Jump to content

SDsc0rch

Members
  • Posts

    1594
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by SDsc0rch

  1. i am not joking - i am saying that is what it is WORTH - that's what i would pay for it hegykc has to make a business decision and set a price that will make it worth it for him to do this --- he can't price it at $10,000 or he won't sell any - and he can't go out of business just so precious little intruder505 can have one for 45cents he's going to have to find a sweet spot where he maximizes both sales and profit
  2. i've noticed this since 1.5.0 there is some extraneous HUD symbology that clutters the lower left-hand corner while banked normal symbology while straight-and-level thx! : )
  3. nope - 350KIAS is the "sweet spot" for the eagle >350kts the eagle gets "twitchy" in roll - less than that and the engines have slower response time --- both not good when you're on the boom you fly fingertip (ie.. "tight") at 350kts ---- fingertip is used around the airfield, parade and for weather penetration
  4. Ah yes! and for the fighter tanker, higher and faster 300 - 350kts indicated airspeed at 30k (yes, that means groundspeed will be pretty high) thx
  5. well i certainly hope SOMEONE has the [nevermind] to build a viper for DCS! BMS or no BMS, DCS needs it because it is so pervasive, capable and...... "fun" and it would sell like nothing else - mark my words i agree, the bar has been set - and any dev taking up the challenge would have their work cut out for them (because for sure comparisons would be made) - but for petes sake, the dev who DOES stand up? my goodness would they be handsomely rewarded maybe no dev would do it - maybe only ED would be qualified to take on such a project...... ??
  6. adding a 117 would *necessitate* re-engineering the radar model just like they've made a "PFM" for the flight model - bring up the level of fidelity i think that would be a good thing
  7. i don't think any aircraft is "out" at all i think it has more to do with complexity and time required to build these modules yes, i think there should be a priority on mainstream (strike eagle, viper, DCS-level eagle, current russian jets..) - but i also think important aircraft (like the F-117) have a place in the DCS stable eventually
  8. know what i want? i would really like a... "digital" "combat" "simulation" seems like we're not modeling current-day modern air combat - seems like the platforms being built in to DCS is around the 90s-era right when the F-117 was operational the f-117 was around and was part of military planners' order of battle, therefore it would really be great if it was in DCS ED should be doing everything in its power to simulate air combat - in whatever timeframe they choose
  9. ^^what mike said! +1
  10. oh! so you're saying if you are placing an a/c on the map, the list of available spots will be based on that type of aircraft? interesting... the spots i've shown are for the eagle only
  11. haha! me too - this will save you time also, you can see where you can park - ED enabled some spots, and not others...
  12. when you place an aircraft on the map and you designate it to start the mission on the ramp, it is assigned a parking spot on the airfield... but.. there are a lot of spots! how do you know where on the airfield you will end up by selecting a number in the dropdown list? well, here you go... south-west ramps: east and north-east: north: west ramp (fighters): west ramp (heavies): so there you go! you have no excuse now 8) ps.. i just named these ramps based on their relative location, if they're actually called something else, let me know i'll change it
  13. i would *love* it! 8) == ps.. mike, can't rep you - but you hit the nail on the head!
  14. sweeper......! don't stir the pot!!
  15. we're hoping... crossing our fingers... wishing in wishing wells... watching for falling stars ----- mayyyyybe someday (we're praying!)
  16. Fully functional F-15 possible? one can only pray..................
  17. i don't understand why someone logging in all the way over >>>>>>> "there" across the map, that i can't even SEE, should affect the framerates on my computer cmon leatherneck
  18. i'm just curious if this update fixes the problem where everybody else on the server suffers lag/stutters/loss-of-FR/etc (and yay IMPACTS WITH TERRAIN if they're down low!) whenever someone jumps in a mig-21 does anyone know?
  19. *sigh* yes - and I really wish they would reconsider it other servers don't restrict tacview and cheating isn't rampant in fact, I don't recall seeing a single instance of cheating
  20. TL: DR -- for easy kills, log on during the "more quieter periods" 8)
  21. except when the eagle is at 50k ft and M1.4 then, the eagle just looks right down in to that valley and rolls inverted, goes idle to IRCM and foxes on you from 20nm and you can't shoot back
  22. *cough*datalink*cough*
  23. pfft! $500 worth it
×
×
  • Create New...