MrDieing

ED are doing the Nimitz class with the Roosevelt sub-class, so they are including skins for Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71), Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72), George Washington (CVN-73), John C. Stennis (CVN-74), and the Harry S. Truman (CVN-75). Model will be the same, textures will be different. Heatblur is developing the Forrestal class on its own, but I remember them saying they are working with ED on this, presumeably to include their carrier deck crew and all the others nice things they are developing with this Carrier Module. Heatblur however have said that it will be free for those who have the F-14. Not sure if they will put it on sale seperatly like ED's Supercarrier Module.

Wags said that there will be a Hornet/Carrier bundle. Tomcat/Carrier bundle depends on Heatblur, nothing announced so far. Heatblur are also developing their own Forrestal-class Carrier, presumeably with the same deck crew features etc. as the Nimitz class that ED does. Yes, this should not be a problem.

As far as I understood it wind correction through LASTE is only relevant for dropping dumb bombs in CCIP. Guided weapons guide to a certain point anyway, correcting for wind themselves.

As have I :thumbup:

This is a prime example of how to not report a 'bug'.

This also allows them to deploy their 2000D's more efficiently. You can do with one designating platform just fine anyway in a CAS situation.

I too remember this feature being more or less confirmed in the past. Cant remember if it was for the payware of freeware though.

I heard something about this as well. Not sure what it is all about though?

Hello folks, Im looking for a new rig. Im wondering what is better for DCS; the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X or something from Intel e.g. i7 7700k? Im looking to get either a RTX2060 or RTX2070 to go with it. As for RAM I'll stick with 16gb DDR4 but if someone recommends 32 then I might look into that aswell.

So what is this supposed to be? An actual bug report or a rant that the Hornet radar is too bad according to your 'feelings'? Can you be more specific?

This is probably one of the most used wrong statements on this entire forum.

Thank you for your detailed explanation :thumbup:

Forgive my ignorance, but what is IADS?

What makes you think that?

No, too classified according to ED.

This :megalol: I buy almost everything to support ED. I don't need anything in exchange for that in terms of discounts etc. The software that I get for my money more then satisfies me :)

RAZBAM has confirmed that the team that worked on the MiG-19 will work on the MiG-23 after its done. Looking at complexity, available coders in their team, I'd put my money on the Flogger before the Mudhen aswell.

As far as I can see the only people here that are whining are the ones that want the unrealistic option to control the LANTIRN from the front seat.

Its funny. People bitch for multi crew when there is none available. People bitch for single crew when there is multi crew available. Accept things as they are for once maybe.

Are you guys seriously expecting there is a line on the changelog that says: 50% improvement on VR performance. I would never put that in a changelog if I was ED because somebody will probably complain that he only gets a 49% improvement.

My gosh calm down.

Take a breath, and just leave.

Some new screenshots.

I am well aware most (I assume USAF) pilots call it the Viper. Its however an unofficial nickname that has been used so much that people seem to think its the official name, while its really not. As someone on the previous page said, I won't sleep loose over it, its just something that seems off and I was wondering if more people felt this way.

There is nothing wrong with Viper. Just the combination of F-16C Viper that feels unnatural to me. Fair points on the Hog though. Not sure what ED's decision-making or policy on this is.