Jump to content

MobiSev

Members
  • Posts

    609
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MobiSev

  1. go into BVR mode, make sure you give the SD-10 a little time to "warm up", change radar mode to tws, lock a target, fire
  2. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=256816 Already reported
  3. IDK if this is just me, but when i press the "Normal Zoom" view control, it resets a little too "zoomed out" Sorry, its a very small thing, I know
  4. prob one of the better release trailers i have ever seen
  5. how do you defeat it then other than just maneuvering?
  6. Yes, why are making this so complicated. It is very simple...ED has said that they are going to be fixing their missiles in the coming months. So, they have, by their own admission, modeled their missiles incorrectly. You should be raging in the correct forum, namely the "DCS World 2.5" section instead of asking Deka to nerf their missile
  7. ED did not give HB access to the missile guidance part of the code. As a result, the HB team had to base the 54 guidance on a 120 template.
  8. Wikipedia is a horrible source to use and is not reliable in the slightest. However, for the record, it says that the 120C-5 has a range of greater than 57nm, which can mean anything over 57 nm, not 57nm exactly.
  9. That's ED's problem, not Deka's. Deka did their job with the research evidently. They aren't going to throw their research out the window just to make the game "balanced"
  10. This is a combat flight simulator. You make weapons ranges based on research conducted, not other weapons in game.
  11. So, i guess you would use flares to defeat it?
  12. Shouldn’t it belike the Tunguska then? It seems REALLY accurate for only being guided by optics, although I might just not understand its guidance
  13. Oh I got it, but it was just an unnecessary jab
  14. Or I just wanted to know the price...don’t be like that
  15. are you supposed to get a lock or launch warning from the HQ-7 if it's just the launcher component with no search radar component? Because at the moment we get neither
  16. Since it is releasing on Dec. 4th, how much will the JF-17 cost?
  17. I’m expecting it to be $70-$80
  18. the Aim-9M, an earlier aim-9 version, or a later aim-9 version, like the X?
  19. This ^^^ I don't understand why they can't just disclose that...I mean they have already started working on it, and are evidently almost ready to post pictures, so it's not like they would change their minds about the theater.
  20. ugh...need updates! The hype is all too real
  21. I absolutely love that the damage is server side now, instead of client side. It makes for much more immersive multiplayer experience. However, we really need the ability to: 1. Repair damaged runways/taxiways AND/OR 2. Have a server option to make the runways/taxiways invulnerable to cratering When is this going to happen? To me at least, a semi-quick fix until the above options became available would be just to designate only the runway as client side damage only, with the rest of the map being server side damage.
  22. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4107290&postcount=8 If the beta patch schedule is followed, it should be tomorrow if everything goes according to plan
  23. Which should be tomorrow, if everything is still on track.
  24. evidently it will be auto enabled https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4063889&postcount=2
×
×
  • Create New...