Jarlerus

Viggen version confirmed? (Is it the first, or has it been before? idk) Anyways: AJS37! :D

Here's an idea: Give the task to BSK :) Then it will be done in like 2-3 years, probably :D

Are stress fractures and material fatigue modeled in DCS? 'cus 21 g's would probably make the airframe a candidate of a thorough inspection... :P

You are exactly in a state of mind that LN wants you to be ;)

It's a nice choice, but doesn't really fill the gap =) (Still putting it in though ^^ )

As I have a small dose of OCD, I have noticed something that bothers me a bit ^^ At the moment the list has a big gap between 1983 and 1988. Any suggestions on airframes (fixed wing) that entered service during that time? =)

Also, for you who wondered, this is the music in the video: https://audiojungle.net/item/80s-trailer/13615922?s_rank=1 (Posted by LN on YT) I'm content with that I know, but a bit disappointing it's not a whole track ^^

Your texture claim is debunked by Cobra, at least :P https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2930400&postcount=82

Thanks! Yeah! If it's the menu background I'd be very happy =D

For me it all boils down to game play in the end. I'd vote yes if you can manage to find interesting, entertaining and challenging tasks for it to do in DCS. Tasks that can make it fun to play in multiplayer situations as well. So; Yes, if it's mission can be replicated in a good manner. No, if you can't replicate it in a satisfying manner in DCS (yet). It's also one of those "I probably would not buy, but I'd love to fly with others that have" :)

It's all of a genre called Retro Electro. There's loads of great music of that style! :D If you want more, check the spotify list in my sign. (it has both Blood Dragon soundtrack, Hotline Miami stuff and much more) P.S., Leatherneck: I still want your trailer music -.-'

The Retro Electro is strong with that one. I don't know that exact song (It does sound familiar though...) - I'd like to know so I can add it to my Retro Electro Spotify playlist:

Only A2G radar.

Axis for gears? Just because it's controlled by a lever doesn't mean it's an axis IRL. Most gear levers I've used (in the modules I've flown) don't actually work as an axis, but as a switch with multiple positions.

I just want to add a side note that Starway has promised to update his textures for 2,5, when it comes as well. //Jarl

How did the rewrite go? And did you find a 3D modeler?

Not a full module, but still: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=163181

+1 I agree that these menus can be made much more usable.

Hear, hear!

^+1

Switzerland would, IMO, be an strange choice. making a Swedish map makes some sense, as it would have probably been a very hot spot if the cold war had turned hot. Switzerland, AFAIK, would probably have been spared in such a scenario.

Ok, so what I can see the F was probably already in service during the end of '42, so I can change it to that. :thumbup:

Excellent =) I like these kinds of responses ^^ For the P-51, I have adjusted date of entry accordingly. As for it's service life, I've left it as is, as AFAIK it's difficult to precisely know when a specific version was actually taken out of service. For the P-47, I've adjusted the version name, as the list is for the version we will get. I also just adjusted the name on the F4U, and left the service life, for the same reason as for the P-51. When it comes to the P-40F however, I'm reluctant to change the entry date. 1943 was the date I found it was actually sent into active service. I might be wrong, of course, but without any source on this I will be cautious with changing it. //Jarl

The diff. between 24V and 24P is a quite substantil one, out of a gaming perspective. Gunner in the V has more stuff to do (yay Turret!) than in the P, mainly. As for a LanceR, AFAIK it can use a targeting pod, and that surely gives it much more of a capability than the Bis, but we all know how hard that is to get documentation on (if you don't have a special deal as for the A10, AFAIK). Also that aside, the LanceR's base performance should be similar, if not same as, the Bis, no? Anyway: I think the LanceR is a special case as it's an old air frame (MiG-21) with classified systems (LITENING pod) so it's both too old (and already in the game) and too classified to be interesting for DCS.

Balance? Bah. Servers and/or missions can restrict access to hardware. No nerfs! Also, there's a lot of speculation in this thread. Let's put some faith in LNS that they will consult proper sources, simulate, and test their data so that the AIM-54 will be as close as possible to the real version. One can come a long, long way with math in these cases. Trust science! :P