MrDieing

Please tell us what you did, otherwise it is impossible for us to know what went wrong.

Yes, the Mirage was supposed to be overhauled and the Harrier finished by the end of the year, but the MiG-19 was also supposed to release this year. I suppose that last one cost them more resources then they thought in the first place, thus pushing back pretty much everything since they only have two systems coders AFAIK. Expect the M2K and Harrier to be up for a nice upgrade right after the Mig-19 drops, Im pretty sure they are already doing stuff for it on the sidelines and maybe already full time as the Mig enters its finishing up state as far as features and systems go.

They are probably trying to make a picture of small pieces of info, its not a guarantee that they take ingredient A from the RDY radar and ingredient B from the RDI radar and melt it together in what is the current radar. If for example you see somewhere an article about a new radar being able to do this or that, then you could assume that the previous version works in a similar fashion but maybe not as good. Hope you understand what I am trying to say :)

No

You might want to go see a doctor..

I have no idea what he is talking about. Somebody enlighten me? Sounds to me somebody needs to grow up.

Cant know what you are doing wrong if you dont tell us what you are doing exactly, I cant find my glass sphere.

I'll make a little more direct quote https://www.facebook.com/plugins/comment_embed.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Feagle.dynamics%2Fposts%2F10161325430090341%3Fcomment_id%3D10161325863840341%26reply_comment_id%3D10161325868870341

No C172 or 737. DCS Maps at the moment are not big enough for commercial liners and C172 would not only be useless, but also not used as military trainer. I support unarmed 'civil' aircraft, as long as they have something to do with military. Other sims have plenty enough good civil aircraft, DCS should not try to be something it was never intented to be.

I'd prefer an aircraft that was actually capable of doing something

+1 on that. Plus when you handed them over your money, you knew what you were signing up for, thats release in Winter. Im hoping for a Top Gun OST remix with Meteor for the release trailer :D

Pretty simple, its in the planned weapon list :rolleyes: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3285514&postcount=13 As for the differences, they are pretty sneaky about the HARM, but just look at it in the same way as the AMRAAM with the B, C and D version. Better performances on most aspects compared to its pre-decessor.

If I remember correctly, Cobra stated that they had to put a year in there for Steam, they wouldnt accept something as ambiguent as 'Winter', but the original statement of targeting December, guaranteeing Winter still standed. But then again, given the recent flow of PR (which is minimal) its pretty likely it will be 2019

AFAIK a module has never been released unnannounced, always there has been a week / two week / four week heads up with an exact date. If they dont announce anything before next week this day, its probably not going to be here before Christmas.

If you are not happy with RAZBAM's way of working then speak with your wallet, dont buy their next module, a lot of people would get less annoyed :)

Maybe because DECOY is busy, or because he is still getting used to his new job, or because the changes were supposed to release in an earlier update so they are in a previous changelog but only made it to this update, or because the other devs are working on more important stuff, or because they were fixed a long time ago and you only now realize, or because they were never bugs at all. And if they were bugs, be grateful they fixed it for you, and stop crying over these things. Its hard to please everyone.

Do you use Group mode on those? Because that only works on the depth axis, not the horizontal axis. If you use this mode and the ships are sailing behind each other from left to right or vice versa then both missiles fail.

Cool little story! :) Im pretty sure most people support non-combat aircraft in the way you describe, its just the world civilian that seems to trigger people.

I completely agree with you, but I think its also a matter of preference. If you do not care for A/A then you want to see them doing some PGM's, HARMS etc. If you do not care for A/G, then you want to see them do LTWS, Datalink and SA first. Essentially Hornet customers are split that way 50/50, so its a matter of throwing bones to both of them every once and a while to keep them quiet and to keep them from ranting on the forums.

My gosh what a massive book you wrote down here, do you have a TL DR version? :D Anyway, welcome back :)

Sometimes this is the case, even though a hand appears. Something with website design etc. I disagree, I think the bugtracker gives plenty information. You also easily take a look in the bug section yourself and you will probably find all bugs on the first or second page.

Personally I find VR highly overrated. TrackIR will do perfectly fine if you are looking to step up your game.

Jeez this thread got hijacked quickly. She is a multirole, once she is complete she can do anything within your imagination.

I get where the frustration comes from, but the J-11A was added to the FC3 package, not to the Su-27 module. I get that its almost identical and I can totally see it being in there along with the standalone Su-27, but nowhere does it state you get the J-11A, except for one statement uboats made a few months back. When you purchased the Su-27 you knew you were only getting that, because nowhere it says you get the J-11A, because its in the FC3 package.

Are you pressing the correct mic switch?