Bourrinopathe

The T-Rudder pedals can be used standalone yes. Connecting the pedals to the Gladiator will only allow to see the pedals as an additional axis for a single control device (they'll be identified as the Gladiator's Z axis). There are two options for the centering feeling: a hard center and there's also a smooth center (more suitable for the helos). You have to reverse the cam to change the feeling.

Good news with a significant step forward: the Gladiator and the Gladiator Pro are available for pre-orders. Also, the Gladiator twist axis is contact-less (magnetoresistive) and, afaik, it's the first joystick to offer that :thumbup: I'm wondering if it can be used with Elite Dangerous ^^

Very interesting indeed ;) Here's a 720p version: [ame] [/ame]

I also hope it will be fixed. I thought it could have something to do with a test rather than a mistake as the in-cockpit (fake) reflection looks artificial/flat using stereoscopy (VR / anamorphic rendering) (as well as any mirrored image). No idea if the two are linked (external shininess reflection and in-cockpit reflection) (3D model common material definition?)… It still looks less interesting and realistic for most of us though.

Hi and thanks for the poll. I voted "no" for the same reasons expressed here (by user Angusozi on /r/hoggit). I'd prefer seeing more russian aircraft like the MiG-21Bis as long as they benefit from a high level of fidelity we'd expect from DCS. (also, I'd largely prefer seeing less aircraft projects and more content projects (high quality campaigns, training missions, single missions, etc.)).

Congratulations! It looks really great! :thumbsup: Was it rather easy to use the Warthog adapter on the F-15 grip (no more than five wires?) and does it feel solid enough to endure many flight hours? What controller did you use for the throttle (NJoy32?)?

Afaik, none of the FC3 aircraft are going to get an ASM any time soon. It would require a complex development process, access to specific data and authorization to include such systems in a public simulation/game (especially for the russian aircraft). Belsimtek was considering a DCS F-15C for a time so there's an infinitesimal hope for this one ;)

No. Depending on the WWII flight controls success (Gladiator, Gunfighter and more), VKB will be able to produce a new modern fighter jet HOTAS, but we'll have to wait.

Cracked internal cables (throttle) Here's a quick report about an issue with my throttle (almost two years old). A few months ago some buttons started to be unresponsive with the throttle handle in the middle position. Just recently, I noticed another issue with the dual throttle behavior: (black: left throttle, red: right throttle, x: time, y: axis input 0 to 100%) When I push the left handle (only) it also sends some right throttle input. The dual throttle became unusable independently. Here's why: The cables feel harder to the touch, compared to another area (same cables). I had to cut the cracked cables and I soldered some new cables borrowed from a spare RJ45 cable to repair the throttle. I'm not sure how long it will last, but the throttle behavior is back to normal. I live in a tropical climate so it might have helped the plastics to age faster and fail sooner. So if you experience some weird throttle or buttons responses, you could take a look at the innards. There's a chance it's a simple cable issue.

It's hard to tell if it would seem interesting to replace your X55 because if there are several reports about similar issues, some users are apparently satisfied with their unit. From what I've read and asked (fellow users here and there) the quality and reliability is inconsistent. For example, my metallic encoder on the throttle (the one on the handle) does not rotate freely all the way. It rubs significantly for a part of the 360° rotation - not reliable at all in my book (since day one). I have a friend with a button on the throttle that stopped working a few days after he took his X55 out of the box. I don't have that problem. Depending and what you can afford and what you expect for your flight sim controls, I'd suggest buying a reliable throttle and avoid Saitek/MadCatz at all cost.

Thanks guys! Looks like I have some fun training to schedule ASAP. At least one of the Raytheon's videos shows a nice tight maneuver using a full asymmetric thrust, indeed. [ame=https://vimeo.com/100032618]>>> here @ 7'28" <<<[/ame] check @ 7'28" I'm not sure how I could manage to use that in ACM but it's probably worth the fun anyway.

