Mr_sukebe

There was an issue that I believe was reported a few months ago, where attempting to sling load the L118 would result in it bouncing around, to the point that it would destroy your own helicopter. I've no idea whether that was resolved.

Fair comment on both. Sorry, it's been a long time since I've been in the A10C, and I'd completely forgotten about the HUD display only being digital.

I had reduced the % on the size of the mask, and with my Quest Pro, could see that it was doing something. Really confused me for a while, as I was wondering if there was a fault with Quad views. Disabled the mask and that solved the issue. I'm going to try it again with different %. Update: it was just me being rather overzealous with the mask. Re-enabled it, and am down to .35 with no visual issues.

Can I please put forward a new request to modify the current Resource Manager listing. e.g. for weapons with are given two columns in the list of available weapons for an airfield. The first column is the name of the weapon, stores or similar. The next is the % available, defaulting to 100%. I'd love to add an additional column added with the year first introduced into use. DCS clearly has this data as we can use a date to filter and prevent use of he newer items. My request is such that we can configure the mission resources available in a more granular manner. For example, for the F18c, if I deny availability of Aim9x, Amraams, targeting pods and most guided weapons, it ends up vaguely similar to an F18a (no, I know it's not the same, but it's the closest approximation available in DCS right now). Clearly, I can already restrict weapons. The "opportunity" that I have is simply not knowing when a lot of items were genuinely available. If we had the year introduced, at least we could be vaguely accurate, without having to apply a blanket restriction.

Can you please add binds for: - Analogue axis for the HUD brightness - On/off for Show Pilot Body

Have you read the opening post?

Normandy is a much better choice than the Channel now (imo). if you’re unsure about the flight model and difficulty, download DCS for free and try out the bundled PF51. No weapons, but otherwise flies the same as the normal P51, but without the weight of weapons. I use the PF51 as a recon aircraft.

I had reduced the % on the size of the mask, and with my Quest Pro, could see that it was doing something. Really confused me for a while, as I was wondering if there was a fault with Quad views. Disabled the mask and that solved the issue. I'm going to try it again with different %.

Please take a scan here:

Agreed that the issue exists. I did however get the impression that it was an issue with Windows, not just DCS. I've certainly included a comment to review that in my recommendation on VR performance:

I wonder if Dassault could buy the M2000 from Razbam. With the work done on the M2000 to improve its accuracy, my guess is that they already know each other. Either way, great news on Dassault joining as a dev.

I drew frontlines in using the inbuilt tool.

It might help to be a little more specific about your areas of concern.

When fully loaded, would I be correct in assuming that there needed to be a decent headwind, with the ship heading into the sea wind at say 20+ knots?

Ref extensions, I tried a 20cm Virpil, and preferred it without

If that's it, cool.

The Sept update has included a number of updates and I see that the manual has been spruced up, which is ace. At a high level, has this resulted in changes to procedures, and if so, which, eg: - cold start - take off - weapon usage - computer config - nav

Yes, there is

Thanks for the unexpected, but excellent update to the Viggen, my first hifidelity jet in DCS. Any news on the AI Draken? I was a little surprised that the A6 AI might arrive first.

The specs for the Dream Air look spot on. I’m still seeing far too many complaints about the Pimax solution to blow £1k on a maybe. I’m going to wait to see some balanced reviews before making a decision, ie not some sponsored video by an influencer

It was an interesting trade off, strike capability vs survivability. The fact that US carriers post the Essex class used armoured decks probably says it all.

Be aware that there's two versions of the DCS repair function, i.e. normal and slow. Sound like you might have used the normal. IMO, the best method to manage DCS is using the free Skazezilla app: Skatezilla's DCS Updater Utility GUI - Flight Sims - Mudspike Forums That allows you to easily manage multiple instances and easily enable the slow repair capability. It also allows simple choosing of whether to run in VR or on a monitor, something I find very beneficial.

To add, the ADI is still broken, which makes night flying … interesting.

Tell the local council, damn potholes

Recent earthquake?