Mr_sukebe

Absolutely, DLAA is just an alternative to MSAA, and deliberately avoids upscaling. Having said that, I found it preferable to MSAA visually.

Remove the targeting pods, R77, Aim120s and Aim9x and you should be good.

Please try DLAA

Have you tried DLAA? If not, give it a try in that Civ sim.

Monstertech have introduced a sliding rail solution that looks interesting. I’m guessing that there is a cheaper way to achieve that DIY

First words that came to mind "wow"! Awesome job.

Agreed with the above post. That issue sounds more like an issue with either tuning the use of the motherboard, or a compatibility issue between the RAM and motherboard.

I have a P38 in that Civ sim. It’s much better than most of the stock aircraft. Still not in the same league as say our Mosquito

I use DLAA in that other sim and think that it looks ace, ie better than MSAA. Give it a try

I do believe that pilot ear phones incorporate active noise reduction. I’ve no idea how effective it is, but “maybe” it’s correct. Best to ask that question of someone like Casmo

Does look awesome. Is that in a future patch?

I’m pretty sure that the there will be a downloadable miz containing an air race, there’s no need for ED to bother. A few years ago, my squadron used a miz built by someone else, was really fun. Included timing and captured if you’d missed a post or cut a corner. Sorry, don’t have the miz.

What timezone do you operate on?

Yep, same here

I think that I've knackered some of the USB ports on my motherboard by using them to power some of my gear, hence the move to powered USB hubs.

The USB hub is an Anker 10 port. Here's my links: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07K7DGKHN?psc=1&ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_product_details These are even more important than the USB power pack. I use three of the four supplied side to side. Made a huge difference to my comfort https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00VE4UJD4/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1 This is the Anker USB hub https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B07FMYV5H6/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1 And the USB cable that I use

I personally use of powered USB hub with an aftermarket USB cable. It still doesn’t maintain a full charge, but I’ve never had it run out as yet

I hope that you used the standard British way of cockpit ergonomics, i.e. put all the buttons, switches and dials in a box, throw in a hand grenade and see where they go.

Chaps, Apologies for sounding a bit thick. In the Config file for the quad foveated rendering are the following settings: [Oculus] peripheral_multiplier=0.4 focus_multiplier=1.1 horizontal_focus_section=0.5 vertical_focus_section=0.5 turbo_mode=1 How do those interact with the "rings" that are used by OpenXRToolkit to define the levels of dynamic foveated rendering? Do the horizontal and vertical refer to the use of a rectangle for DFR, that ignores the three rings of OpenXRToolkit? Does turbo_mode=1 mean that it's enabled and that I should change it to zero to turn it off? I don't have issues in game.

There are some settings that you might want to play with in mission editor, eg; - min engagement altitude, which I use for large WW2 AA - enemy engagement restrictions. These allow the option to disable engaging Air or Ground targets. Personally I’ve started disabling tanks and AFVs from engaging aircraft, unless they’re specific anti air units It’s not perfect, but IMO better reflects reality than having T55s sniping helicopters with their main gun

I’ve just received and fitted the TPR damper kit from Cubesim. Some photos: Whilst the damping is working, I have to provide other feedback for our fellow pilots; The initial price for these looks "not terrible". Hence me ordering them. Rather stupidly of me, I was on autopilot whilst going through the Paypal element, and simply said yes, before then realising that the postage was nearly 40% of the total cost of the item. Clearly my fault, but it could have been covered earlier in the ordering process Having realised that I'd just ballsed up, I emailed them straight after placing the order, to the email ID that they'd suggested. Followed that up with a polite reminder 3 days later. No response The assembly was fairly straightforward. They have a video on the website walking you through it. Fairly mug proof. HOWEVER, the bolts that are supplied to connect two of the printed plastic components are not quite long enough. My solution was to use a drill bit to deepen the whole just a little (having no appropriate bolts to hand). Sure, that's worked, but should I really need to be doing DIY? If you look at the first picture, the damper is not actually aligned perpendicular to the bolts. It's maybe 5 degrees off. Not enough to stop it doing it's job, but frankly, a bit pants. This is particularly so as the block that fixes onto the base of the TPRs is made of an upper and a lower printed plastic parts. If the holes in the lower plastic part were maybe 5-7mm further inboard, it would align perfectly. How was that (a) not noticed, or (b) ignored In short, yes, they seem to work fine, but the above list really niggles me, to the point that I struggle to recommend them to others.

Interesting idea. What it might then call for are maintenance benefits and times. Eg, let’s say that you’ve gone out on a mission, overused the engine a little and blown a tyre on landing. The tyre should be a fairly obvious repair item. For the engine, would you want for there to be a pop up maintenance window to give you the choice to repair? It would feed in nicely to the dynamic campaign idea as you might be able to restrict those maintenance windows if the airfield doesn’t have the appropriate supplies. Definitely worth interesting, though it could be seen as micro-management. I like the idea of it as an option, though it feels fairly low priority.

ok, you’ve made your point that you don’t think this adds value, we hear you. Can I please now ask that unless you’ve something new to add, that you allow others to have their say.

Tornado IDS, so I’m waiting patiently for it to arrive…sometime…

Your experiences appear to have been a common theme since Pimax made it to the market, and are the reason that I ended up with an alternative solution. Have to say that I’m still surprised that after a number of years that they’ve yet to really learn and implement genuine customer service