Hi there, As I couldn't find any relevant information with a quick search in the forums and the internet, I'd like to know if someone could provide some advice/suggestions about how to use the engines thrust independently? I'm using a Saitek/MadCatz X55 dual throttle and I rarely use the thrust "decoupled". I found it useful in these rare occasions: parking/taxiing (faster turns) EFTO training emergency procedures training (like trying to avoid fire occurrences or in-flight engine failure/damage) (mostly just shutting down one engine) having fun with dangerous aerobatics and near-crash experiences ;) I know it could also be used in desperate situations if you loose the flight controls to induce some pitiful yaw and roll - but I doubt I'd use that any time soon. Any insight and/or silly ideas are very welcome. Thanks!

Thanks a lot for all the info Sokol1_br! Especially for the internal view. I'm surprised the mechanism is so simple and using a classic potentiometer. Apparently, we'll have to wait until May the 4th to know if Thrustmaster has something interesting (F/A-18 Hall effect throttle? ;) ).

I don't think there's any Hall sensor mod for the CH Throttle, so yes, it would be for a new throttle (and with a higher axis resolution) ;) Not that the CH Throttle is a bad one. It's probably one of the most reliable offer available today. But the design is outdated (low resolution, no dual throttle, no rotaries, etc.). If you manage to fix your issue you may very well use that throttle for years.

I don't own a CH Throttle Pro but as I was interested in buying one, I read a bunch of feedback and issues posts here and there. There are several reports of spiking issues with the Z-axis ( ). Afaik the CH Throttle Pro uses a linear potentiometer combined with a 8-bit resolution output/processing (=256 values, that's a rather low resolution). You could probably try to clean up the potentiometer (with that kind of products, if the potentiometer is accessible) and then recalibrate the axis. The very last option would be to replace the faulty potentiometer and CH should be able to help you. Of course, it's just an assumption, so actual CH Throttle owners should be way more precise and useful ;) One thing for sure: I'd suggest exclusively going for contact-less sensors in the future (Hall effect or magnetoresistive).

^ because I'd just love to fly way way more! An efficient and reliable controller is a key component when it comes to flying, even in a simulator and that's precisely what VKB is providing (and ED offers a top-notch simulation - they should marry).

Are you sure about that? :megalol: Everything is in place and envisioned to offer that modular control system. The Black Box (key component - controller hub) is almost there, and that's very positive. If the Gunfighter does not have any additional controls like the Fat Black Mamba, it's for a very good reason. Throttle ;) The Fat Black Mamba was an improved version of the Fat King Cobra: And it was designed as (and derived from) a desktop controller used without a throttle. I can only think how exhilarating it would be to pilot the improved Su-33 and F/A-18 with a complete VKB HOTAS (even using a F/A-18 compatible grip, the Warthog grip, and obviously the VKB grip inspired from a modern russian flight stick). In the meantime, I'll get the Black Box and the Gladiator :D …but I probably should buy more free time first :music_whistling:

Spotted on CheckSix (main french sim community website):

Thanks for the info Sokol :thumbsup:

Ok, now I need an extender. Thanks for that contagious feedback rrohde! I'm glad you finally couldn't wait to test the extender. The increased precision and general feeling is well worth the effort apparently. It was already a great pleasure to fly the Ka-50 with a side-stick configuration and the MkIII gimbal, so I can only imagine how smooth and accurate it should be with that extender now that you've given us a glimpse of the center-stick experience. Also for those who don't own a Black Mamba, keep in mind the Gunfighter will still be compatible with the Warthog grip. I'm now also considering buying one to use that excellent grip with my BM. And from what I've seen, Thrustmaster is about to reveal some new products this month (for their 25th anniversary, April 18, in NY). I can't wait to use a fully modern HOTAS with the upcoming naval operations ED is cooking… And btw, I can only agree with rrohde about the gimbal and the BM ;) Top-notch gear!

