Focha

Interesting project. Can you tell us more about the costs associated with it? Keep those pictures fresh, please. It is always amazing to me, how you guys can do it, I can't. :(

I've made a list, not with the objective to have all the aircraft listed there. Just to point out a few by order of my preference. It doesn't mean that people would like to see that on DCS. The list could be easily reduced to the following: - Grumman C-2 Greyhound (A variant); - The Mighty Lockheed C-130 (H variant); - Alenia C-27J Spartan (J or A variant); - Transall C-160 (D version); - Fairchild C-123 Provider (K variant); - Antonov An-12 Cub (A variant); - Antonov An-26 Curl (A variant). Or even more: - Grumman C-2 Greyhound (A variant); - The Mighty Lockheed C-130 (H variant); - Antonov An-12 Cub (A variant). And more: MC-130. ${1}

Hard in that it would be difficult to get good arguments to have that kind of aircraft regarding the scale of the world maps in DCS or because the aircraft is still in service and could be difficult to extract data. I missed An-12, I've added it. Thank you.

I would really like to see a transport aircraft on DCS. It would be interesting for the logistics role. For me, the most wanted would be: - EADS CASA C-295 (M variant); - Grumman C-2 Greyhound (A variant); - The Mighty Lockheed C-130 (H variant); - Alenia C-27J Spartan (J or A variant); - Transall C-160 (D version); - Fairchild C-123 Provider (K variant); - Fairchild C-119 Flying Boxcar (G variant); - Antonov An-12 Cub (A variant); - Douglas C-47 Skytrain (B or D variant); - Grumman C-1 Trader (TF-1 variant); - Antonov An-26 Curl (A variant); - Nord Noratlas (2502F variant). Others that I would like to see by preference, but hard to achieve: - Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey (A or MV-22B version); - Lockheed C-141 Starlifter (C variant); - Airbus A400M Atlas; - Lockheed C-5 Galaxy (A variant); - Boeing C-17 Globemaster III (A variant); - Ilyushin Il-76 (M variant); - Antonov An-178; - Embraer KC-390. It would be great to see at least some tactical lifter like: C-130, C-160, C-123 or smaller like C-27, CASA 295, An-72... Thank you. Kind regards.

A little bit off-topic, can you guys tell me what are those two missiles aft of the LGB? Thank you. RP: Brimstone missile, found it. Thank you.

Ok Sir, but I have the freedom to ask for it if I don't seem to find it. Those kinds of posts are completely useless, a waste of time. If I have difficulty using this software, which I have paid for, I think it is my right to say what is not right for me. Even if it is a subject beaten to death. Thank you for the other replies. On my screen is just to hard to spot air targets, and it seems that there are folks who always spots me... The object to increase object size was not so bad. I'll try your solutions.

Finally, someone who can speak about the problems I wrote a long time ago. I only flew AS365 and AS350 in real life (plus training in R22, R44 and some Ka-32), can't speak about the Gaz, but sure doesn't feel like a helicopter. Mi-8 and Huey feel more like a helicopter. Although as you said... VRS like that and we would all be dead. Huey also feels... mmm... how can I say it... elastic in the FM. For me, the best FM to describe a helicopter in DCS would be Mi-8, and Ka-50, because I flew a Ka-32 and feels a lot like it. But Gaz, definitely does not fly as a helicopter. I flown the AS350 B2 and B3, they are a bit heavier than the Gaz and doesn't have all the SAS/aids that the military Gaz have, but... helicopter physics are helicopter physics. Extremely complex at the macro level but understandable if you break it down. As Jester986 said... a PC sim is what it is... even in the multi-million sims that we train, it is not the same thing. But... I reinforce, the Gaz have big flaws. I've always defended that. Good to know, that they are assuming that there is a problem, and they are going to work to fix it. Finally!

Hard time spotting targets visually. There was once an option to increase the size of the render resolution on the aircraft. What can I do to improve the target visual acquisition? It is really hard to see anything.

+1

Well... in RL you are a bit more flexible. Sometimes aircraft are upgraded after the production line with more systems during their operational lifetime. I don't know specifically about the KA-50 but I know about some other aircraft that were being constantly upgraded with newer systems in some Air Forces.

No problems with it... but still too hard to be of any help.

Hi guys, Is there any way to improve the IFLOLS brightness or size? Right now is pretty unusable, to be honest. Is there is any work around this, what is the status? I find that the lights on the Tarawa are much easier to spot. Thank you. Regards.

Happened to me also. CTD in MP.

Impossible is a strong word. Aren’t they developing A/G radar?

Thank you for taking the time to explain that. Cheers!

Although in real life you can’t hear the sound of switches (headset, noise) I think in the sim you should hear it. It gives you feedback if the switch was toggled or not or the button clicked. Mouse is not enough. In RL you feel the switch going into position. Many switches are made to give you some kind of reassurance that are in place, like notched plates. In the sim you don’t have it. I like HB F14 because of that, it gives you feedback. I like F18 even more, but the switches are not so audible. In the F14 the sound of the avionics is the same as for the Viggen. But I agree that RAZBAM must developed better audio.

What ED API? Are they working on something? Any work in progress about those APIs? Thanks.

Hi, Was the TPOD changed and the coordinates have been removed? I can't find the coordinates on the MFD TPOD page. Is there any option to show it or any other way to transmit the coordinates from the TPOD designation point? Thank you and sorry if this was already asked, I used the search but I can't find any information related to it. Kind regards,

The Tornado would be awesome in fact, with the developed tech for the F-14 RIO.

I like the harriers in that movie. Quite nice. It does not look like a bad CGI.

We are not bitching, we are just saying critically that the F-5 cockpit looks a bit flat compared to the new cockpit releases. And that it is not on par with the latest DCS graphics.

Can you show it?

+1

It is really unbalanced right now with the F-14 arrival. No one is playing in the non F-14 side... or at least, there is less players...

OMG :thumbup: Ehehe. Nothing more to say. Best module ever. :pilotfly: