aaron886

More searching will get you some results, but it's possible to add some really simple additional aircraft to FC3. They're really only just a different external model, though, so it's not going to be interesting to many people. That's the Hornet you're seeing. The Raptor might be some screenshots of a model that was put in game by a now-silent development group. (IRIS.)

This is such a great idea. Really want to see that multiplayer support, though. :) I hope some of the community pros can be of help. DCS is so sadly lacking in variety of weather!

I believe it. Not really an AMD user by choice, just can't upgrade right now. :( Thanks for the advice though, guys.

WHAT? Ugh. I don't understand computers. I'll check out that tweak, but no amount of deep scenes tweaking I've done can solve all my problems right now. I'm running a Phenom X4 965 Black at 3.4ghz. 8GB DDR3 RAM. Maybe I should learn to overclock. At this point, I'm just hoping EDGE helps offload the CPU.

What's your CPU, Mustang? I have a great card now (GTX760 4GB), but can't run scenes out at all. Annoying.

Fantastic representation for your team and virtual aerobatics! Excellent interview.

The separate chat is a great idea! I hope we can get everyone to use this page instead of the basic livestream page.

Well I can get a few. A-6A (foreground,) A-6C (fore and right,) A-5A, A-4C, F-4J, EA-1F, SH-3A, RA-3B (in black,) A-3B.

Gauges are looking fantastic, guys!

I don't think that's true, Sobek. (Your experience may outweigh mine.) Instead of having an additional set of textures for each object, valued in gigabytes, a simple heat source definition in that object's originating script file would be much more efficient. It's certainly practical, if not easy.

This. There's no cohesive changes being made to multiplayer for combat afficionados. The only growing aspect of MP that I've seen is the goof-around kind of flying. (Not that it can't be fun occasionally, too!) The DCS platform has some great potential change on the horizon, it's just not taking any direction.

To me that shows that it is in an integration/clean-up kind of phase. Good news, IMO!

Fortunately, they've kindly highlighted the inclusion of the TERRIBLE "spring-and-plate" design that makes the X-52 line such garbage for precision flying. Thanks for making sure I know to ignore this product, Saitek. Always a pleasure.

Too much rationalization. It has nothing to do with brightness, only hue.

Nevada Update: Color Issue If no one else is going to mention this, I will... These shadows look... green. It should be closer to this. Here's the problem: Top = ED Bottom = Real life Notice the completely different hue of the shadows. Compare the cloud shadows to the ground shadows in both pictures. Please fix this, ED. Basic atmospherics and lighting must be right, if nothing else.

Then what's your point, are you asking a question or trying to disprove the physics community at large, Mr. Newton?

How about you take the day off? :doh:

Cloud computing?

Nice work! Fast cuts often look forced in flight sim videos, this didn't. Not getting that vibe at all. Looks like it isn't even adjusted.

Sideslip as shown by a traditional instrument is a measure of lateral acceleration. Sideslip in aerodynamic terms is the lateral component of the difference between the aircraft's longitudinal axis and its direction of travel.

You have to fly, first. :D

Excellent work, thank you!

Well I don't intend to respond to a veiled demand for results. ;)

I think it should be possible.

Wow! High quality, well-composed... awesome.