Congratz and thanks for the pictures, rrohde! (the CH Fighterstick comparison shot is very welcome) Once you'll have some flight hours with that beast, please tell us what you think about the axes progressive resistance. I'm particularly interested in the feeling with the extender, specifically for piloting the helos. I'm also curious about the movement range with the extender (both axis). I'm guessing the top of the stick would move in a rough 50 cm / 20 inches diameter circle area… At least, you'll be able to answer that when you get that interesting Obutto. I'm using the stiffest spring on the pitch axis with the soft center cam (on my BM MkIII) and I really like the feeling with the Su-27. I kept an asymmetrical configuration as I also use the hard center cam and a weaker spring on the roll axis. Imo it's a good match (at least for me), as the Su-27 is longitudinally unstable and requires a careful control on that axis. I also have more force pushing and pulling the stick (used as a side-stick) (so more resistance on the pitch axis feel rather natural) - but it might be a personal preference of course. The ability to customize the flight stick feeling is an amazing feature! I wish you (and the furry copilot) many lovely flight hours with that great flight stick!

T-Rudder MkIII / MkIV comparison Here are the T-Rudder MkIV improvements, compared to the MkIII. More comfortable heel pads allowing different feet positions. New size adjustment system and modified T-Rudder "feet" profiles, less prone to dust, with new rubber pads providing an improved grip. Reinforced centering mechanism with dual ball bearings and a thicker base plate (4 mm) for an improved robustness. Reinforced pedals axes frame. Improved pedals locking system preventing loosening or rotating the cylindrical part. External access to the tension mechanism allowing to release the cam for easier disassembly. Reinforced and visible spring force attach point (normal and high tension force). As the heel pads (in green color) are the most obvious improvement, the parts in orange color are reinforced and improved to endure even more wear, force, and flight hours. The parts in yellow are new. The new "feet" profiles in particular are less prone to dust and use new rubber pads for an improved grip on different surfaces. The base plate of the mechanism has also been reinforced with an increased thickness (4 mm). Sokol has already posted the bottom view showing the new size adjustment system (easier to adjust: loosen, slide, tighten the screws): (@rrohde: feel free to add these details in the OP if it can be useful)

That website is mostly dedicated to the Russian market (orders for Europe should be possible but the shipping costs will probably be significant). Don't worry, as soon as the products become available to Europe and North America you'll be able to order the T-Rudder. I'd suggest you send a message to FSC Europe and ask for a pre-order, or directly contact VKB in english (sales_en at vkb-sim dot pro).

Afaik, connecting the T-Rudder to the Black Mamba is not possible. Iirc, that BUS port was designed for the Throttle Box (no longer available) (it's not a RJ-45 connector).

I just got my UTC today and it's a great device! Just like a professional product! Battery pre-charged and ready to use. I chose the 650 mAH and here's how it looks on a Logitech G930 (attached w/ velcro). That should give an idea about its size. Needless to say I'm really happy with it. It's beautifully crafted with no visible seam. The discreet LED goes from red (charging) to green. I entered the specific dimensions in OpenTrack and just used my existing profile. The LEDs emitting angles are also impressive. I'd break my neck before my PS3Eye looses the signal (I can turn my head 90° L/R). I also "stress-tested" the LEDs power by reducing OT point extraction size down to 1 pixel and tried the emitter about 2 meters away from the cam. The signal was perfectly stable. HAV warned me about the paint and he told me he's already working on an improved version, but I'm perfectly satisfied with the current model :smilewink: Of course I'll have to test it many more hours to see how it can endure numerous flights and probably some crashes on the floor, but for now: it's all good and I recommend it. Being equipped with an fully-wireless headset+tracking device provides a formidable comfort. Congratz HAV! And thanks a million for offering such a great product! [it might be a tiny detail, but I also like that the emitter is ON with the switch pushed to the front of the device (just like the aircraft toggle switches)]