amalahama

Thanks Viper!!! That relieves me! Regards!

Who is being unpolite now? And seriously, do you think that a simulator is more or less realistic according to 3D models fidelity? Then BMS should be the more arcadish simulator in the world http://www.simhq.com/_air14/images/air_507a_019.jpg Regards!

Oh yeah, that bothers me so much... I can't stand it! I will never fly A-10C again until a new E-3 3D model is done (newer than the newest, I mean), with corrected size. It's a such impact to gameplay!! I want my 50 bucks back please! (Ironic mode off) Regards!!

Don't panic, but... I've found CBU-97 behaviour a little weird in the video. It looks like BLU-108 dispensers directly impact on the ground instead of smaller skeets. No BLU-108 spin either. It seems a regular cluster bomb, with less (even more powerful) submunitions, but without any guide. It might be AI only uses a simplify model for this weapon, I don't know... We'll clarify everything in a bunch of days (I hope!) Regards!

Oh great!!! I've been in a cave the last two months, sorry. Soooo... no anouncement so far I'm afraid, right? When is the next deadline? Maybe when Nevada is released? Regards!

A-10C box version is about to be delivered in the incoming weeks. Does it mean next DCS module name will be unveiled as well?

Mehh come on, is it really so difficult to implement? :( FS2004 already brought it with stock aircrafts.. On another topic, I have always dreamed with decoupling rudder control from trimming. I know it's not very realistic, but since our plastic rudders doesn't have any FFB control to recenter the pedals either, I can live with this realism concession. It'd help a lot to not hate the trimming system. I know it can be considered as "feature", but it's been working on? as an option or whatever? Regards!

Great! Thanks for the response, Viper Regards!

Can a GBU be guided by another buddy with TGP while dropped from an A-10 without TGP? Regards!

It's not a real big issue, but it'd be a nice feature. It would solve some of the problems with mislocation between map and 3D world. And it'd get more important if *wink* the next DCS module *wink* is based on a naval aircraft with A-G radar, able to execute low-level antiship missions. Regards!

Are you talking about Nevada or Caucasus? Current (DCS) world is flat, have a look at this: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1279727&postcount=23 Regards!

Will feature EDGE a round world, or it will be still flat? Regards!

-INS alignenement and drift correctly modelled -Nothing else really, it'd be cool a deeper modellization of AN/ARC-164 UHF Radio and introduce some functionality in KY-58 and IFF panel, but it's enough what we have now. Regards!

Watching this at 360p is a sacrilege!!! Is there a 720p (or 1080p) version out there? Regards!

Bravo, you have summarized in only 6 words the A-10C 'raison d'être' both in the sim and real life! Regards!

It could be a nice neat graphic addition and realistic too! Some flight simulators are working now implementing this, for example X-plane: Also Outerra has worked in the topic before: More info: http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems2/gpugems2_chapter16.html Regards!

When HOT numbers are flashing and you press the key "ENTER" in the UFC, yes, then you confirm the flashing values. But I'm not talking about that. What intrigues me is if you press ENTER key alone, not entering in HOT elevation change mode, then two figures appear in the middle of the HUD. As you noted before, first is the altitude error between CADC and real MSL; second is the real MSL. Right. But then it seems either I don't follow the procedure correctly or this feature is broken now in DCS: In 1.1.0.9, both numbers are 0. In previous patches, this values contained some figures, I'm not sure whether they were correct or not though. Something should be broken here. If you press again ENTER, both values should be transferred to DELTA CAL in IFCC TEST. I've tested that in previous patches, when some nubers appeared on the HUD, but the DELTA value never passed to the IFCC after the second press. I turned IFCC to TEST mode and check, but still all numbers were 0. Regards!

Hi! I've some questions to avionics gurus :) In theory, when I press ENTER in the UFC panel, that should enter an target elevation update for the current steerpoint. That is what the manual say. But what does it mean? In the HUD two values come up: 0D and 0G. Before patch 9 these values always were some "random" numbers, now always show 0. Why? Which changes have been done? And what do these values mean? I have the feeling that ALT SCE switch, this elevation update procedure and DELTA CAL in HUD TEST mode are linked to each other somehow... Regards!

Wow you have a treasure there!!! EGI and LASTE will be indeed interesting infromation to go through. Is there any way to get you over your laziness?? :P Regards

It's true, right now in DCS:A-10 pitch commands are performed by trim tabs. But this behaviour doesn't seem to be right. In A-10A Flight manual is stated that control stick is directly linked to elevator actuators and only aileron tabs are linked to the stick. But again, I don't know if it's the same in the A-10C. Although I see quite doubtful that they have changed such fundamental backup system. Still waiting to PalkrII, yo-yo or others to clarify :) Regards!

3) Please go in to more detail about the problem - what it should do but isn't doing. Well, basically when you make a new flightplan inside the simulator,VNAV refuse to work, ABRIS won't calculate your top of climb etc. You can argue that it works with the standard flight plan as it has been made up in the mission editor, but it must be seen as a bug, since it's not the way the real thing works. I don't think it has a easy workaround though. Regards!

Oh yes you're right, sorry. I misunderstood the PITCH MRFCS text. Maybe manual reversion mode has changed in the -C and now elevator tabs are directly controlled by the stick? Who knows? :dunno: Regards!

I think you're not right. I checked yesterday the A10A-1 and it's said that pitch commands in MRFCS mode are directly linked to stabilizator trim tabs. The only direct link is to the rudders. Regards!

1) ABRIS Database save and load functions don't work properly http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=48470 2) Amp-meter and Volt-meter don't work. Batteries have an unlimited life 3) I never had any success getting ABRIS VNAV to work. And it seems I am not alone: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=36486 Regards!

+100! INS drift would be a great adition and then INS updates will make sense. I found other issues in ABRIS as well, but I don't remember ATM... I will again dig in the next days to try if I'm able to find them out. Regards!