Jump to content

Don Rudi

Members
  • Posts

    372
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Don Rudi

  • Birthday October 19

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS, Raceroom, Assetto Corsa Competizione
  • Location
    Germany
  • Interests
    Simming, photography
  • Occupation
    Software developer

Recent Profile Visitors

5119 profile views
  1. Thanks I don't think you are doing anything wrong. There was a bug that the AI did not fire rockets, but when I wrote the missions they at least dropped their bombs. The bug was fixed meanwhile, but I fear that something else broke. I will check my end after my vacation.
  2. Before this change, the problem was that AI picked up cargo, dashed to the drop off point and only thereafter followed the flight plan.
  3. @BIGNEWY that sounds great, thank you! Can't wait to test it after my vacation in 3 weeks
  4. Honestly, this is another point keeping me away from MP - the arrogance of "seasoned" MPers. Of course I understand, why real military pilots want to stay among themselves. But I encountered this nose high attitude quite often in SIM groups on Facebook.
  5. I wouldn't sign that. I am 55 and used to play online a lot in the 90s and early 2000s. But those were mostly shooters, where one could dial in any time of day. I then moved to SIM racing and joined an awesome community. But that was far more complicated, as there were fixed times. The majority were British, so the times were naturally chosen to match their schedules. As I start work early, those times were simply too late for me. Same would apply for a DCS group. Added to that my initial statement, that I do not want waste my sparse free time, on bourse of cold starting my jet, because I was rammed while taxiing, shot down while taking off etc. Just not my definition of fun. And yes I admit, my old brain is too slow to fight teens and twens who do nothing else than flying all day long. Therefore I stuck to my SP, where I can fly whenever I want, whichever aircraft I want and any kind of mission I want.
  6. +1 The Zulu alert hangar is a must have imho.
  7. I can kind of confirm the bug. I just tested it in an empty mission with @Eisprinzessin's settings. However, I do believe it is not a MiG problem, but a scenery problem, as OP won the lottery and picked the one hangar that produces the error. I tested half a dozen shelters and all worked fine. His shelter 189: any other shelter: Position within the shelter does not appear to matter. I attached the track file of my test. @Raven (Elysian Angel) no, it is not my Interceptorado, though it looks similar. His shelter is in the north of the field, mine is in the south west and you'd be looking at a MiG-29, not a MiG-21 Bad visor.trk
  8. I had great fun testing the campaign, can highly recommend it
  9. Mission is updated to 1.0.4 Two more intercepts have been added: shadowing a NATO AWACS off the Danish coast - the RDAF F-16s might turn hot. the shephard. A Su-24 suffered an avionicsloss after a birdstrike. Guide it to a tanker using ADF and your radar.
  10. I will remove it
  11. Ahh, ok that's my debug message - in the beginning it says "bogey is F-15", "bogey is An-26" etc
  12. Hmm, I neither have surprise objects nor a voice over/on screen text "what is it" One of the randmoised intercepts features an F-15 though.
  13. I have to thank you, my friend. I guess you know that - when testing ones own missions, one simply doesn't see the most obvious of things. Like in my case the mismatching number or wrong heading - I was simply anticipating the correct ones
  14. Mission is updated to 1.0.2 Changes: changed tailnumber to match the voice overs GCI displays wrong heading - fixed added own parking stand and ATC channel to first kneeboard page added missing kill confirmation for the MiG-21s Thanks @YoYo for the sharp eye!
×
×
  • Create New...