a so equipped tanker

+1 Great idea and looks pretty simple to implememnt. Would like to see

I'm assuming the M2000 pilots have a G suit comparable to the western technology. I am not too up on G suits but IIRC they can keep the pilots lights on up to about 10-12Gs, correct? Good work on the turn rate testing in the other thread BTW, I am sure that contributed to fixing it, and as much as I like fighting M2000 vs Mig 21 from both sides, the Mirage needs its real life turn rate (even if it messes up the match up... As it is now it is already a mistake to turn with a mirage based on low speed handling alone)

Cool! Seems like any options like this get stuck in the special menu for the aircraft, though, I would love to see ED refine the aircraft load out panel to add some more options on the fly. Backing out to the menu gets old I'm afraid.

Tried this today. It was a PITA at first but once I got the hang of managing the throttle it came together. Hope this gets fixed in the upcoming patch!

This is freaking amazing news. I cannot wait for this feature. Is there any possibility of pilot night vision in the M2000C? That would allow the pilot to have a chance at confirming the lased target I should think (during night ops anyway) I'll see if I can get confirmation on the A-10C JTAC test at NTTR in the next day or so.

I guess things will get more interesting on the M-2000C Vs MiG 21 server post this upcoming patch, I see STT rate has been tweaked on the internal build

Chuck, Just wanted to say I've been using your guide to teach this plane to a group of guys I fly with, and it is outstanding! We appreciate your continued high quality work (All credit has been given to you during my instruction btw)

So you are saying my "behaviour" has led you to believe I would cheat? Because I didn't agree with you on some aspects about ARMAT implementation and don't suffer passive aggressive remarks from other users? Sigh... Seems petty to assume bad about me because I disagree about a stupid missile in a PC game. I don't assume negative things about anyone here, even the guys who get my ire with their posting style. As far as what you said about missile implementation that is what I have wanted from the start. I think if at least a decent guesstimation could be made put it in, if not then leave it out, even if it is a bummer. What I don't care about is if it was ever used on the aircraft, because unlike the current DCS world situation, the French never needed to press it into SEAD service. It sounds like RAZBAM still is considering putting it in anyway based on that exact criteria a few pages back, and if they can come up with something I would hope it would satisfy all crowds. I enjoy the realistic aspect of the simulation but I think there is room for addition here or there if it can be done in a realistic manner.

Make what clear? As if I didn't know. And those who are breaking the rules are getting banned for it, on the 104th at least. People could always easily cheat on DCS if such a crowd was commonplace, it isn't the modders fault. On other servers, if it isn't against the rules, who cares? It's their choice. Geez wasn't this thread about that... shoot... what was it called again? Oh yea, the ARMAT missile!

Ok, and I said I would do that where? Come on, man. . . Beyond that, you gave me absolutely zero indication you were talking about MP until after you clarified.

*Double post*

Ah, I see. You miss the constant little digs made by Tomcatmcduwee, most of which I ignore, but if I return in kind it is "trolling" There is no rule about keeping mods to yourself, sir, at least not on the forum board. If someone made an ARMAT mod tomorrow they would have every right to post it here (although I would feel sorry for what they would have to put up with) and before you get harsh with me for giving the other dude a taste of his own medicine, remember he popped in on the Aim 9 Mod thread to do nothing but gripe at other people using it. That is actual "trolling" I guess that is because he agrees with you, and I don't. What facts have I ignored? I've said multiple times I don't care if the ARMAT was used on the M-2000C. I've said multiple times adding it is no more or less immersion breaking than non-french liveries (a point yet to be refuted) and I have ALSO said that if their is no way Razbam can do a realistic launch sequence or operation then so be it. Seems you have ignored some things here, not I. The need to circle the wagons with the vocal view who don't like this is beyond me. If someone made a thread about a weapon on the plane that I didn't want, my response would be far more limited. Oh well, I guess it's a purism addict thing. Forget it, I am out. I planned on being done with the thread anyway since we haven't been allowed to actually discuss the missile very much, and spent more time talking about DCS becoming war thunder. I'll leave you guys to discuss how the ARMAT will turn DCS into a arcade game overnight, and spam responses to anyone who disagrees within 30 seconds of their post :lol: I guess you must have missed my above post? Not surprising, that would have required you to actually read my thoughts before launching off half-cocked personal digs. . . Doesn't seem to be your thing I suppose.

You sure you can handle me having a mod? Based on your freak out in the AIM-9 mod thread and all somehow doubt it. . . :megalol: I love the "OMG DCS WILL BE WAR THUNDER!!!" crowd. In addition from my real world flying week in and week out, I spend hours a week on a sim where it takes 10 minutes to start the A-10 just to be told I don't care about realism by some cat who acts like he knows me (despite 90 percent of his "quotes" of me to be either completely self generated or inaccurate) :lol: This thread... It all started so nice and then the nay sayers came along. God help the guy who just started the MICA thread!

Totally agree! Can't wait for development to get rolling on this thing. I would say finish the M-2000C first but the amount of fixes on the RAZBAM internal build instills great confidence in me, so if they can do both at once I say go for it!

Bummer... What was gained by sacrificing the cannon? Anything besides less weight? LOL! Awesome Awesome anacdote, thank you for that! I think that sums up how the Viggen looks perfectly... It's beefy yet elegant look is growing on me by the day, I just can't wait to see LNS rendition of this bird. They really picked a winner with this aircraft, it is going to bring so much more to this sim

Wohoo! Keep on pulling ahead, GR9! I was worried the AV-8B would win

You of all people have an issue with someone cherry picking your post? LOL :megalol: Using your own words to demonstrate how rediculous that reasoning is.... No. Because the MICA was not hung on a M2000C/E to my knowledge, yet the ARMAT was. I'm done with this topic, as some of those opposed to this just don't want to be rational. Razbam has stated they are still considering it, so that is good enough for me.

Oops... Too late, looks like thanks to the A-10 you've been playing "digital combat fantasy" all this time. Better get to work on the uninstall then.

It is definitely a cluttered mess right now. The launch warning isn't as important to me as just being able to read it.

I won't lie guys, I spent the last few days cheating with the hot new French thing that's been all the rage, but last night I hopped back into my MiG cockpit and realized it is still the plane for me... Until the next LNS product ;) There is a lot of really good modules for this sim, but this bird tops them all without breaking a sweat! Thanks for all the work that went into the product, and that you will do in the future!

That seems like a fine way to kill yourself... I don't think it was that you lacked guts, but rather had too much sense

Mentions what? All I ever hear for the MiG is high praise, same for my friends some of which recently bought it based on how great of a module it is. It certainly ranks as one of the best. If you are talking about the Grom I've never heard or seen anyone either not buy or been told not to buy the MiG because it has the Grom lol, and I personally love the Grom and have had a lot of fun with it despite the couple of people I've seen on the forums complain about it (who don't even own the MiG IIRC). Oh well, to each their own. I am just glad to hear Razbam is still considering it after they do the other weapons that I am also looking forward to using!