Nodak

Fire up Pimax Play, left side select 'Settings', than turn on the 'Public Test Channel', than hit the 'Check for updates' button top right. It works now and will offer you the option to update to 1.37.01.01

Same bug in a Pimax Light.

Not ever happening with that nose, it doesn't belong. Wish they'd made the radome's interchangeable like the helmet. Was in the force when the old aggressors were still around and the shark nose will never quite look right to me. Curiously the old AI model does it right.

ACMI range targeting pod that works and could give user feedback on any simulated selected weapon fired all avaliable on the stations panel in sim mode, maybe some day. You could drop all kinds of bombs all day long on a training range single sortie without actually carrying any and keep accurate score by a range officer on a range card. DCS ACMI Range module. Than afterward you could watch your range recorded fights and attack profiles, or watch an entire battle over the range. See it from any aircraft view that is equipped with a pod. Would need a Nellis range and map upgrade, the perfect spot for it. A dynamic campaign would already be half the work, you'd just need it to record and play out non-lethal, with simulated destroyed aircraft changing mode and exiting the range.

Stick and elevator positioning coordination isn't logical since most of the modern jets flight controls aren't even directly connected, the stick sends requests to the servo's which do the actual movement of the controls to the position the CADC tells them they're permitted to move, even in many a non fly by wire. Once power and pressure is off, the stick can still be moved, but it's not moving anything except itself. Era of direct connect bell cranks, cables, and pulleys to a flight control is pretty much long gone, they connect either electrically or mechanically to a servo controller, or a computer controlling a servo controller. Pretty sure that's already modeled with power and pressure on in game, as for matching the stick to an control may want to limit that to the WWII stuff where it applies. Even some of those aircraft came equipped with external crew placed control locks like the C-47's for both elevators and rudder for high wind conditions. MB-339 comes equipped with a stick forward lock, and is in the locked position on cold starts.

Their engineers worked diligently and quickly when I had issues with a new base, parts were immediately sent once the issue was known. They gave the option to return or do the swap out myself. Couldn't ask for more from my perspective, had great communications with engineering despite the language barrier and they didn't leave me in the lurch. Patients has always been required on ordering with Virpil, my original series one throttle from 2017 is still running strong as a T-34, feel absolutely no degradation or wear anywhere in it, couple thousand hours at least on it in the last eight years. Small company with top notch gear, you just have to wait a bit, it has gotten better, the rudders came really fast compared, in a mere two weeks.

Their website malfunctioning was enough to put me off. Lucky for me the control panel I wanted was available on Amazon where one gets the option to send it back.

And that's never going to happen because the CPU hardware is to wide and varied, it simply isn't fit for universal use. It's up to your own due diligence and research to see if your specific CPU and hardware combination will benefit. There are CPU's where using it will cause only harm like some of the AMD x3D series.

Pointless because the update requires a whole new install, it's not a simple applied over the top band aid patch, and it's not going to update automatically without asking first. They'd be class action sued for all the data loss. You'll be presented with a clean install option with the drive being swiped completely clean, or a newly installed upgraded op system while saving all your old programs and files stuff as back up, and you should know how that usually goes, not good. At a certain date they'll probably begin to hen peck you to death to do it, but doubt it will automatically install, we'd have already heard complaints and stories of it happening. Your panicking and reacting to a big nothing burger.

This is actually good news, the old template was no good for making a complex camouflage since it had mirrored textures shared on both sides. That's why good skins were rather limited along with volume.

When I make any adjustment in NVIDIA control panel the whole Play program locks up solid. Have a 20 speed USB 3 and its now giving problems in this version, the app says the C-lite isn't connected but the stars are on and it's fired up, nothing responds on the app, the whole desktop is dead. Going back to the previous version of P-play it now does the same thing where it was solid before. Only reinstalling the graphics driver to clean mode brings it back to life, right up until I attempt to set the power management to maximum. Never had any issues before, it ran solid, not this time.

I'll wait for next month Vietnam, the Western Central High Lands, DMZ sold separately.

You can always request some of the features you'll miss from the toolkit, because it's fading away fast, no one's touched it in two years. I kind of liked the saturation, exposure, and world scale slider, critical for IL-2 which has no other way to adjust these.

https://discord.gg/hjfNF2th

It's not just power lines, the remotest abandoned cabin should also be marked as a structure. These maps in my old MAC days were always under plexiglass on the flight planning table or on a rack at ops for use before you hit your route. Only the Navigator might actually pull one out during the flight, that is if a navigator was actually mission required and seated on board. More a route planning tool than anything, once your up you rely on the five sets Mk1 eyeballs, the map just gives you an advanced heads up before you ever lift wheels on what's out there to watch out for.

I've never experienced a wide FOV so guess I wouldn't miss that feature, coming off a G-2 it's an improvement with more corners available and superior vertical views. Apparently I won the lens lottery, they're so good I require glasses with this set. Had prescription lenses in the G-2 that made a difference but going without them the change wasn't as apparent as it is in the pimax, guess the larger sweet spot and clarity area makes it more noticeable. I'm putting in more hours siming with the lite than I have in with any of the other sets I've owned. Have some custom made experimental prescription lenses on the way for the win since glasses are not a long term comfortable option. I and my online flying pal both ordered within a day last May, we both think the C lite is a home run knocked out of the park as far as a worthy G-2 replacement. We've gone from only flying Friday nights occasionally to at least three times a week if not more since getting them in August. I understand there's problems and many people just won't fit certain VR products, it's VR and a highly personal and physical thing subjectively the eye's won't lie, but the way these guys come on here an try to make it right, you just don't see that happening much for any product. Not to mention the interest in our sport and collaborative efforts to integrate that which we require. So it's a job well done from my perspective team Pimax.

There's already a female crew member on one of the multi crewed AI heavies, closer to Roboblox characters in those birds. It'd be one thing if there was a universal pilot interchangeable and functional for each type, such as a single fighter pilot, a single trainer pilot, or a single Helo one, but there are literally a hundred plus different aircrew positions to do, basically its not going to be universally possible in my lifetime. But hey, we need a nail polish template and interchangeable hair styles.

Embarrassing ejection of another kind?

Thanks Calvin, survey filled out. Keep up the good work, it's getting there.

Don't worry too much, they're also busy releasing other products for other sims. Not like they are packing their bags and quitting the business. Go over to their discord, they're still very active. Even though I don't do those sims the stuff they just released is most impressive.

Was out snowmobiling a 100 mile loop trail south of Fargo and a ground blizzard developed on the far end, was a little disoriented on the flat valley almost featureless terrain. Fortunately I had a USAF tactical planning map stuck in the clear sleeve of the saddle bag over the fuel tank that showed the major power lines, because that was the only recognizable visible feature to navigate off. Between the map, the odometer, and the sun in the clear sky above eventually I orientated my way out of the ground blizzard.

Shiftall division was dumped by Panasonic a while back. https://www.roadtovr.com/panasonic-sells-shiftall-vr-startup/

Can't say HB, they released the Forrestal which is a pretty major asset, and for free.

If the view is so restricted to the front in real life under G loads, doesn't that make a direct contradiction to training doctrine as argued above? Why would you train with an opponent starting on your six since it would create an extremely dangerous situation. Maneuvering in the blind right in front of another craft, sorry but not buying the can't see argument, a SOF would go nuts and stuff would eventually collide doing that sort of uncontrolled training.

No kidding sherlock, but good BFM requires you not get in that situation in the first place, you already lost the game when they're already lodged on six. All the back viewing in the world won't fix that.