Ce_Zeta

Things change...world is moving, it's not static. Some people don't understand this fact very well. :D In FB they said that when they tested his Desktop HOTAS they will start to sell to simmers...At US$2,800 each F-16 HOTAS. We are talking about his future plans (previos plan was started to sell F-16 HOTAS in 2015...so delays are not exclusive of ED :D ). As I said for home cockpits can be an interesting choice...Again, in the future.:joystick:

Yeap, the company was founded in 2004 and in 2015 they started to develop Desktop HOTAS. At this moment they don't sell for consumer market....Don't expect a Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS, This is for very high end sim consumers...it is an option.

I discovered Bugeye HOTAS and looks amazing. The target of the company are high end Simmers and desktop military market. At this moment, they had a portfolio comprised by 2 desktop HOTAS: F-16 HOTAS AFAIK they are testing a first batch with military users in order to obtain a polished product. First prototypes of this HOTAS was unveiled in march 2016. As they said in FB page, this low cost HOTAS will cost US$2,800. Military standard Quality and All switches can be mapped, USB 2.0 compatible. More info: http://www.f-16grips.com/ F-16 Desktop HOTAS product webpage Bugeye Facebook page. F-35 HOTAS Released in September 2016. No more info is available ATM. F-35 Desktop HOTAS product webpage They are no rival for Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog and CH HOTAS but for Very High-End simmers can be an interesting option. Others can only praise for lowering manufacturing cost in the future. Until then Warthog and CH will continue to be the mainstay of High-End HOTAS.

The EE version modeled will have AN/ALE-40 Chaff and flares dispenser? (Added in 1992 aprox.)

Our you can buy a CH Products FighterStick/Combat Stick, a Pro throttle and Pro pedals.

Thank you very much Capitán Zeen.

Plz, No more soviet aircrafts from Leatherneck. We want F-14, F-15....Swedish fighters...Tornado ADV and IDS... Soviet fighters must be made by BST and ED.

Fantastic skin Trueno!

Some names for the module if the original is not allowed: Po 105 ATH PAH-1 (Polychop Antitank Helicopter) Do you have in mind, modelling the BO105ATH version?The spanish version looks similar (or identical, I need to check my sources) to the german PAH-1 original. HOT missile launcher in line,andAPX 397 day sight. 28 of these choppers where delivered by CASA from 1979 to 1984. Thanks.

I supposed that you are creating an AJS-37. Any aircraft have his strong points and his weakness. We cannot change the reality, we musn't change it. Now you don't like the loadouts, maybe tomorrow you are not satisfied with the aircraft performance and in a week you started to think that can be cool if the Viggen has a twin tail, two engines...or something else.

Thank you very much Nicholas.:thumbup:

Yeap, me too. Please upload it to Google Drive or similar....With a download speed of 40 KB/s....it's impossible to download the template.

It's the standard in International comms only. So it's not a reason for have an english cockpit. But I agree wth you in the topic. There are english, spanish, chinese...Hip cockpits, it's an option for the operator.

Yeah, I know, but remember "it's not the opinion that breaks the rules, its the delivery of that opinion".:thumbup:

Ya está disponible por aqui. (Lamentablemente, en pleno siglo XXI seguimos teniendo la lacra de la censura, he tenido que redireccionar este enlace a un mensaje del foro del E69 que SI os llevará al sitio de descarga. Y es que el sitio de descarga está censurado en estos foros).

What a beauty!

I agree.

Con el Simulador ya viene un esquema bastante aceptable del 801 escuadrón como fue a Afganistán. Tanto Lipe como Famet Virtual han pintado esquemas para el Hip con los colores de las FAMET. Faltaba el estimado SAR que tan vital labor realiza allende los mares. Casi acabado:

For understand what's happens in the World, you should listen Radio America...I mean, read SimHQ :music_whistling::D

Maybe, Using the same RSBN code than ED because both are RSBN-4 system?

Great question.

I agree. Fantastic idea!!!!

Thank you very much AlphaOneSix!

Fantastic news JO!

BlackLion213, Yeaah, all the pictures you posted desmostrate that 2 aircrafts can fly in formation. But the real thing is, without proper equipment, they cannot operate in the same strike package. What's the diference between MiG-29A of the Luftstreitkräfte and MiG-29G of the Luftwaffe? Or between a Croatian MiG-21 BisD and a Romanian MiG-21 Bis (no Lancer)? NATO interoperability. Radios and IFF, VOR/TACAN in the technology side. Without a minimum equipment (and procedures) any non NATO aircraft cannot interoperate with NATO systems. Greek SAM S-300s operate outside NATO network for example. We suspected that ;) when we went deep in the Fishbed's avionics. If you check other modules, you will see that they are coding simulation modules. *Simulator= A software which imitates the operation of a real-world process or system over time. It's a matter of common sense. ;)