Mr_sukebe

Just to clarify, you weren’t impressed?

if you don’t genuinely know whether it makes a difference, why bother commenting? It just adds noise. There’s plenty of other threads that include user experiences of using wifi

??? Just like the Q3 and similar, the AVP can stream using wifi. DFR is basically dependent on eye tracking, which the AVP has and to say that Apple units have zero ability to be used for gaming is simply wrong.

Sounds like it's already close. Who's going to post the first video with the AVP of DCS?

I watched video this week on YouTube where they showed RAF testing of one of the 30mm 108s. A single hit on the rear of a Spitfire didn't actually take the tail off, but that's because it was on the ground. In flight and with additional forces on it, chances are that the tail would have fallen off. They also had stats for a comparison against a B17. Apparently the average was x4 30mm hits to "on average" take down a B17, or x20 20mm cannon founds from say a 190 to take down a B17.

Chances are that someone will create a hack to allow use of the AVP as a PCVR. Of course the question after that will be whether our GPUs can actually deal with that many pixels. I’m guessing that right now, the answer will be barely, even with a 4090

This is my solution for the missions that I create, ie remove access to Fox 3 missiles, JDAMs, Aim9x etc. It’s not perfect, but I’m happy to live with it, as I’d rather have the time/effort required to be used in creating a completely new aircraft, than something that we can emulate to 90% accuracy with little effort

To clarify is that 1000 £, €, $, yen?

Being fair, you’re not wrong to question the sample sizes or group, however you have no evidence to say that it’s the player base isn’t nearly 70% in VR. I would happily state that it’s unlikely to be that high, but that’s most certainly NOT the same as can’t possibly be.

Was that bought fully built, or was some DIY required?

As DCS usually gets most of them wrong, I’d rather they don’t include auto-assign. Better still if we could have the option of disabling auto-assign.

Referencing general VR usage is IMO almost as suspect as extrapolating data from a small poll. The point being that DCS is a niche within the niche of flight sims. My “guess” (as I have no data to back this up) is that the average DCS pilot is likely to have more disposable income than your average gamer. As such, the financial “stretch” to add a VR headset is unlikely to be anything like the % spend on gaming related bits (the PC, console, monitor, accessories and software) for an average gamer. So I wouldn’t be surprised if the average for DCS users in VR is significantly higher. What is probably more relevant is a trend pattern for similar polls that have been run vaguely regularly.

I’ve been messing around over Normandy in the Mossie, P47 and Spit, which roughly fit. Reading a book about the Pathfinders gave me some ideas. For example, they were used in strikes against railways, Atlantic gun emplacements and similar in early 44’. Whilst we don’t have period 109s, being fair, apparently most had been pulled back to defend German airspace so the reality was that there was not going to be a huge level of CAP

OCUK have some zotac 4080S at £1000 and also just under

Fly what you enjoy, nothing wrong with that

It’s worth asking Andre and explaining to him the issue. I broke a pin on the power cable in mine and he talked me through a workaround which has worked perfectly since

On my monitor, DLSS seems to work really well (for me). In VR, I didn’t like DLSS at all. However, DLSS technology includes DLAA and to me that is a phenomenal solution and I much prefer it to MSAA and TAA.

+another 1

Have a hunt for a video by Greg on YouTube. He did an episode of what was the fastest warbird that saw combat. It’s long (like most of his vids) but very detailed.

Easiest way to interpret the statement is that it’ll be released when ready. Pointless even trying to guess. If you assume 2025, it’s unlikely that you’ll be disappointed

I couldn't even find that binding when I was out in the Mig19 this evening.

I wonder if ED might work the other way around, ie build the hi-fidelity Mig29a based on updated data, laser scans etc, then provide the visuals to the FC3 versions. That be would a really nice bonus.

As per the screenshot. The way that video flows is with the first 2/3rds being "this lot is on the overall plan, but with no dates", followed by the "coming in 2024" with the clips of Iraq and the Mig29a. That seems fairly explicit to me.

and interesting to note that they were the only modules that ED have committed to deliver in 2024, i.e. that the Corsairs, Intruder, Kiowa are not guaranteed for 2024.

Just wow.