Vitormouraa

You were talking about LGBs... as far as I can remember. Which I showed it's possible, even the wiring is compatible. I was aware of the fact that the BRU-55 was supposed to be the 'smart rack', i.e it was the only VER rack capable of employing JDAMs. We weren't sure about that.

It sure is. Despite all the things that it broke, it's a good patch. Hopefully ED will fix them soon.

He used to be a tester actually. :) It sure looks nice.

I think it's easier to say what's not in the game than saying what is in the game. If that makes any sense :D

All the Huey skins must go to: C:\Program Files\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\Bazar\Liveries\uh-1h If you're not using OpenBeta, it should be DCS World only.

Yeah I am aware of that. I wasn't sure about the necessary wiring. Thanks! So no JDAMs on BRU-33.

Yes... it's been a while already. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3285514&postcount=13 It's not clear yet if we will be able to mount the JDAMs on the BRU-33. LGBs and others? yes.

:megalol:

Yeah awesome!

They changed the A-10C cockpit a bit, the blacks at least.

Very cool! Thanks for doing this. :) He seems to be a huge fan of props. Mosquito or a P-38 would be a dream!

Then I don't know what spring is. :megalol: Sun is burning you at all times here :D

Awesome!

CA has indeed a lot of potential as someone already pointed out. NineLine said he will be working on it with ED. I'm looking forward to future updates and general improvements. JTAC and Co-op missions are a lot of fun with friends.

Agreed. Viper sounds much better for sure. Btw, nice signature!

Keep in mind that the pilot was using around 30 to 40% of speed brake. That increases roll rate. Especially at 300 KIAS or above. As well as the missing pylons and low amount of fuel which means less inertial and a greater aileron response. That perfectly matches the A-10 agility in DCS.

:megalol: Yeah a track would be nice.

Viper is just a nickname that the pilots gave to the F-16. They didn't like Fighting Falcon at all :D Same thing at the end of the day...

What's your altitude and temperature?

Not necessarily, exactly, when they were being deployed. But introduced into the A-10C.

Oh yeah, I remember that thread. I posted some comments in it too, I was curious about it as well. But learning a bit more about turbine engines I have to say that the evidences that Yo-Yo pointed out are very solid. He even provided some stuff from GE. The A-10C in DCS also got an increase of 10% in terms of Indicated airspeed couple of months ago. Although it's not official, I have confirmed with a few buddies of mine. Including the 476th vFG. ITT is still the same, however. I am not sure if this was intentional or not. But last time I checked, no one was able to prove that the DCS: A-10C was underperforming in the thrust segment.

That would be for another topic. But while we are at it; Do you have enough documentation to prove it has issues? If you do, I truly you recommend posting all that here. I'd love to take a look at it. I always look forward when someone brings this up. As long as they can explain what's wrong of course :) It doesn't necessarily mean it'll get fixed anytime soon though...

USAF page provides you the installed thrust, the A-10C manual (The USAF one) provides you the installed thrust. Which is 8,900 lbf. --

There is nothing wrong about that value. It's called installed thrust. Engines lose a bit of thrust when they are installed on the airframe. I explain a bit this behavior here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3404789&postcount=46

IMHO this is the best way to identify an A-10. Whether it's a Charlie model or an Alpha. You could say the Missile Warning System (MWS) on the wingtip and tail, but there were A-10Cs without them too. But in case you see them, that's an A-10C for sure. An A-10 carrying a TGP doesn't mean it's a Charlie model either, there were A-10As+ carrying the LITENING Pod on the Station 3 and 9. The Pave Penny was removed around the time when they were introducing the Suite 7.