Ktulu2

Look...I've watched the tacView, I dropped flares (more intense yellow). R27 & 77 arent 120s...they are much ******. The missile that does into a mountain was stalled out. Finally you didnt exploade, I did. At this point I don't get how come watching tacView is so hard for you.

Hmmm...glad you figured how to use tacView @ 50% 1) engagement one, I DO FLARE...TWICE 2)No, R77 and R27 and AIM120 DO NOT have the same values. 3) Putting a hill between a missile and its target does have a tendency to make guidance difficult. Plus I flared, so when I recomitted, the missile wasn't looking at the right place. 4)The R77 hit me at 103931, tacVIew can be weird for that.

In the 1st engagement, the 3rd aim-120 I fired hit you and the 29 simply ate it, than the aim-9 got you. Yes you can outrun missiles in this game, especially MRM, simply had lost my speed escaping those nasty R73s.

Well... I guess I didn't expect him to spam everything at the end. I did expect R73s, and defeated those and was left too slow to evade the R77. I also pressed longer than I would usually seeing how he had ''defeated'' 3 120s at that point. Good old 29 tank lol.

Ok... 1)simply look on the top you have plane selection (the only thing you can click on to have a list of planes) Not sure if this is genuine or just not trying enough. 2) the AIM-120 DOES NOT make smoke IRL! The R-27 DOES! This is a simulation, if you want a fair&balanced game unlike real life go play hawx or something. 3) Please don't turn the thread into a missile complain one, already so many out there.

Je sais que si tu n'attends pas assez avant de décoller (3-4min) la boussole n'a pas le temps de s'alligner correctement et cause le même problème.

I agree with Frostie. You should have been using radar there, I wouldn't have seen you ''more'' if you had it on. Probably keep EOS for sneaking up behind people/ post-merge. Not for head-on engagements where the enemy clearly has you.

Download tacView, than simply double click on it

https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aq_lEjzv-AgjgTlQ_TLOstPQVkK8 I have confirmation it works

Ok : First engagement with you : We went down the merge after you tanked your way out of an aim120 ;), I cannot know when you tried going EOS in that. 2cd fight : You simply never really seemed offensive... 3rd fight : We got down to 4NM at significant altitude difference, I guess its just EOS usage... I said we didnt close to 10NM as I started shooting and decomiting at that point, you stayed commited to close longer Link to tacView : https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aq_lEjzv-AgjgTlQ_TLOstPQVkK8

The range has a big effect, just as much as for radar (light waves, whatever the leght, loose their energy at the same distance rate). The fact I wasn't on burner lowers that initial intensity, thus reducing GREATLY the range of detection. Currently looking at tacview, will upload it shortly

As I said, we were at around 10NM I think and I was out of burner, so it does not seem crazy that you didn't see me. That is for the second time, the first, I simply can't remember to be honest. I could go watch the footage I recorded/maybe try to get a track, but that is if I have the time.

R73 hits 100% if you are not in Rmin OR out of burners at the moment of launch. If you are at risk, either pop preventive flares or risk lowering RPM momentarily. This being said, keep in mind that if the flaker is loaded he'll be limited in the amount of G he can pull otherwise he'll turn into multiple flying objects...

Are you sure about 600 fpm? Assuming this means 600 feet per min thats 6 Knots... Is that in FPS or Vertical speed?

Hmm...What kind of lodout do you guys have? I can't remember having any trouble with the F-15, Although most of the time I land I'm near being winchester and with at most 3000LBS. Are you guys landing with three full bags? Or are you guys touching down at 250 KTS?

Take an arduino (I ordered a bunch for 3CAD each not long ago... DIRT CHEAP, can't say about the quality though, didnt get them yet : http://fr.aliexpress.com/?spm=2114.06010108.1000002.1.VESxPK ) Once you have an arduino just upload one of the many codes that render a given board into an independant joystick controller. Note that some of these codes might require a specific board, so watch out for that.

Well I think if we start equipping planes for fairness we should call the sim DC, as the simulator part sure takes a hit...

You ask the closest SR-71 to ram it :music_whistling:

Well...Active VS Active is a lot of fun too... The thing is that at the time I'm guessing FC3 planes are (1996 for AIM-120C) Russia was in the first stages of the R-77...Wish we could make every plane a bit yougner and have 27SM and Data-link on the 15.

During training pilots will get a red tick if they go above a certain engine RPM on the ground, as the instructor in the other seat will see it.

And here starts the talk about FCS : Aim-4 Combat Simulator

Isn't the 27 ALREADY shortened?

Ah so you mean shooting maddogs. To be honest, the only time I do this is when someone notches me at the moment I shoot...I sincerely believe these shots are easy to evade and shouldn't be dangerous if you have your ennemy on radar.

Ammo unlimited in DCS options/missions options. If its not ammo its something like that

I was sure quebekers in DCS were an engendered specie. Great to see there's more than two or three!